Authorship Guidelines. All publications of the RESULTS must be compliant with the Authorship Guidelines of the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, as updated from time to time, accessible at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx.xx/en/dms/E/Publications/Guidelines-and-Recommen dations/integrity/Academies_Authorship.pdf.
Authorship Guidelines. If a student contributes to the conception and design of the study or the analysis and interpretation of data and the drafting of the article or critical revision for important intellectual content, then the student will be granted co-authorship on one or more publications reporting the results of the project. If a student fails to communicate about the publication for 1 year, the student forfeits any authorship. Please note that the sequence of authorship on the publication will be determined by the Fieldwork Faculty Advisor and the students’ contribution to the overall study.
Authorship Guidelines. Authorship on ADVANCE manuscripts is determined according to recommendations set forth by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The lead author is responsible for collaborating with their study team to identify and determine co-authors. If ADVANCE partners are contributing data or serving as scientific collaborators (i.e. co-investigator, site- PI) they should be invited to participate as authors on manuscripts using ADVANCE data. Invitations for authorship should be sent in the development, design, or analysis phase before interpretation occurs to allow potential co-authors to meet the necessary criteria. Partner investigators or collaborators may elect a representative (e.g., site analyst or project manager) join the manuscript team in their place. In addition to any specific journal requirements, authors on ADVANCE manuscripts need to meet four criteria:
Authorship Guidelines. All of the project’s key personnel as well as research assistants (i.e. the research team) have the opportunity to serve as authors of any and all reports/presentations based on the proposed project. Authorship is based on: (1) having made a significant and substantial contribution to the study on which the report/presentation is based, and/or to the content or writing of a specific report/presentation; and on (2) having read, approved, and taken written responsibility for the content of the final version of a specific report/presentation, e.g. the report sent to the publisher or abstract sent to a conference committee. First authorship is awarded to the member of the research team who has taken major responsibility for writing a report. Subsequent authorship is approved by the majority of the members of the research team. After the award is made and prior to the start of the project, key personnel will identify the report/presentation for which he/she will take major responsibility, the journal where the report will be submitted or meeting where a presentation will be made, and the timeline for the report submission and/or presentation. The principal investigator has first choice of paper(s) or presentation(s) and venues, but must share writing and presenting responsibilities so that each person on the team has an opportunity to be a first author of a report or presentation. If a person does not fulfill her/his writing/presenting responsibilities within one year of the date when the paper/presentation was to be completed, that paper or presentation may be taken over by another member of the team. HANDLING OF DISAGREEMENTS Promoting Breast Health Information in Chinese and Filipinos Page 2 of 5 Collaborative Agreement Guidelines To avoid conflict, the team has set-up procedures to promote a good working relationship such as the guidelines for authorship. However, differences of opinion are normal in the course of a collaborative arrangement. Disagreements concerning aspects of the project from the research purpose and aims to dissemination of data will be discussed by the team to promote an agreed upon course of action. If no agreement is reached after a reasonable period of time, then outside consultation will be sought and the expert in the aspect of the project under discussion will make the final decision. The research team agrees to abide by this decision. For example, a disagreement about data analysis may need to be settled by the project’s statisti...
