CDR Sample Clauses

CDR. The Contractor shall conduct a CDR at a mutually agreed time. The Contractor shall present data that [***]. The Contractor shall deliver a CDR data package two weeks prior to the meeting that includes all the draft, preliminary, and final documents listed in Figure 3-2 Contract Deliverable Schedule.

CDR. The Contractor shall conduct a CDR at a mutually agreed time. The Contractor shall present data that verifies the final design meets the S-BSS Performance Specification, including link budgets, the results of all remaining trade studies, the PDR risk mitigation results, the program master schedule, and the subsystem deployment plan including operational facility modifications and support. The Contractor shall deliver a CDR data package two weeks prior to the meeting that includes all the draft, preliminary, and final documents listed in Figure 3-2 Contract Deliverable Schedule.

CDR. Critical Design Reviews (CDR) assess design completion. A successful CDR demonstrates that the de- sign for any particular system or component is sufficiently mature for the Partner to proceed with series procurement, fabrication, assembly, integration, and verification for that particular system or component. The CDR should also review planning for verification. A successful CDR establishes a new baseline, described in [CMP] Chapter 5.1.5.3 as the ‘Design Baseline’ from which the Partner may proceed to Stage 2 Realisation and Verification. The Parties will plan and schedule sufficient number of CDRs to cover the design of each different system and component deliverable. See 4.1 including Table 1. For planning purposes CDRs can be expected to be conducted at the Partners premises. The duration for a CDR depends on the complexity of design and the number of different systems and components whose design is planned for review at a particular CDR. As early as possible before each CDR, ESS shall, in cooperation with the Partner develop a ‘charge’ con- firming deliverables to be reviewed i.e. the exact contents of the technical data package, nominating the review committee, proposing and agenda, listing participants and containing other coordinating infor- mation for the review. Note that the technical data package for each CDR should be delivered at least five (5) weeks prior to that CDR, or on a specific date agreed between the Parties for each CDR. The review meeting should include presentations by the Partner describing the design work undertaken, and explain each deliverable of the data package, and responding to questions raised by ESS in their pre- review of the technical data package deliverables. ESS shall deliver a verbal report at the conclusion of each CDR and written report as soon as possible after the completion of each CDR stating outcome, approval or otherwise, and any actions or recommen- dations.

CDR. Xxxxxxx deposed that until January 1, 1968 officers working exclusively as Sea Ca- det officers were so appointed by the Minister of National Defence. After January 1, 1968 they "be- came commissioned officers holding one reserved designation or another". They eventually "were designated as officers on the Cadet Instructor's List" (CIL-Sea Officers). These officers were subject to the same code of service discipline in the relevant National Defence Act and they were governed by other orders and regulations applying generally to Canadian Forces officers. 13 The CIL Officers worked exclusively in the Sea Cadet organization. Other regular military personnel could have some involvement with the RCSC program, although not typically in an ad- ministrative or supervisory role.

CDR. Xxxxx Gatduel Xxxxxxx 1. Xx. Xxxx el Mek Kur Vice Chairman of SPLM – United Minister of Animal Resources, Sudan Government.

CDR. Goods, works, non-consulting services, consulting services for the Project, and Operating Costs (other than Parts 1.2 and 2.1 of the Project) 102,000,000 100%