Common features for compatible criteria. As a result of ARU and stakeholder interviews, not many common criteria have been determined. Considering the interviews, four common criteria can be addressed. INCLUSION POLICIES: Inclusion policies should be developed by state and non-governmental organizations. Because forcibly displaced people are still regarded as guests in the host community. As long as this problem is ignored, no solution will be created. There is still a negative perception of forced displaced people in society. ADAPTATION ACTIVITIES: The number of adaptation activities should be increased. Economic assistance is available for forced displaced people, but activities to accommodate the host community are scarce. The negative perception to forcibly displaced people should be changed.
Common features for compatible criteria. As it can be summarised from above, any criteria should discuss: In order to generate minimum standards and agreements among the stakeholders, the Spanish ARU also worked on the following questions:
a) What should the social “context” be like in which a good practice or a successful inclusion strategy is developed? A social context that must and can be reviewed in order to work on diversity. Do we really accept diversity? Today's society teaches us to coexist, but not to live together. An ideal social context would be a host society that really welcomed migrants. A context that favours being part of a community in every way. The system rewards the similar ones and punishes the different. It would be interesting to take a political and activism point of view. To make people feel that things can be changed. Contexts that work on prejudices regarding migrants and delve into the causes of migration crises. Our lifestyle has consequences. A context that generates new narratives that can counteract hate speech. We have that responsibility. Reflect on the limits of action imposed by the financing. A context that can really coordinate, that works in a network. Promote spaces for organisation and exchange between different actors. It also has to do with the disposition of people. The importance of creating alliances. Participants in the focus group agree that the main factor is the legal context, since is there where the first situation of vulnerability occurs. The existing regulation is diffuse. There are legal limbos and precariousness, as, for example the expulsion order. There is precariousness because if the asylum seeker is denied asylum, he/she becomes an irregular immigrant, and this happens automatically if the administration does not meet the deadlines. In the asylum application there is a lack of information. There is also a lack of transparency on the part of the Administration, which is sometimes moved by political criteria. This occurs with especially vulnerable groups such as children or women in a situation of trafficking since a person may be an asylum seeker and a minor, or a victim of trafficking and asylum seeker, but the practice seems to be exclusive: if you are an unaccompanied minor, you are not an asylum seeker. Participants also agree that it is important to consider the legal context because it is easier and faster to change the legal context than the social context. On the other hand, if a person is not excluded by the legal system, it i...
Common features for compatible criteria. All refugees and migrants are entitled to protection with regard to their life, health, personal development, and human dignity. Good practices that aim to address the integration of VGs of FDPs should satisfy minimum quality standards and be implemented in the best way of responding to target groups' needs and covering a wide range of activities. Common features of minimum standards were identified above according to the following categories:
1. Catalogue of actor-oriented criteria to evaluate strategies and practices for the attention and inclusion of VGs of FDP
2. Preliminary study of approaches to integrate actor-oriented criteria in the evaluation of strategies and practices for the attention and inclusion of VGs of FDP - Technical feasibility - Efficacy and success - Respect of human rights and equity framework - Replicability and adaptability - Network coordination - Gender sensitiveness - Innovation - Awareness. 3 Identification of potential good practices
3.1. Characterisation of practices
