CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Sample Clauses

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS. A number of WTO members, including developing country members, share the concerns about the adequacy and the fair implementation of rules governing trade remedies such as AD measures. AD measures have been invoked with increased frequency and by an increasing number of measures. Easy access to and increased dependence on such trade remedies will nullify the benefits of tariff reductions. Developing countries, like Pakistan are worried not just about the frivolous complaints but also the repeated AD charges against the same products. It is noteworthy that new investigations are initiated against the same products almost immediately after the conclusion of an earlier investigation. Moreover, when it is proved that AD duties have been imposed without sufficient justification and evidence, the country which has acted unjustly to blunt competition is not penalised and made to reimburse the affected exporters the duties collected from the AD moves. The WTO is silent on the issue, though it needs to be addressed urgently. While an AD measure is one of legitimate trade remedies permitted under current WTO regimes, due attention should be paid to avoid its abuse for protectionist purposes. Serious problems exist even if final duties are not imposed, such as the AD investigations entail huge burdens on respondents, and that restrictive effects on the trade of the countries in question are significant. The reasons of the above mentioned problems are, inter alia; (i) lack of appropriate implementation of the AD Agreement due to its ambiguous provisions; and (ii) insufficient disciplines in the relevant provisions of the AD Agreement to avoid inappropriate AD measures. As a pre-requisite of appropriate implementation, it is essential to eliminate ambiguities in relevant Articles in the Agreement, thus clarifying standards for judgement entrusted to the investigating authorities. This can prevent arbitrary usage and has the advantage of facilitating implementation when measures are truly necessary. Clarification of procedures and standards can contribute to preventing unjustified petitions or investigations as well. Some specific recommendations for Pakistan are as follows: • There is an urgent need to have domestic AD legislation at the earliest. • The AD Agreement does not adequately address the potential for the abuse of AD proceedings to harass exporters. There is a need to eliminate ambiguities in the relevant articles of the AD Agreement. These issues should be ra...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS. 1. It is submitted that in order to disclose the concept of treaty it is possible to refer to the doctrine of international law, instruments of international law and national laws. There cannot be any inconsistencies between national laws and the instruments of international law with respect to the definition of the concept of treaty. Priority should be given to the concept of treaty provided in international instruments. Therefore on the basis of the theory of coordination between two legal systems a single concept of treaty should exist both in the law of treaties and national law.
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS. In this study no significant differences were found between the ECLIA and FIA methods. Both methods also show a very strong level of correlation and a good level of conformity. Suggestions for further research need larger samples.
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS. This chapter consist of two section. The first is conclusion which based on the research finding and discussions. The second section is suggestions which based on the conclusion purposed.
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 

Related to CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

  • Conclusions and Recommendations For the reasons stated herein, Merrimack Energy concludes that the shortlisting decisions by PG&E in the 2007 RPS RFO were reasonable and based on the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Solicitation Protocol. The selection of the shortlist was very inclusive and erred on the side of including more offers in what was a very ample shortlist relative to the procurement target. In the Shortlist Report, Merrimack Energy recommended a number of changes to the RPS procurement process, several of which were adopted by PG&E in the 2008 RPS RFO. Despite recommending certain changes, our assessment is that the PG&E evaluation methodology was appropriate and that it was administered fairly and reasonably. Consistent with suggestions we had made in and after the Shortlist Report, PG&E developed a negotiation prioritization strategy with shortlisted bidders that created an active group of negotiations based on price and viability factors. The Mojave Solar bid was consistently placed in the secondary group and although its proposal changed over time from the proposal initially shortlisted, it remained in the secondary group during the course of contract negotiations. While the project sponsor is a very viable and experienced developer of solar thermal projects and is capable of developing the project effectively, there are concerns associated with the timing of the project that adds risk to the ultimate success of the project. PG&E has done an effective job in managing these risks through contract provisions in both the original contract and the amended and restated agreement. The details of the PPA and the amended and restated agreement are addressed in the Confidential Appendix to this report. While the positive attributes of the project should be balanced against the negative attributes in assessing whether or not the amended and restated agreement should be approved, the IE has concerns about project value for the customers. In addition to the high project cost and low market value, the project contains a number of challenges to meet its proposed construction start date primarily associated with transmission interconnection and access. While PG&E has negotiated provisions in the Amended and Restated contract that generally protects the interests of consumers, should the firm interconnection be delayed longer than anticipated, PG&E customers may be exposed to higher RA costs to back-up the project should the cost of capacity in the market exceed the price caps established in the contract. In conclusion, the IE has reservations about the contract based on project value including the levelized net market value calculations relative to project benchmarks from other recent solicitations. PG&E Gas and Electric Advice Filing List General Order 96-B, Section IV AT&T Dept of General Services Northern California Power Association Xxxxxxxx & Xxxx LLP Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx & Brand OnGrid Solar Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxx Energy Praxair Arizona Public Service Company Economic Sciences Corporation X. X. Xxxx & Associates XXXX Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx LLP RCS, Inc. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, Inc. Xxxxxx Farms Recurrent Energy Xxxxxx Xxxxx Associates X. X. Xxxxxx & Assoc. SCD Energy Solutions Bloomberg GLJ Publications SCE Bloomberg New Energy Finance GenOn Energy, Inc. SMUD Boston Properties Goodin, MacBride, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx XXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx XxXxxxxxxx, P.C. Green Power Institute San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Brookfield Renewable Power Xxxxx & Xxxxxx Seattle City Light CA Bldg Industry Association Hitachi Sempra Utilities CLECA Law Office In House Energy Sierra Pacific Power Company CSC Energy Services International Power Technology Silicon Valley Power California Cotton Ginners & Growers Assn Intestate Gas Services, Inc. Silo Energy LLC California Energy Commission Xxxxxxxx Berkeley National Lab Southern California Edison Company California League of Food Processors Los Angeles Dept of Water & Power Spark Energy, L.P. California Public Utilities Commission Xxxx, Forward, Xxxxxxxx & Scripps LLP Sun Light & Power Calpine MAC Lighting Consulting Sunshine Design Cardinal Cogen MBMC, Inc. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx XXX & Associates Tabors Caramanis & Associates Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Tecogen, Inc. City of Palo Alto XxXxxxxx & Associates Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. City of Palo Alto Utilities Merced Irrigation District TransCanada City of San Xxxx Xxxxxxx Irrigation District Turlock Irrigation District Clean Energy Fuels Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx United Cogen Coast Economic Consulting Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx Utility Cost Management Commercial Energy NLine Energy, Inc. Utility Specialists Consumer Federation of California NRG West Verizon Crossborder Energy NaturEner Wellhead Electric Company Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP Navigant Consulting Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association (WMA) Day Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxx Associates eMeter Corporation Defense Energy Support Center North America Power Partners

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Conclusions 1. There is no basis for finding that the agreement discriminates against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.

  • Errors, Questions, and Complaints a. In case of errors or questions about your transactions, you should as soon as possible contact us as set forth in Section 6 of the General Terms above.

  • Findings 2. Based on the information known by or provided to the Department, the following findings are asserted for purposes of this Contract:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!