Contact and Selection of Stakeholders Sample Clauses

Contact and Selection of Stakeholders. From the conception of the IoT-A project, the partners took as a strategic decision not to include in the consortium any end-user organizations, since that would have steered the creative process towards a particular set of requirements, whereas the goal of IoT-A was to design a reference architectural model able to implement the Internet of Things in its entirety. In order to be able to collect requirements from a large number of different application fields, it was then decided to implement a “Stakeholders Group”, and to subsidize participation by reimbursing travel fees to meetings. Therefore, while not officially belonging to the project partners list, the Stakeholders are considered to be part of IoT-A's “extended family”. Based on other projects which have already used IoT technology, a number of application areas were then identified for stakeholder input for this project, namely: Logistics, Health Care, Technology Integrators, Retail, Automotive, Service Integrators and Telecom Operators. For each of these areas several companies and organizations were contacted; these organizations are well known in the IoT area, having spent a considerable amount of effort in designing IoT solutions for their challenges. Most of them replied positively to our requests, and we are happy to list them as belonging to the Stakeholders Group. The stakeholders are profiled as follows. Technology Integrators: Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx (Alcatel Lucent Services) is a member of the IPv6 Task Force France and sat on the board of the G6 for 6 years. He has a long IT background, starting at Schlumberger in 1984 for 3 years and then at Digital Equipment Laboratories for 5 years more. He joined ALCATEL in 1994 and now works for Alcatel-Lucent Services Group whose business is focused on strategic industries. Strategic industries cover everything that is not underlying to the telecommunication operators, such as Energy, Transportation or Public Safety. He is the director of a laboratory dedicated to provide innovative solutions, filling the gap between standard Alcatel-Lucent products and the specific needs of strategic industries. Xxxxxx Xxxx (Siemens) is Director for the department Mobile Business, Embedded and Distributed Systems and Intelligent Labels (RFID) and Senior Principal Consultant at Siemens IT Solutions and Services (Munich, Princeton and Seattle). Siemens IT Solutions, represented by Xxxxxx Xxxx presented the current situation and the major issues in the healthcare arena fr...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Contact and Selection of Stakeholders

  • Application and Selection (1) Application for professional development leave shall contain an appropriate outline of the project or work to be accomplished during the leave.

  • Selection of Representatives a) Each central party and the Crown shall select its own representatives to the Committee.

  • File Management and Record Retention relating to CRF Eligible Persons or Households Grantee must maintain a separate file for every applicant, Eligible Person, or Household, regardless of whether the request was approved or denied.

  • RECEIPT AND PUBLICATION OF NOTICES 11.1 Immediately after it receives a demand or notice from any Noteholder in accordance with the Conditions, the Agent shall forward a copy to the Issuer.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • NOTIFICATIONS AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS Unless otherwise stated in writing after the Effective Date, all notifications and reports required under this IA shall be submitted to the following entities: OIG: Administrative and Civil Remedies Branch Office of Counsel to the Inspector General Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Xxxxx Building, Room 5527 000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 LFAC: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, DPM 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xx. X-000 Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Email: xx.xxxxx@xxxxx.xxx Unless otherwise specified, all notifications and reports required by this IA may be made by electronic mail, overnight mail, hand delivery, or other means, provided that there is proof that such notification was received. Upon request by OIG, LFAC may be required to provide OIG with an additional copy of each notification or report required by this IA in OIG’s requested format (electronic or paper).

  • NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC EVENTS AND MEETINGS 2 A. CONTRACTOR shall notify ADMINISTRATOR of any public event or meeting funded in 3 whole or in part by the COUNTY, except for those events or meetings that are intended solely to serve 4 clients or occur in the normal course of business.

  • Summary of State Ethics Laws Pursuant to the requirements of section 1-101qq of the Connecticut General Statutes, the summary of State ethics laws developed by the State Ethics Commission pursuant to section 1-81b of the Connecticut General Statutes is incorporated by reference into and made a part of the Contract as if the summary had been fully set forth in the Contract.

  • SUBMISSION OF REPORTS All applicable study reports shall be submitted in preliminary form for approval by the State before a final report is issued. The State's comments on the Engineer's preliminary report must be addressed in the final report.

  • Audit Requirements for Recipients of State Financial Assistance For purposes of this paragraph, the word "Contractor" shall be deemed to mean "nonstate entity," as that term is defined in section 4-230 of the Connecticut General Statutes. The Contractor shall provide for an annual financial audit acceptable to the Client Agency for any expenditure of State awarded funds made by the Contractor. Such audit shall include management letters and audit recommendations. The State Auditors of Public Accounts shall have access to all records and accounts for the fiscal year(s) in which the award was made. The Contractor shall comply with federal and State single audit standards as applicable.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.