Disruptive Pupils Sample Clauses

Disruptive Pupils. Before a disturbed pupil (as determined by a psychologist or psychiatrist) or a pupil who exhibits special behavior problems which might impair instructional procedure or threaten the safety or welfare of the teacher or other pupils is assigned, the principal will discuss the case in a conference with the receiving teacher. Teachers encountering such pupils in their classes are encouraged to make the facts known to the principal at the earliest practical time so that proper referrals can be made for necessary psychological and/or social case work assistance, and such assistance shall be furnished as soon as practical. Teachers who refer a disruptive pupil shall receive, at the earliest practical time, follow-up information concerning the disruptive pupil. Classroom teachers will be informed of all student referrals.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Disruptive Pupils. In the event that the presence of any pupil or pupils becomes disruptive to the conduct of instruction or threatens the welfare and/or safety of the teacher and/or pupils, the teacher is hereby authorized to forthwith remove such pupil or pupils from the class and contact the principal or the assistant principal’s office as soon as possible, and such pupil shall not be returned to class by the principal until consultation with the teacher involved. In all cases, the removal of disruptive students shall conform to the procedures identified in the Arlington Central School District Code of Student Conduct.
Disruptive Pupils. Employees shall inform the administration of any situation, condition or occurrence, including the behavior of disruptive pupils, which may require administrative action.
Disruptive Pupils. Should any student become disruptive to the class or threaten the safety or welfare of the bargaining unit member or other students, the bargaining unit member has the privilege of temporarily removing the student from class into the care of the building administrator (or designee). The bargaining unit member shall, before the end of the school day, discuss the reasons for the removal with the building administrator. The building administrator shall advise the bargaining unit member of his/her action and recommendations.
Disruptive Pupils. In the event that the presence of any pupil or pupils become unduly disruptive to the conduct of instruction or threatens the welfare and/or safety of the teacher and/or pupils, the teacher is hereby authorized to remove forthwith such pupil or pupils from the class until such time as the objectionable behavior has been eliminated in a manner which, in the judgment of the teacher and principal directly involved, bests serves the interest of the Groton School System and the child.
Disruptive Pupils. Before a pupil who exhibits behavior problems, which might impair instructional procedures or threaten the safety or welfare of the teacher or other pupils is assigned, the principal will discuss the case in a conference with the receiving teacher. Teachers encountering such pupils in their classes are encouraged to make the facts known to the principal at the earliest practical time so that proper referrals can be made for necessary psychological and/or counseling assistance. Such assistance will be furnished as soon as practical.
Disruptive Pupils 
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Disruptive Pupils

  • Pupils The planned capacity of the Academy is 600 places in the age range 14 - 19, including a sixth form of 300 places. The Academy will be an all ability inclusive school whose requirements for:

  • Workload An employee who believes that her workload is unsafe or consistently excessive shall discuss the problem with her immediate supervisor. If the problem is not resolved in this discussion, the employee may seek a remedy by means of the grievance procedure. If the matter is not resolved in the grievance procedure, it may be referred to troubleshooter who shall: a) investigate the difference; b) define the issue in the difference; and c) make written recommendations to resolve the differences.

  • Workloads The parties agree to the following provisions relating to faculty members' workload. (a) The registration limits for all courses currently offered by the Employer in the academic, career and technology areas are 35 unless established by practice as lower, excepting multiple sections where the limit is the correct multiple of the number of sections involved. (b) The registration limits for English are as follows: (i) Writing and Composition Courses - 25 (ii) Writing Skills -17 (iii) Creative Writing - 22

  • Disruption 41.1 The Contractor shall take reasonable care to ensure that in the performance of its obligations under the Framework Agreement it does not disrupt the operations of the Authority, its employees or any other Contractor employed by the Authority. 41.2 The Contractor shall immediately inform the Authority of any actual or potential industrial action, whether such action be by their own employees or others, which affects or might affect its ability at any time to perform its obligations under the Framework Agreement. 41.3 In the event of industrial action by the Staff, the Contractor shall seek Approval to its proposals to continue to perform its obligations under the Framework Agreement. 41.4 If the Contractor’s proposals referred to in clause 41.3 are considered insufficient or unacceptable by the Authority acting reasonably, then the Authority may by notice terminate the Framework Agreement with immediate effect.

  • Workload Management 11.1 The parties to this Agreement acknowledge that employees and management have a responsibility to maintain a balanced workload and recognise the adverse affects that excessive workloads may have on employee/s and the quality of resident/client care. 11.2 To ensure that employee concerns involving excessive workloads are effectively dealt with by Management the following procedures should be applied: (a) Step 1: In the first instance, employee/s should discuss the issue with their immediate supervisor and, where appropriate, explore solutions. (b) Step 2: If a solution cannot be identified and implemented, the matter should be referred to an appropriate senior manager for further discussion. (c) Step 3: If a solution still cannot be identified and implemented, the matter should be referred to the Facility Manager for further discussion. (d) Step 4: The outcome of the discussions at each level and any proposed solutions should be recorded in writing and fed back to the effected employees. 11.3 Workload management must be an agenda item at staff meetings on at least a quarterly basis. Items in relation to workloads must be recorded in the minutes of the staff meeting, as well as actions to be taken to resolve the workloads issue/s. Resolution of workload issues should be based on the following criteria including but not limited to: (a) Clinical assessment of residents’ needs; (b) The demand of the environment such as facility layout; (c) Statutory obligation, (including, but not limited to, work health and safety legislation); (d) The requirements of nurse regulatory legislation; (e) Reasonable workloads (such as roster arrangements); (f) Accreditation standards; and (g) Budgetary considerations. 11.4 If the issue is still unresolved, the employee/s may advance the matter through Clause 9 Dispute Resolution Procedure. Arbitration of workload management issues may only occur by agreement of the employer and the employee representative, which may include the union/s.

  • Visibility 1. Unless the Council of Europe requests or agrees otherwise, the Grantee shall take all necessary measures to publicise the fact that the Action has been funded within the framework of a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe. Information given to the press and to the beneficiaries of the Action, all related publicity material, official notices, reports and publications, shall acknowledge that the Action was carried out with a grant from a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe and shall display in an appropriate way the Joint Projects’ visual identity (for instructions on use of the Joint Projects’ visual identity, see Appendix IV). 2. In cases where equipment or major items have been purchased using funds provided by the European Union or the Council of Europe, the Grantee shall indicate this clearly on that equipment and those major items (including display of the European Union and Council of Europe’s logos), provided that such actions do not jeopardise the safety and security of the Grantee’s staff. 3. The acknowledgement and Joint Projects’ visual identity shall be clearly visible in a manner that will not create any confusion regarding the identification of the Acton as a project of the Grantee and the ownership of the equipment and items by the Grantee. 4. All publications by the Grantee pertaining to the Action that have received funding from a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe, in whatever form and whatever medium, including the Internet, shall carry the following or a similar disclaimer: “This document has been produced using funds of a Joint Project between the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Council of Europe”. 5. If the equipment purchased with a grant from a Joint Project is not transferred to the local partners of the Grantee or to the final recipient of the Action at the end of the implementation period of this Agreement, the visibility requirements as regards this equipment shall continue to apply between the end of the implementation period of this Agreement and the end of the Joint Project, if the latter lasts longer. 6. All layouts of any communication items prepared by the Grantee are subject to approval with the Contact point within the Council of Europe. 7. The Grantee accepts that the European Union and the Council of Europe may publish in any form and medium, including on their websites, the name and address of the Grantee, the purpose and amount of the grant and, if relevant, the percentage of co-financing.

  • Constraints This agreement is expressly subject to the debt limitations of the Oregon Constitution set forth in Article XI, Section 10 and is contingent upon funds being available and appropriated therefore. Any provisions of this agreement which would conflict with law are deemed inoperative to that extent.

  • Traffic The provisions in this Section apply regardless how the ISP-bound traffic is determined.

  • Speed The relative importance we attach is “high”.

  • Downtime There may be downtime during the Migration. The duration of the downtime will depend on the amount of data that Agency is migrating. Axon will work with Agency to minimize any downtime. Any VIEVU mobile application will need to be disabled upon Migration.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!