Economic Impact Assessment Sample Clauses

Economic Impact Assessment. Examines how a proposed development might impact how people make a living, their material well-being and the economic structures of a society. This can include an examination of conflicts and transitions between non- market and market economic values and systems. The second level of EIA in the Mackenzie Valley: an in-depth examination of a proposed development by the Review Board. The process of systematically considering the potential impacts of a proposed development during decision- making. In the Mackenzie Valley, preliminary screening, EA and EIR are the three levels of EIA. The third and final level of EIA in the Mackenzie Valley: a comprehensive examination of a proposed development by a review panel. Benefits or costs that are not included in the market price of goods or services. Harvesting as defined in the MVRMA (Section 2), in addition to the gathering of berries, plants and other subsistence materials from the land. Archaeological or historic sites, burial sites, artifacts and other objects of historical, cultural or religious significance, and historical or cultural records. A principle that states adverse socio-economic impacts should not fall disproportionably on certain groups of the population, if they do not also have access to beneficial impacts from the development. IBAs are private contractual arrangements between a developer and a specific group of aboriginal people; intended as a means of providing benefits to communities in the course of development.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Economic Impact Assessment. CH2M shall incorporate the economic work that the Port and City have done to quantify cost of inaction using United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) economic standards as described below.
Sample 1
Economic Impact Assessment. Supporter shall work with Tough Mudder to share available information and data for Tough Mudder to develop an economic impact analysis of the Event. Tough Mudder shall work with Supporter to share available information and data for the same purposes.
Sample 1
Economic Impact Assessment. The larger rescue package containing more instruments can also only provide liquidity aid short term; it cannot solve the problems which caused the euro crisis. Any hopes that it might do so fail to recognize the fact that the real problem of the reeling euro states lies in the excessive, non-sustainably financed credit needs of not only the state but also the private sector, as has been proven by current account deficits and/or capital account surpluses of Southern European economies for years. While the rising prices of these credits indicate their weak sustainability and should therefore serve as a motivation to reduce credit needs, the EFSF focuses precisely on making such credits available at very cheap interest rates. EFSF aid is acceptable only if accompanied by a downsizing of the macro-economic current account deficits funded through foreign credits. Therefore, a restructuring of state budgets is necessary. Equally important, however, are real economy reforms, cuts in over-regulation, bureaucracy and too high unit labour costs and the promotion of innovation. Only such reforms can increase the competitiveness of the countries concerned and can help downsizing current account deficits. If EFSF aid does not provide for such fundamental reform requirements and if non-compliance with requirements is not sanctioned by the termination of further payments, then the EFSF will perpetuate the current crisis by further weakening the incentives to the affected Member States to carry out fiscal policy and real economy reforms. In fact, it is appropriate that the EFSF is subject to unanimous state decisions with regard to whether or not financial aid is granted. However, it is equally appropriate that those states which are beneficiaries must not participate in the first approval procedure regarding new financial assistance to other states. States receiving financial assistance should, unlike the provided provisions, not be entitled to participate in decisions regarding the payment of further aid tranches to those countries which received financial assistance prior to them. This increases the likelihood of the terms not being complied with. The EFSF can refinance its credit volume of 440 bn Euro only at best conditions (AAA) if Germany, Finland, France, Luxemburg, the Netherlands and Austria keep their AAA rating. Should, for instance, France lose its AAA-rating – and this is a very real possibility – then the EFSF’s capability to receive AAA-credits is reduced...
Sample 1
Economic Impact Assessment. The Economic Impact Assessment will be submitted to the City and the County within one month of receipt from the Games General Manager;
Sample 1

Related to Economic Impact Assessment

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment If, pursuant to Data Protection Law, Customer (or its Controllers) are required to perform a data protection impact assessment or prior consultation with a regulator, at Customer’s request, SAP will provide such documents as are generally available for the Cloud Service (for example, this DPA, the Agreement, audit reports or certifications). Any additional assistance shall be mutually agreed between the Parties.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.

  • Periodic Risk Assessment Provider further acknowledges and agrees to conduct periodic risk assessments and remediate any identified security and privacy vulnerabilities in a timely manner.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - DST shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats Schedule 10.2 p.2 occurring and the impact of those threats upon DST organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”). b. Risk Mitigation - DST shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Fund Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Fund Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of DST pursuant to the Agreement. c. Security Controls Testing - DST shall, on approximately an annual basis, engage an independent external party to conduct a review (including information security) of DST’s systems that are related to the provision of services. DST shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!