Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A) A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement.
B) The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator.
C) The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later than May 15th.
D) For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
E) For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A) A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement.
B) The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator.
C) The Directed Growth Plan process shall include:
i) Within ten school days of notification to the Educator that the Educator is being placed on a Directed Growth Plan, the Primary Evaluator and Building Principal shall schedule a meeting with the Educator to discuss the Directed Growth Plan. The Evaluator(s) and Educator will mutually develop a specific plan of assistance to address the areas of need specified in writing by the Evaluator(s).
ii) The Educator may request that a representative of the Employee Organization/Association attend the meeting(s).
iii) The Association will be informed that an Educator has been placed on a Directed Growth Plan, but no further details will be provided without the consent of the Educator.
D) The Directed Growth Plan shall:
i) Define the improvement goals directly related to the performance standard(s) and/or student learning outcomes that must be improved;
ii) Describe the activities and work products the Educator must complete as a means of improving performance;
iii) Describe the assistance that the district will make available to the Educator;
iv) Articulate the measurable outcomes that will be accepted as evidence of improvement;
v) Detail the timeline for completion of each component of the Plan, including at a minimum a mid-cycle formative assessment report of the relevant standard(s) and indicator(s);
vi) Identify the individuals assigned to assist the Educator which must include minimally the Supervising Evaluator; and,
vii) Include the signatures of the Educator and Supervising Evaluator. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the Improvement Plan. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents.
viii) A paper copy of the plan shall be placed in the Educator’s personnel file.
E) The Evaluator shall complete a Summative Evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later than two school days before the summative evaluation meeting.
F) For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
G) For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose over...
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A) A Directed Growth Plan is for those Experienced Administrators whose overall rating is needs improvement.
B) The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator.
C) The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Administrator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later than June 1st.
D) For an Administrator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Administrator on a Self- Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
E) For an Administrator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Administrator as unsatisfactory and will place the Administrator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A. A Directed Growth Plan is for an Educator with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement.
B. The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as stated in the previous Summative Evaluation.
C. The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator by May 31st.
D. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Two Year Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle. E For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A. A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement.
B. The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator.
C. The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later June 5th.
D. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a one year Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle. Should the educator receive a Needs Improvement on their formative or summative evaluation in the following year, while on the SDGP, the educator will be moved to a Directed Growth Plan immediately.
E. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A) A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement.
B) The length of the Plan shall be one full school year cycle.
C) The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator.
D) The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan but at least annually, and in no case later than May 15th. A decision on the Educator’s status must be made no later than June 1st of the year in which the Educator is on the Directed Growth Plan.
E) For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, he/she shall be placed on a Self-Directed Growth plan for the next evaluation cycle.
F) For an Educator whose overall performance is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next evaluation cycle.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A) A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement.
B) The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator.
C) The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later than June 1st.
D) For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
E) For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
F) A Directed Growth plan shall be for one school year or less, but not less than sixty (60) school days.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement. The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator. The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later four weeks after the Tuesday after April vacation. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall performance rating is not at least proficient, the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
Educator Plans: Directed Growth Plan. A Directed Growth Plan is for those Educators with PTS whose overall rating is needs improvement. Upon the written consent of the Educator, The Association President will be informed that an Educator has been placed on a Directed growth Plan and will be provided with the name of the Educator and the time of all meetings. The goals in the Plan must address areas identified as needing improvement as determined by the Evaluator. The Evaluator shall complete a summative evaluation for the Educator at the end of the period determined by the Plan, but at least annually, and in no case later than May 15th . For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall summative performance rating is at least proficient, the Evaluator will place the Educator on a Self-Directed Growth Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle. For an Educator on a Directed Growth Plan whose overall summative performance rating is not at least proficient, the Educator may continue on a Directed Growth Plan at the discretion of the Evaluator or the Evaluator will rate the Educator as unsatisfactory and will place the Educator on an Improvement Plan for the next Evaluation Cycle.
