End-to-End Encryption Sample Clauses

End-to-End Encryption. If available, Merchant may utilize end-to-end encryption products and services as provided wholly or partially by a third party with the support of Processor (“E2EE Service”). The E2EE Service is designed to: (i) encrypt (make unreadable) card data information at the origin of the payment transaction, which is a point-of-sale (POS) terminal that has licensed application software which supports the E2EE Service; and, (ii) decrypt card data information at the destination of the transaction, which are the Processor’s processing systems. Card data information protected by the E2EE Service may include Track 1 or Track 2 data (Magnetic Stripe Data obtained through a magnetic card swipe read) or PAN Data (Manually Entered Personal Account Number (card data) as appropriate to the type of transaction processed on the terminal. The terminal application software supporting the E2EE Service is designed to generate encryption keys which are used in conjunction with the terminal application to encrypt card data during transmission of the transaction authorization request from the point of sale terminal. The E2EE Service applies only to transactions sent from the terminal to Processor’s authorization and settlement systems pursuant to this Agreement. The service supports transactions associated with credit (signature), debit (signature), debit (PIN), and specifically excludes Visa POS Check transactions, gift card transactions, and transactions originated from terminal application software installed in the terminal that is provided by a third party. Merchant bears all risk and responsibility for conducting Merchant’s own due diligence regarding the fitness of E2EE Service for a particular purpose and for determining compliance with the Bank Rules, the Operating Regulations, and the Laws. Accordingly, Merchant’s use of E2EE Service is at Merchant’s own risk. Processor's sole responsibility to Merchant in connection with E2EE Service will be to communicate service or other issues to the applicable licensed encryption software provider as documented by Merchant in writing to Processor. Processor’s decision to offer E2EE Service shall not limit Merchant’s duties and obligations contained in this provision or the Agreement. Merchant acknowledges that provision of E2EE Service to Merchant is subject to several factors, including, without limitation, the availability of the licensed encryption software from the applicable third party provider and Merchant’s compliance with the ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
End-to-End Encryption. All PSAPs shall support encryption of traffic from and towards the ESInet as defined in the Bell NG9-1-1 UNI technical specification;
Sample 1Sample 2
End-to-End Encryption. Given that a sizable minority of the sample use end-to-end encryption, it is worthwhile to explore whether this has increased over time. Previous research has posited a “displacement effect” from mainstream platforms to encrypted ones, particularly after mainstream social media platforms took a tougher and more proactive approach towards content moderation (Xxxxxx 2016b; Xxxx and Xxxxxx 2019; Xxxxx et al. 2017). This view has also been reflected by policymakers and law enforcement practitioners, for example former UK Home Secretary Xxxxx Xxxx (Xxx 2017) and former FBI Director Xxxxx Xxxxx (XxXxxxxx 2015). However, the descriptive statistics discussed above are not sensitive to the date of the actor’s event – i.e. the day of their planned attack, travel, or arrest. It is possible that, as the “displacement theory” suggests, actors mostly used mainstream platforms until around the end of 2015, at which point suspensions drove them away (Xxxxxx and Xxxxx 2016; Xxxxxx 2016b). To compare the event dates of the individuals that used end-to-end encryption against those that did not, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests was performed. The results indicate that there are no significant differences between the two groups.36 The distribution can be seen in the bar chart below (Figure 13) and the breakdown of actual and expected figures can be seen in Table 3. Figure 13 - Year of Terrorist Event by use of End-to-end Encryption There is no statistically significant increase of end-to-end encryption over time, especially since the end of 2015. Running each individual year as a chi-square analysis shows that the years 2015, 2016, and 201737 are all within one integer of their expected count. This suggests that, for this sample at least, the notion of widespread migration away from mainstream platforms may not hold. However, it appears clear from recent research that end-to-end encrypted platforms, particularly Telegram, are central to the jihadist online 36 F(1,199) = .741, p = .390. 37 There were only six new cases in 2018, although end-to-end encryption was used in three of those cases, which is double the expected count. ecosystem (Xxxxx et al. 2017; Xxxxxx 2016; Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx 2017; Europol 2017; Europol 2018). Recent research has suggested that there are over 600 pro-IS telegram channels that have English-language content (Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx 2019). The best way to parse this is to take insight from Xxxx and Corner (2013) and not to conceptualise all te...
Sample 1

Related to End-to-End Encryption

  • Workstation/Laptop encryption All workstations and laptops that process and/or store DHCS PHI or PI must be encrypted using a FIPS 140-2 certified algorithm which is 128bit or higher, such as Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). The encryption solution must be full disk unless approved by the DHCS Information Security Office.

  • Data Encryption Contractor must encrypt all State data at rest and in transit, in compliance with FIPS Publication 140-2 or applicable law, regulation or rule, whichever is a higher standard. All encryption keys must be unique to State data. Contractor will secure and protect all encryption keys to State data. Encryption keys to State data will only be accessed by Contractor as necessary for performance of this Contract.

  • Workstation Encryption Supplier will require hard disk encryption of at least 256-bit Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) on all workstations and/or laptops used by Personnel where such Personnel are accessing or processing Accenture Data.

  • Encryption The Fund acknowledges and agrees that encryption may not be available for every communication through the System, or for all data. The Fund agrees that Custodian may deactivate any encryption features at any time, without notice or liability to the Fund, for the purpose of maintaining, repairing or troubleshooting the System or the Software.

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Compatibility 1. Any unresolved issue arising from a mutual agreement procedure case otherwise within the scope of the arbitration process provided for in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall not be submitted to arbitration if the issue falls within the scope of a case with respect to which an arbitration panel or similar body has previously been set up in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral convention that provides for mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved issues arising from a mutual agreement procedure case. 2. Nothing in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall affect the fulfilment of wider obligations with respect to the arbitration of unresolved issues arising in the context of a mutual agreement procedure resulting from other conventions to which the Contracting States are or will become parties.”.

  • Encrypt or Encryption As defined in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Security Rule at 45 CFR 164.304, means the use of an algorithmic process to transform Personally Identifiable Information into an unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable form in which there is a low probability of assigning meaning without use of a confidential process or key.

  • Connectivity User is solely responsible for providing and maintaining all necessary electronic communications with Exchange, including, wiring, computer hardware, software, communication line access, and networking devices.

  • Procedures for Providing NP Through Full NXX Code Migration Where a Party has activated an entire NXX for a single Customer, or activated at least eighty percent (80%) of an NXX for a single Customer, with the remaining numbers in that NXX either reserved for future use by that Customer or otherwise unused, if such Customer chooses to receive Telephone Exchange Service from the other Party, the first Party shall cooperate with the second Party to have the entire NXX reassigned in the LERG (and associated industry databases, routing tables, etc.) to an End Office operated by the second Party. Such transfer will be accomplished with appropriate coordination between the Parties and subject to appropriate industry lead times for movements of NXXs from one switch to another. Neither Party shall charge the other in connection with this coordinated transfer.

  • Interfaces GTE provides the CLECs with choices for access to OSS pre-ordering, ordering, maintenance and repair systems. Availability of the interfaces is fundamental to the CLEC being able to effectively do business with GTE. Additionally, in many instances, CLEC personnel must work with the service personnel of GTE. Measurements in this category assess the availability to the CLECs of systems and personnel at GTE work centers.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!