Evaluating Jobs Sample Clauses

Evaluating Jobs. 7.1 Consistency and objectivity are essential attributes in evaluation. The following list represents the most common do’s and don’ts for evaluators. They should: • not make assumptions about the nature or scope of others’ jobs. This can lead to underestimation or overestimation of the value of different jobs. • ensure that any important job demands are not omitted. • ensure that there is no double counting of job demands. • be wary of the “halo effect”, that is an unconscious assumption that a job holder should score highly on all factors, because the job holder has scored well on the first factor(s). • be wary of the “reverse halo effect”, that is an unconscious assumption that a job holder should not score well on all factors, because the job holder has not scored well on the first factor(s). • be aware that jobs that are known to have high status will not necessarily score highly on all factors. Similarly jobs which have low status will not necessarily score poorly on all factors. • not allow prior knowledge about present pay or the status of job holders to influence rating decisions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluating Jobs

  • Experience A minimum of 1 year of IT work experience in computer systems or support with demonstrated working knowledge of basic hardware and software products and problem solving/troubleshooting skills.

  • Evaluator Any person designated by a superintendent who has primary or supervisory responsibility for observation and evaluation. The superintendent is responsible for ensuring that all Evaluators have training in the principles of supervision and evaluation. Each Educator will have one primary Evaluator at any one time responsible for determining performance ratings.

  • Expertise Such Member alone, or together with its representatives, possesses such expertise, knowledge and sophistication in financial and business matters generally, and in the type of transactions in which the Company proposes to engage in particular, that such Member is capable of evaluating the merits and economic risks of acquiring and holding the Units, and that such Member is able to bear all such economic risks now and in the future;

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.