EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE Sample Clauses

EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE. I. A Review Committee will be established to review problems arising as a result of the program for staff development and evaluation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Evaluation Review Committee (ERC) will provide additional stakeholder input and facilitate the statutorily required consultation with teachers relative to the development and subsequent revision of the Board's standards-based evaluation system, in addition appointed by the Association President and three (3) administrators appointed by the Superintendent. If possible, selections should be made to include representatives from the elementary, middle and high school as well as special education and the arts.
EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE. In case an applicant considers that the evaluation of his/her proposal was not carried out in accordance with the procedural rules, he/she may file a complaint requesting an evaluation review. In this case the Evaluation Review Committee is set up and convened in line with the Horizon 2020 Vademecum. The nomination of members from the 17 Horizon 2020 Vademecum, Section 4, Grant Proposals 18 Horizon 2020 Vademecum, Section 4, Grant Proposals 19 Horizon 2020 Vademecum, Section 4, Grant Proposals 20 Horizon 2020 Vademecum, Section 4, Grant Proposals relevant Research and Innovation parent DGs is recommended. The appointment of the members of the committee is done by the Director of the Agency. Where more than one relevant research and innovation parent DGs are involved, the formal appointment is preceded by an agreement at working level. The Evaluation Review Committee may request the advice of the Redress Office and the legal support of the CLSS, through the central legal team of the REA, regarding the issues related to its work, according to the Horizon 2020 Vademecum. Further detailed procedures for the work of the Evaluation Review Committee, including cases of disagreement between the Committee and the XXX are defined in the Horizon 2020 Vademecum21.‌
EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The parties agree to establish a joint labor-management Evaluation Review Committee which is comprised of both FPS and FEA personnel. The Evaluation Review Committee shall meet and engage in discussion when an item on an evaluation form or the evaluation tool seems problematic. The Evaluation Review Committee will also consider any issues raised relative to Teach Point. Recommendations from the Evaluation Review Committee shall be brought to the next Evaluation negotiations.
EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE. A. No member of the instructional staff shall serve on more than one evaluation review committee during any academic year. The evaluation review committee shall consist of the following four members:
EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE. The Secretary General shall establish an Evaluation Review Committee to examine all facts and explanations submitted by the staff member. The Evaluation Review Committee shall comprise one (1) Director who is not in his/her area, the Human Resource Manager, the Legal Advisor and a representative of the staff member appointed directly by the Secretary General.

Related to EVALUATION REVIEW COMMITTEE

  • Review Committee A Student may ask that the decision of the Housing Director or designee to deny the cancellation be reviewed. The review will be conducted by a committee consisting of University officials.

  • Evaluation Committee A The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Development Committee for the purpose of establishing the procedure and process, including the evaluation instrument, for the evaluation of teachers in the District and to regularly review the effectiveness of the procedure and process, including the evaluation instrument, for the evaluation of teachers in the District.

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Advisory Committee The Settling State shall designate an Opioid Settlement Remediation Advisory Committee (the “Advisory Committee”) to provide input and recommendations regarding remediation spending from that Settling State’s Abatement Accounts Fund. A Settling State may elect to use an existing advisory committee or similar entity (created outside of a State-Subdivision Agreement or Allocation Statute); provided, however, the Advisory Committee or similar entity shall meet the following requirements:

  • Monitoring Committee The Monitoring Committee shall be established within six months of the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding. Its role is stipulated in the Regulation, in particular Article 4.4 thereof.

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. The Recipient shall: • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. Products: • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Study Committee The parties shall utilize the Benefits Advisory Committee, with equal membership by the State and the VSEA, for the purpose of reviewing all issues related to health care and prescription drugs, and recommending changes to the bargaining committees. The parties shall also establish a special study committee to evaluate the current health plans, and make recommendations to the bargaining committees of the State and employees for sustainable savings in the health care plans.

  • Steering Committee The Project Manager shall set up a Steering Committee for the Project, consisting of representatives from the Department, the Contractor, and any other key organisations whom the project will impact on, to be agreed between the parties. The function of the Steering Committee shall be to review the scope and direction of the Project against its aims and objectives, monitor progress and efficiency, and assess, manage and review expected impact and use of the findings from the Project. The Committee shall meet at times and dates agreed by the parties, or in the absence of agreement, specified by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall report their views on the progress of the Project to the Steering Committee in writing if requested by the Department. The Contractor’s representatives on the Steering Committee shall attend all meetings of the Steering Committee unless otherwise agreed by the Department.

  • Staffing Committee A. Responsibilities. The Nurse Staffing Committee (“NSC”) shall be responsible for determining the Institute’s staffing plan and resolving complaints raised by nurses regarding the implementation of the plan as well as those activities required of it under RCW 70.41, et seq and its successors.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.