Examination Procedure. Any employee has the right to examine the results of his or her own examination. The documents are confidential and they cannot be removed from the files. However, the contents of promotional documents will be made known only to the Sheriff and his or her designated representatives, and the employee and his or her designated representative.
Examination Procedure. Any employee has the right to examine the results of his/her own examination. These documents are confidential and they cannot be removed from the files, except as set forth in the following paragraph. The contents of promotional documents will be made known only to the Sheriff and his/her designated representatives, and the employee and his/her designated representatives. Commencing the first full pay period following promotion, the promoted employee shall receive the rate of the new classification at the same step paid the employee prior to the promotion. All promoted employees shall be on job probation for a period of six (6) months immediately following the promotion. During such probationary period, the Sheriff may demote the employee to his/her former classification or the employee may, on his own volition and in writing, request to be relieved of his/her new position and be returned to his/her former classification.
Examination Procedure. (a) All qualified applicants will be given a study package identified by the Fire Chief. The applicants will have 60 days in which to prepare for the evaluations.
(b) The written exam will consist of a multiple-choice test.
(c) The practical exam will consist of oral questions stemming from the Operational Guidelines, Fire Department apparatus and equipment, area knowledge and fire bylaws.
(d) Firefighters will be eligible to write their exams and complete their practical evaluations six weeks prior to the date of their eligibility for promotion. Failure of either the written or practical exam will result in no promotion; however the exam(s) may be retaken three weeks after the date of the failed exam. Upon successful completion of the exam process and time in rank, firefighter will be promoted to the rank being sought.
Examination Procedure. Any Sergeant has the right to examine the results of his own examination. The documents are confidential, and they cannot be removed from the files. However, the contents of promotional documents will be made known only to the Sheriff and his designated representatives, and the Sergeant himself and his designated representative.
Examination Procedure. 1. Any deputy has the right to examine the results of his own examination.
2. These documents are confidential, and they cannot be removed from the files, except as set forth in the following paragraph.
3. The contents of promotional documents will be made known only to the Sheriff and his designated representatives and the deputy himself and his designated representatives.
Examination Procedure. By submitting the application to sit for the IAPD Fellowship examination, candidates agree to give online access to their computer or laptop, including its microphone and camera to an online invigilator (xxxxxxx). Prior to the exam candidates will be required to book an exam time slot and to test their equipment with the Xxxxxxx, in order to ensure that no technical problems occur on the day of the exam. Failure to book a time slot and test your equipment will mean that the candidate will not be authorized to take the exam. Exam Proctoring (the online invigilator) - ProctorU, a company that specialises in invigilating exams remotely will be directly monitoring the examinee throughout the exam. The invigilator is there to monitor the candidate throughout the exam and assist with any technical problems.
Examination Procedure a. Each unit of can samples should be inspected and classified for the visual defects which are listed and defined below. Record results of each sample inspection on the work form attached. (Visual Inspection Self-Manufactured Cans for two-piece or three-piece cans). Any defects not listed may require review with the can plant or container supplier and quality assurance before being included in the evaluation of lot or lots. All defective critical and major cans will be marked with date, time, lot number, tag number and defect circled and cans saved for review in the event the quality of a lot is questioned.
b. If a can has more than one defect it will be counted only as one defective can in the classification of the most critical defect.
c. When all sample cans have been inspected and the defectives classified and recorded, the total number of defective cans will be compared with the acceptance and / or rejection numbers of the sampling plan.
Examination Procedure. A. Each unit of the end samples should be inspected and classified for the visual defects which are listed and defined below. Record results of each sample inspection on the attached work form for visual inspection for ends. Any defects not listed may require review with the can plant or container supplier and quality assurance before being included in the evaluation of lot or lots. All defective critical and major ends will be marked with date and time and defect circled and the ends saved for review in the event the quality of a lot is questioned.
B. If an end has more than one defect it will be counted only as one defective end in the classification of the most critical defect.
C. When all sample ends have been inspected and defectives classified and recorded, the total number of defective ends will be compared with the acceptance and/or rejection numbers of the sampling plan.
D. Immediately notify can plant supervision upon discovery of a critical or major defect for corrective action.
Examination Procedure. Members of the examination committee appointed to conduct the examinations mentioned in § 6 it. 2 of the present Agreement are appointed in accordance with the regulations in force at the University of Warsaw, as it is an activity required by the UW. Members of the doctoral committee, appointed to propose candidates for reviewers, to permit the defence of the Ph.D. student and to carry out the defence of the thesis, shall be chosen in accordance with the rules applicable in both institutions. The doctoral committee consists of representatives of both institutions, entitled to perform this function, and has at least ………. members. Three reviewers and …… supervisors appointed by the Polish and ……….. side are also the members of the doctoral committee, unless it is contrary to the provisions of any of the Parties to the Agreement. It is also possible to appoint members of the doctoral committee from outside both institutions. The supervisors’ renumeration will be paid by ………..(to be agreed) The renumeration of the reviewers will be paid by ………..(to be agreed) The costs related to the travel and stay of the members of the doctoral committee from …………., shall be divided equally between the Parties to the Agreement. (to be agreed)
Examination Procedure. 22.01 1. Candidate shall be permitted to review the exam with the Examiner.
