General Design and Study Schema Sample Clauses

General Design and Study Schema. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 200-mcg dose of IPP-201101 plus SOC compared with placebo plus SOC in patients with active SLE. The study consists of a 2-week screening period (visit 1), a 48 week treatment period beginning with a baseline visit in which randomization will be completed and study drug treatment will start (visit 2 and visits 4 through 14), and a final assessment 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (visit 16 [week 52]). NOTE: If needed during the screening period, up to 14 additional days are permitted to confirm eligibility (eg, BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K, and PhGA central system assessments, laboratory results ….). In addition to the typical assessments obtained at the screening visit, such as obtaining medical, psychiatric, and medication history (medication history to be obtained from start of screening) and performing a physical examination and tests to determine the patients’ health status and eligibility for participation in the study, procedures will include assessment of disease activity using the SLEDAI-2K and BILAG-2004 disease activity indices and the SFI, and disease marker testing (ie, at screening, anti-dsDNA Ab, C3, C4, and XXX only]). Eligibility will be confirmed by using a central system to validate the BILAG-2004, SLEDAI-2K, and PhGA assessments . Eligible patients will return to the study center at baseline and will be randomly assigned (stratified by region, SLEDAI-2K screening total score [6 to 9 or ≥10], and racial-ethnic group classification [black/Hispanic or others]) at baseline with an equal probability and in a blinded fashion to receive either IPP-201101 or placebo sc every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. Pretreatment assessments will be performed and the 1st dose of 200 mcg sc of IPP-201101 or placebo (sc) will be administered after all assessments have been completed. Patients will be monitored for systemic symptoms for at least 1 hour after the first 2 doses of study drug have been administered. For subsequent doses, patients will be monitored, at the discretion of the investigator, in the study center after study drug treatment. Patients will return to the study center 2 weeks after administration of the 1st dose of study drug for immunogenicity testing, and every 4 weeks for 48 weeks (weeks 4, 8, 12,16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48) to receive study drug. Patients may continue on their usual treatment for SLE (ie, SOC) as long as the inclusi...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
General Design and Study Schema. This is a phase III, multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of two doses of Dysport® (600 U and 800 U) in adult subjects with SCI or MS with UI due to NDO, who have not been adequately managed with oral medication and who routinely require CIC to manage their bladder function. The study will be conducted at approximately 90 study sites and 330 subjects are planned. This study has two treatment periods: • A double blind placebo controlled period, where subjects receive a single IMP treatment administration of either 600 U or 800 U Dysport® or placebo • A subsequent double blind active treatment period, where subjects can receive multiple active IMP retreatment administrations of either 600 U or 800 U Dysport®. This second period commences when subjects receive their first study retreatment. There is significant variability of local clinical practice in conducting urodynamic (filling cystometry) assessments. Due to the difficulties in standardising and performing study specific urodynamics in a global program, this study will include sites that are unable to alter their local site practice sufficiently to perform standardised urodynamics. The study therefore has two subsets: • Urodynamic subset (planned ≥200 subjects) o All subjects in this subset must have standardised urodynamics (as described in the Study Specific Urodynamic Manual) during Screening and at Week 6 following each study treatment o Screening standardised urodynamics must confirm the presence of NDO • Non-Urodynamic subset o All subjects in this subset must have documented urodynamic proven NDO in the 12 months prior to Screening. If not, then urodynamics must be performed per local practice during Screening to confirm the diagnosis of NDO o Urodynamics will not be performed in the post-screening period in this subset Eligibility will be assessed during Screening (up to 30 days per subject although can be extended in certain circumstances see Section 5.2.1) although can be extended in certain circumstances see Section 5.2.1). All subjects will complete study Baseline safety and efficacy evaluations (including bladder diary, urodynamics (if required) and patient-reported outcomes) during this period. Eligible subjects will be randomised to receive either 600 U Dysport®, 800 U Dysport®, or placebo during the initial IMP administration which will occur up to 14 days after screening period (can be extended where UTI preven...
General Design and Study Schema. This is a phase III, multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of two doses of Dysport® (600 U and 800 U) in adult subjects with SCI or MS with UI due to NDO, who have not been adequately managed with oral medication and who routinely require CIC to manage their bladder function. The study will be conducted at approximately 90 study sites and 330 subjects are planned. This study has two treatment periods: • A double-blind placebo controlled period, where subjects receive a single IMP treatment administration of either 600 U or 800 U Dysport® or placebo • A subsequent double blind active treatment period, where subjects can receive multiple active IMP retreatment administrations of either 600 U or 800 U Dysport®. This second period commences when subjects receive their first study retreatment. Eligibility will be assessed during Screening (up to 30 days per subject, although can be extended in certain circumstances see Section 5.2.1). All subjects will complete study Baseline safety and efficacy evaluations (including bladder diary, urodynamics and patient- reported outcomes) during this period. Eligible subjects will be randomised to receive either 600 U Dysport®, 800 U Dysport®, or placebo during the initial IMP administration which will occur up to 14 days after screening period (but can be extended where UTI prevents administration of IMP see Section 5.2.3. The IMP will be administered into the detrusor via cystoscopy divided into 30 injection points of 0.5 mL each, which will be evenly distributed throughout the detrusor (avoiding the trigone). See Section 6 for full details of the treatment procedure. Subjects will be followed-up by telephone at Week 1 and Week 4; and will attend clinic visits at Week 2, Week 6 (primary study timepoint), and Week 12. Thereafter telephone visits will be scheduled every 12 weeks until end of study (EOS), or until retreatment is required. Details of the procedures performed at each study visit are described in Section 0.

Related to General Design and Study Schema

  • Curriculum Development This includes the analysis and coordination of textual materials; constant review of current literature in the field, some of which are selected for the college library collection, the preparation of selective, descriptive materials such as outlines and syllabi; conferring with other faculty and administration on curricular problems; and, the attendance and participation in inter and intra-college conferences and advisory committees.

  • Technology Access Contractor expressly acknowledges that state funds may not be expended in connection with the purchase of an automated information system unless that system meets certain statutory requirements relating to accessibility by persons with visual impairments. Accordingly, Contractor represents and warrants to System Agency that the technology provided to System Agency for purchase (if applicable under this Contract or any related Solicitation) is capable, either by virtue of features included within the technology or because it is readily adaptable by use with other technology, of: • providing equivalent access for effective use by both visual and non-visual means; • presenting information, including prompts used for interactive communications, in formats intended for non-visual use; and • being integrated into networks for obtaining, retrieving, and disseminating information used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired. For purposes of this Section, the phrase “equivalent access” means a substantially similar ability to communicate with or make use of the technology, either directly by features incorporated within the technology or by other reasonable means such as assistive devices or services which would constitute reasonable accommodations under the Americans With Disabilities Act or similar state or federal laws. Examples of methods by which equivalent access may be provided include, but are not limited to, keyboard alternatives to mouse commands and other means of navigating graphical displays, and customizable display appearance. In accordance with Section 2157.005 of the Texas Government Code, the Technology Access Clause contract provision remains in effect for any contract entered into before September 1, 2006.

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • General Scope of Work The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for these SERVICES is described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The General Scope of Work was developed utilizing performance based contracting methodologies.

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Manufacturing Technology Transfer Upon AbbVie’s written request with respect to a given Collaboration CAR-T Product and Licensed Product, Caribou shall effect a full transfer to AbbVie or its designee (which designee may be an Affiliate or a Third Party Provider) of all Materials and Know-How Controlled by Caribou relating to the then-current process for the Manufacture of such Collaboration CAR-T Product and any corresponding Licensed Products (each, a “Manufacturing Process”). Caribou shall provide, shall cause its Affiliates to provide, and shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to assist AbbVie in causing all Third Party Providers to provide, all reasonable assistance requested by AbbVie to enable AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) to implement each Manufacturing Process at the facilities designated by AbbVie. If requested by AbbVie, such assistance shall include facilitating the entering into of agreements with applicable Third Party suppliers relating to such Collaboration CAR-T Product and any corresponding Licensed Products. Without limitation of the foregoing, in connection with the Manufacturing Process and related transfer: (a) Caribou shall, and shall cause its Affiliates to, make available to AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable), and shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to assist AbbVie in causing all Third Party Providers to make available to AbbVie, from time to time as AbbVie may request, all Materials and Manufacturing-related Know-How Controlled by Caribou relating to each Manufacturing Process, including methods, reagents and processes and testing/characterization Know-How, and all documentation constituting material support, performance advice, shop practice, standard operating procedures, specifications as to Materials to be used, and control methods, that are necessary or reasonably useful to enable AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party manufacturer, as applicable) to use and practice such Manufacturing Process; (b) Caribou shall cause all appropriate employees and representatives of Caribou and its Affiliates, and shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to assist AbbVie in causing all appropriate employees and representatives of Third Party Providers, to meet with employees or representatives of AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) at the applicable manufacturing facility at mutually convenient times to assist with the working up and use of each Manufacturing Process and with the training of the personnel of AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) to the extent necessary or reasonably useful to enable AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) to use and practice such Manufacturing Process; (c) Without limiting the generality of this Section 4.4.2, Caribou shall cause all appropriate analytical and quality control laboratory employees and representatives of Caribou and its Affiliates, and shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to assist AbbVie in causing all appropriate analytical and quality control laboratory employees and representatives of Third Party Providers, to meet with employees or representatives of AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) at the applicable manufacturing facility and make available all necessary equipment, at mutually convenient times, to support and execute the provision of all applicable analytical methods and the validation thereof (including all applicable Know-How, Information and Materials Controlled by Caribou, and sufficient supplies of all primary and other reference standards); (d) Caribou shall, and shall cause its Affiliates to, take such steps, and shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to assist AbbVie in causing Third Party Providers take such steps, as are necessary or reasonably useful to assist AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) in obtaining any necessary licenses, permits or approvals from Regulatory Authorities with respect to the Manufacture of the applicable Collaboration CAR-T Products and corresponding Licensed Products at the applicable facilities; and (e) Caribou shall, and shall cause its Affiliates to, provide, and shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to assist AbbVie in causing Third Party Providers to provide, such other assistance as AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) may reasonably request to enable AbbVie (or its Affiliate or designated Third Party Provider, as applicable) to use and practice each Manufacturing Process and otherwise to Manufacture the applicable Collaboration CAR-T Products and corresponding Licensed Products.

  • Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company, or in which the Company has participated, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to, where applicable, accepted professional and scientific standards for products or product candidates comparable to those being developed by the Company and all applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the FDA, the EMEA, Health Canada and other comparable drug and medical device (including diagnostic product) regulatory agencies outside of the United States to which they are subject; the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus do not contain any misstatement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make such statements not misleading; the Company has no knowledge of any studies, tests or trials not described in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus the results of which reasonably call into question in any material respect the results of the studies, tests and trials described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or Prospectus; and the Company has not received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA, EMEA, Health Canada or any other foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority or any Institutional Review Board or comparable authority requiring or threatening the termination, suspension or material modification of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company or in which the Company has participated, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no reasonable grounds for the same. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there has not been any violation of law or regulation by the Company in its respective product development efforts, submissions or reports to any regulatory authority that could reasonably be expected to require investigation, corrective action or enforcement action.

  • Project Implementation The Borrower shall:

  • Technology Access Fee After the Effective Date, within [***] days after receipt of the corresponding invoice from Mersana, Merck will pay to Mersana, a one-time, non-refundable, non-creditable, upfront fee of Twelve Million Dollars ($12,000,000.00) (the “Technology Access Fee”). Payment of the Technology Access Fee shall be subject to any withholding Tax obligations set forth in Section 6.9.1.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!