Immunogenicity Sample Clauses

Immunogenicity. Immune reactions and extra-ocular exposure to LUXTURNA in clinical studies were mild. No clinically significant cytotoxic T-cell response to either AAV2 or RPE65 has been observed. Study participants received systemic corticosteroids before and after subretinal injection of LUXTURNA to each eye, which may have decreased the potential immune reaction to either AAV2 or RPE65. Pediatric Use Treatment with LUXTURNA is not recommended for patients younger than 12 months of age, because the retinal cells are still undergoing cell proliferation, and LUXTURNA would potentially be diluted or lost during the cell proliferation. The safety and efficacy of LUXTURNA have been established in pediatric patients. There were no significant differences in safety between the different age subgroups. Please see the full U.S. Prescribing Information for LUXTURNA here. Clinical Trial Overview of LUXTURNA™ (voretigene neparvovec-rzyl) The safety and efficacy of LUXTURNA were assessed in one open-label, dose-exploration Phase 1 safety study (n=12) and one open-label, randomized, controlled Phase 3 efficacy and safety study (n=31) in pediatric and adult participants (range 4 to 44 years) with biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated retinal dystrophy and sufficient viable retinal cells. Of the 31 participants enrolled in the Phase 3 study, 21 were randomized to receive subretinal injection of LUXTURNA and 10 were randomized to the control (non-intervention) group. One participant in the intervention group discontinued from the study prior to treatment and one participant in the control group withdrew consent and was discontinued from the study. All nine participants randomized to the control group elected to crossover and receive LUXTURNA after one year of observation. All participants in these studies continue to be followed for long-term safety and efficacy. LUXTURNA Phase 3 clinical trial data, including data from the intervention group of all randomized participants through the one-year time point has been previously reported in (The Lancet). The efficacy of LUXTURNA in the Phase 3 study was established based on the multi-luminance mobility test (MLMT) score change from baseline to one year. MLMT was designed to measure changes in functional vision as assessed by the ability of a participant to navigate a course accurately and at a reasonable pace at seven different levels of illumination, ranging from 400 lux (corresponding to a brightly lit office) to one lux (corresponding to a ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Immunogenicity. Antibodies to golimumab were originally considered to be a rare phenomenon, leading to the premise that the drug had low immunogenic potential. This understanding was based upon data from the PURSUIT trial programme (Sandborn et al., 2014a; Sandborn et al., 2014b) and its subsequent PK sub-analysis (Xxxxxxxx et al., 2017), which described antibodies in very low numbers. These analyses were originally carried out using a drug- sensitive XXXXX developed by Xxxxxxx. Other studies, carried out subsequently but using similarly drug-sensitive assays, have shown correspondingly low rates of antibody detection, some even showing that no patients developed detectable antibodies. This assumption of limited immunogenicity has, however, more recently been demonstrated to, in fact, be an underestimation. Xxxxxx et al. (2016) were the first to describe the development of a drug- tolerant golimumab antibody ELISA and demonstrated that the rate of antibody detection increased from 0/21 patients using the drug-sensitive assay, to 4/21 (19%) with the drug- tolerant method (Xxxxxx et al., 2016). Similarly, re-analysis of the PURSUIT samples with a drug-tolerant assay showed a tenfold increase from 2.8% of patients to 21.8% testing positive for antibodies at some point during the 54 week maintenance trial (Adedokun et al., 2019). Whether a drug-sensitive or drug-tolerant assay is employed, combination therapy has been shown to reduce the rate of antibody formation. However, this difference is much more marked when using a drug-tolerant assay (Xxxxxxxx et al., 2017; Xxxxxxxx et al., 2019). Although antibodies to golimumab have been repeatedly shown to be a key determinant of its PK and (perhaps to a lesser degree) its efficacy, the exact impact of the additional antibodies detected using a drug-tolerant assay (i.e., in the presence of circulating drug) is not yet fully appreciated. Xxxxxxxx et al.’s (2019) analyses suggested that antibodies picked up by the drug-sensitive assay (i.e., in the absence of detectable drug) are likely to have a more significant deleterious effect on UC outcomes than those found using only the tolerant assay. The same finding was replicated in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis (Xxx et al., 2019) (see Table 6). Table 6 Summary of golimumab antidrug antibody detection with various assays (RA, rheumatoid arthritis; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; AS, ankylosing spondylitis) Study Year n Assay Drug...
Immunogenicity. Anti–IPP-201101 Ab testing will be performed at visit 2 (week 0; baseline/start of study drug treatment), visit 3 (week 2), visit 4 (week 4), visit 6 (week 12), visit 8 (week 20), visit 10 (week 28), visit 12 (week 36), visit 14 (week 44), and the final assessment (or early termination) (visit 16 [week 52]). All samples will be collected prior to administration of study drug at that particular visit. Any patient with a positive test result in the confirmatory assay at the final study visit will be followed with additional immunogenicity testing at 8-week intervals until the level returns to baseline value or the levels are judged by the investigator to be chronic, or the patient is lost to follow-up.

Related to Immunogenicity

  • Tests and Preclinical and Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or, to the Company’s knowledge, on behalf of the Company were and, if still ongoing, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to accepted professional scientific standards and all Authorizations and Applicable Laws, including, without limitation, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, “FFDCA”); the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are, to the Company’s knowledge, accurate in all material respects and fairly present the data derived from such studies, tests and trials; except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any studies, tests or trials, the results of which the Company believes reasonably call into question the study, test, or trial results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described and the clinical state of development; and, except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received any notices or correspondence from the FDA or any Governmental Entity requiring the termination or suspension of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company, other than ordinary course communications with respect to modifications in connection with the design and implementation of such trials, copies of which communications have been made available to you.

  • Clinical Studies The animal and other preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by the Company or on behalf of the Company were, and, if still pending are, to the Company’s knowledge, being conducted in all material respects in compliance with all Applicable Laws and in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls generally used by qualified experts in the preclinical study and clinical trials of new drugs and biologics as applied to comparable products to those being developed by the Company; the descriptions of the results of such preclinical studies and clinical trials contained in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus are accurate and complete in all material respects, and, except as set forth in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus, the Company has no knowledge of any other clinical trials or preclinical studies, the results of which reasonably call into question the clinical trial or preclinical study results described or referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described; and the Company has not received any written notices or correspondence from the FDA, the EMA, or any other domestic or foreign governmental agency requiring the termination, suspension or modification of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company that are described in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement and the Prospectus.

  • Studies The clinical, pre-clinical and other studies and tests conducted by or on behalf of or sponsored by the Company or its subsidiaries that are described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus were and, if still pending, are being conducted in accordance in all material respects with all statutes, laws, rules and regulations, as applicable (including, without limitation, those administered by the FDA or by any foreign, federal, state or local governmental or regulatory authority performing functions similar to those performed by the FDA). The descriptions of the results of such studies and tests that are described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly present the published data derived from such studies and tests, and each of the Company and its subsidiaries has no knowledge of other studies or tests the results of which are materially inconsistent with or otherwise call into question the results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus. Except as described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, neither the Company nor its subsidiaries has received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA or any other foreign, federal, state or local governmental or regulatory authority performing functions similar to those performed by the FDA with respect to any ongoing clinical or pre-clinical studies or tests requiring the termination or suspension of such studies or tests. For the avoidance of doubt, the Company makes no representation or warranty that the results of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company will be sufficient to obtain governmental approval from the FDA or any foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority.

  • Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company, or in which the Company has participated, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, or the results of which are referred to in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, were and, if still pending, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to, where applicable, accepted professional and scientific standards for products or product candidates comparable to those being developed by the Company and all applicable statutes, rules and regulations of the FDA, the EMEA, Health Canada and other comparable drug and medical device (including diagnostic product) regulatory agencies outside of the United States to which they are subject; the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or the Prospectus do not contain any misstatement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make such statements not misleading; the Company has no knowledge of any studies, tests or trials not described in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus the results of which reasonably call into question in any material respect the results of the studies, tests and trials described in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package or Prospectus; and the Company has not received any notices or other correspondence from the FDA, EMEA, Health Canada or any other foreign, state or local governmental body exercising comparable authority or any Institutional Review Board or comparable authority requiring or threatening the termination, suspension or material modification of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of, or sponsored by, the Company or in which the Company has participated, and, to the Company’s knowledge, there are no reasonable grounds for the same. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Time of Sale Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, there has not been any violation of law or regulation by the Company in its respective product development efforts, submissions or reports to any regulatory authority that could reasonably be expected to require investigation, corrective action or enforcement action.

  • Research Program 2.1 University will use reasonable efforts to conduct the Research Program described in Attachment A which is hereby incorporated in full by reference (“Research Program”), and will furnish the facilities necessary to carry out said Research Program. The Research Program will be under the direction of _____________________ (“Principal Investigator”), or his or her successor as mutually agreed to by the Parties and will be con­ducted by the Principal Investigator at the University.

  • Research Collaboration Upon FibroGen’s request, the Parties will discuss conducting a research program funded by AstraZeneca and directed toward franchise enhancement and lifecycle management for HIF Compounds or other topics that the Parties determine relevant to the Products and the Field. Upon agreement on the terms of such research program, the Parties will enter into a separate agreement or amend this Agreement accordingly.

  • Licensed Technology The term "Licensed Technology" shall mean the ------------------- Licensed Patents, plus all improvements thereto developed by Licensor, and all related data, know-how and technology.

  • Commercialization Intrexon shall have the right to develop and Commercialize the Reverted Products itself or with one or more Third Parties, and shall have the right, without obligation to Fibrocell, to take any such actions in connection with such activities as Intrexon (or its designee), at its discretion, deems appropriate.

  • Commercialization Diligence Novartis shall dedicate commercially reasonable efforts, during each [**] month period, necessary to commercialize a Licensed Product for a Profile, after receipt of Regulatory Approval therefor, in any of the U.S., Japan or the EU Major Market Countries. If Novartis commercializes a Licensed Product for a Profile, after receipt of Regulatory Approval therefor, in any of the U.S., Japan or the EU Major Market Countries, Novartis will be deemed to satisfy all diligence obligations with respect to such Profile.

  • Regulatory Materials (a) Alvogen shall have the sole right to control filing or submission of Regulatory Materials with the Regulatory Agencies in the Territory with respect to Product including the MAA Approval for Product and Regulatory Approvals in the Territory, subject to Section 3.2 and the oversight of and in consultation with the Executive Steering Committee, and [***]Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed. shall be responsible for managing all communications and interactions with the Regulatory Agencies in the Territory with respect to Product in the Territory. In all cases, prior to the filing of any Regulatory Materials (including the MAA for Product) for Product with the applicable Regulatory Agency, Alvogen shall provide a copy thereof to Pfenex (through the Executive Steering Committee) for its review and comment. Pfenex shall have fifteen (15) Business Days from the date it receives a copy of any Regulatory Materials with respect to the Product to provide Alvogen with comments regarding such Regulatory Materials, unless the Regulatory Agencies in the Territory or Applicable Law requires that such Regulatory Material(s) be filed on a timeline that does not reasonably permit such advanced notice, in which case Pfenex shall have as much time as is reasonably practicable to provide Alvogen with comments. Alvogen shall consider all such comments in good faith. Alvogen shall, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, provide Pfenex with (i) reasonable advanced notice (and in no event less than fifteen (15) Business Days’ advance notice whenever feasible) of substantive meetings with any Regulatory Agency in the Territory that are either scheduled with or initiated by or on behalf of Alvogen or its Affiliates, (ii) an opportunity to have a reasonable number (but at least two (2)) representatives participate in all substantive meetings with the Regulatory Agencies in the Territory with respect to Product, and in any case keep Pfenex informed as to all material interactions with the Regulatory Agencies in the Territory with respect to Product, and (iii) a copy of any material documents, information and correspondence submitted to or received from the Regulatory Agencies in the Territory with respect to Product as soon as reasonably practicable.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.