Interagency Review Team Sample Clauses

Interagency Review Team. Whereas, in consideration of the establishment and maintenance of the ILF Program, the Interagency Review Team is willing to award ILF credits in accordance with the procedures outlined in this Instrument. These ILF credits will be made available to serve as compensatory mitigation pursuant to applicable Federal and Washington State laws and regulations. The Corps and Ecology serve as Co-Chairs of the IRT [revise Co-Chairs if necessary]. The IRT is the group of Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies that has reviewed, and will advise the Co-Chairs regarding, the establishment and management of the ILF Program pursuant to the provisions of the Instrument. The IRT consists of [edit the below list as applicable]: Co-Chair: District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District (District Engineer) or his designee. Co-Chair: Washington State Department of Ecology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington Department of Natural Resources.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interagency Review Team. The Corps’ District Engineer has established an Interagency Review Team for the ILF Program. The District Engineer or designee is the official chair for the IRT and will be responsible for establishing the IRT and managing the IRT process. The District Engineer will make the final decision regarding the amount and type of compensatory mitigation to be required of federal permittees, and determine whether and how use of credits from the ILF Program is appropriate to compensate for unavoidable impacts. The primary role of the IRT is to assist the Corps in its administration of the Instrument, evaluate mitigation project plans, recommend mitigation measures, review approval of credit release and certification, review monitoring reports, and advise the Corps regarding modifications to this instrument. The IRT’s role and responsibilities are more fully set forth in Section 332.8 of the Federal Mitigation Rule (33 CFR Part 332). IRT participation does not, however, override or nullify the independent permitting authority of a Federal, State or local permitting entity to enforce their permit requirements at compensatory mitigation project sites. The ILF Program IRT will consist of: • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District (Chair) • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 • Montana Department of Environmental Quality • Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service The IRT will review and provide comments on the Instrument and subsequent modifications. IRT members will also review and provide written comments on mitigation project plans, annual monitoring reports and field inspections, and credit release and certification requests. The IRT agencies may also be requested to provide expertise on other related matters, such as assessing the achievement of performance standards, reviewing long-term management plans, and recommending corrective actions or adaptive management. Written comments will be submitted within the time limits established by 33 CFR 332.8. Comments received after such deadlines will only be considered at the discretion of the District Engineer to the extent that doing so does not jeopardize the deadlines for actions required of the District Engineer. The IRT for individual ILF projects may be augmented, at the discretion of the District Engineer in consultation with MARS, with additional representatives from Tribal, Federal, State, or local governments. Additional members of the IRT for individual ILF ...
Sample 1
Interagency Review Team. Whereas, in consideration of the establishment and maintenance of the ILF Program, the Corps and Ecology, in consultation with the Interagency Review Team, is willing to award ILF credits in accordance with the procedures outlined in this Instrument. These ILF credits will be made available to serve as compensatory mitigation pursuant to applicable Federal and Washington State laws and regulations. The Corps and Ecology serve as Co-Chairs of the IRT [revise Co-Chairs if necessary]. The IRT is the group of Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies that has reviewed, and will advise the Co-Chairs regarding, the establishment and management of the ILF Program pursuant to the provisions of the Instrument. The IRT consists of [edit the below list as applicable]: Co-Chair: District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District (District Engineer) or his designee. Co-Chair: Washington State Department of Ecology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington Department of Natural Resources.
Sample 1
Interagency Review Team. Corps: Xx. Xxxxxx X. Cameron Chief, Regulatory Branch St. Xxxx District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxx 000 Xx. Xxxx, MN 55101-1678 EPA: Xx. Xxx Xxxxxx USEPA, Region 5 00 Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Chicago, IL 60604-3590 FWS: Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 0000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Drive New Xxxxxxx, WI 54229-9565 Wisconsin DNR: Xx. Xxx Xxxxxxx, Wetland Mitigation Coordinator Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources 000 X. Xxxxxxx St. - WT/3 Madison, WI 53707-7921 NRCS: Xx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, State Biologist USDA, NRCS 0000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 List of Appendices Appendix A: Compensation Site Plan Appendix B: Property Survey and Legal Description Appendix C: Map – Bank Service Area Appendix D: Model WDNR Conservation Easement Form Appendix E: Model Performance Bond
Sample 1

Related to Interagency Review Team

  • Policy Review Patent Policy and related Procedures shall be reviewed every five (5) years.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • Peer Assistance and Review Program 1. MCEA and MCPS agree to jointly operate a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program. The PAR Program is a mechanism for maintaining systemwide quality control and ensuring that all MCPS teachers responsible for teaching students are functioning at or above the high MCPS standards of performance. It provides intensive assistance for any teacher who has not yet achieved that standard or who falls below acceptable standards. Assistance and review are provided to both experienced MCPS teachers in need of significant improvement and teachers in their first year of teaching.

  • Claims Review Objective A clear statement of the objective intended to be achieved by the Claims Review.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.