INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL Sample Clauses

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. 32. Without prejudice to these Rules of Procedure, meetings of the International Review Panel ("IRP") shall be conducted in accordance with the rules established by Xxxxx XXX, paragraphs 5-14, of the Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The functions of the International Review Panel (IRP), established pursuant to the La Jolla Agreement, shall be those set forth in Annex VII. The IRP shall be composed and shall operate in accordance with the provisions of Xxxxx XXX.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 2006, the IRP consisted of 20 members: the 14 participating member governments, and six representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), three from environmental organizations and three from the tuna industry. The IRP held the following meetings during 2006: Meeting Venue Dates 41 Busan, Korea June 20 42 Del Mar, California, USA October 25 The minutes of these meetings are available on the IATTC’s website. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.
Sample 1See All (5)
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing opera- tions to the governments concerned. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of infor- mation pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with juris- diction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The gov- ernments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 2010, the IRP consisted of 20 members: the 14 participating member governments, and 6 repre- sentatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), 3 from environmental organizations and 3 from the tuna industry. The IRP held the following meetings during 2010: Meeting Venue Dates
Sample 1
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. ‌ The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting to the governments con- cerned non-compliance by their vessels with measures established by the AIDCP. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent by the Secretariat to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel. Several categories of possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. Governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. The IRP met on 16 August 2021, and on 13 October 2021 in La Jolla, California, USA. The minutes of IRP meetings are available on the IATTC website, along with the other documents posted for each set of meetings. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.
Sample 1
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. After each fishing trip the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. The IRP held the following meetings during 2001: Meeting Venue Dates 26 La Jolla, California January 29-30 27 San Salvador, El Salvador June 27
Sample 1
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. ‌ The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting to the governments con- cerned non-compliance by their vessels with measures established by the AIDCP. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent by the Secretariat to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel. Several categories of possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. Governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. The IRP did not meet in 2020 due to the restrictions caused by the pandemic. Any AIDCP decision that required interaction from the IRP was done by email messaging and presented at the 41st Meeting of the Parties of the AIDCP for approval. There was no review of possible infractions during 2020.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL

  • Departmental Review If informal resolution of the problem through conciliation and negotiation cannot be effected, an aggrieved person may file a formal complaint with the departmental affirmative action coordinator or other designated official. Such a complaint must be filed on a form provided for this purpose and within five working days after the attempted resolution of the problem by the equal employment opportunity counselor or within twenty-five (25) working days after the date of the alleged discriminatory action, whichever shall first occur. The affirmative action coordinator will decide whether the complaint falls within the jurisdiction of the procedure and accept or reject it. Upon acceptance of the complaint, the affirmative action coordinator shall obtain the notes on the case from the equal employment opportunity counselor; may conduct a prompt, impartial investigation if he deems it necessary; shall explore the possibility of resolving the problem through negotiation or conciliation; shall present findings and recommendations on resolving the complaint to the agency/department head; and within forty-five (45) working days from the date the formal complaint was filed, shall present his written decision, as approved by the agency/department head, to the complainant, with a copy of the complaint and decision to be forwarded to the director of personnel.

  • Medical Review Officer The Medical Review Officer (MRO) shall be a licensed physician who has a knowledge of substance abuse disorders and has appropriate medical training to interpret and evaluate an individual’s positive test result together with the employee’s medical history and any other relevant biomedical information.

  • Financial Review You agree to provide us with a financial statement or information on your financial condition upon our request.

  • Arbitration Board If the grievance is to be heard by a three-member arbitration board, the Union and the Employer shall each appoint a member of the arbitration board within five (5) days of notice of arbitration in accordance with Article

  • Grievance Commissioner System This is to confirm the discussion of the parties during collective bargaining that they are committed to encouraging early discussion and resolution of labour relations issues at the local level and seek to resolve grievances in a timely and cost efficient manner. To that end, this is to confirm that pursuant to Article 8, the parties agree that the Employer and Union at individual nursing homes may agree to utilize the following process in order to resolve a particular grievance through the utilization of a joint mediation-arbitration procedure:

  • SCHOOL STAFF COMMITTEES 1. If the majority of the teaching staff in the school so decide, there shall be established a recognized staff committee in that school.

  • Grievance Committee The Hospital will recognize a Grievance Committee composed of the Chief Xxxxxxx and not more than (as set out in Local Provisions Appendix) employees selected by the Union who have completed their probationary period. A general representative of the Union may be present at any meeting of the Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to deal with complaints or grievances as set out in this Collective Agreement. The Union shall keep the Hospital notified in writing of the names of the members of the Grievance Committee appointed or selected under this Article as well as the effective date of their respective appointments. A Committee member shall suffer no loss of earnings for time spent during their regular scheduled working hours in attending grievance meetings with the Hospital up to, but not including arbitration. The number of employees on the Grievance Committee shall be determined locally.

  • Union Grievance Committee (a) The Employer shall recognize a Union Grievance Committee which consists of:

  • Recognition of Union Stewards and Grievance Committee In order to provide an orderly and speedy procedure for the settling of grievances, the Employer acknowledges the rights and duties of the Union Stewards. The Xxxxxxx shall assist any Employee, which the Xxxxxxx represents, in preparing and presenting her grievance in accordance with the grievance procedure.

  • Arbitration Board Hearings Where operational requirements permit, the Employer shall grant leave without loss of pay to a reasonable number of employees representing the Union before an Arbitration Board, provided the dispute involves the Employer.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.