INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL Sample Clauses

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. 32. Without prejudice to these Rules of Procedure, meetings of the International Review Panel ("IRP") shall be conducted in accordance with the rules established by Xxxxx XXX, paragraphs 5-14, of the Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The functions of the International Review Panel (IRP), established pursuant to the La Jolla Agreement, shall be those set forth in Annex VII. The IRP shall be composed and shall operate in accordance with the provisions of Xxxxx XXX.
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 2005, the IRP consisted of 21 members: the 15 participating governments that have accepted the Agreement, and six representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), three from environmental organizations and three from the tuna industry. The IRP held the following meetings during 2005: Meeting Venue Dates 38 La Jolla, California February 16 39 Lanzarote, Spain June 14 40 La Jolla, California October 19 The minutes of these meetings are available on the HTUIATTC’s websiteUTH. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. ‌ The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting to the governments con- cerned non-compliance by their vessels with measures established by the AIDCP. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent by the Secretariat to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel. Several categories of possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. Governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. The IRP met on 16 August 2021, and on 13 October 2021 in La Jolla, California, USA. The minutes of IRP meetings are available on the IATTC website, along with the other documents posted for each set of meetings. Tables 8-9 and Appendix A of this report summarize possible infractions identified by the Panel at these meetings and subsequent action taken by the governments.
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. ‌ The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing opera- tions to the governments concerned. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of infor- mation pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with juris- diction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The gov- ernments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. During 2011, the IRP consisted of 20 members: the 14 participating member governments, and 6 repre- sentatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), 3 from environmental organizations and 3 from the tuna industry. The IRP held one meeting during 2011: Meeting Venue Dates 50 Del Mar, California, USA 20 October The minutes of IRP meetings are available on the IATTC’s website.
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. After each fishing trip the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. The IRP held the following meetings during 2001: Meeting Venue Dates 26 La Jolla, California January 29-30 27 San Salvador, El Salvador June 27
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting the compliance by vessels with measures established by the AIDCP for minimizing the mortalities of dolphins during fishing operations to the governments concerned. After each fishing trip the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel by the Secretariat. Certain possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. The governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. The IRP held the following meetings during 2002: Meeting Venue Dates 29 La Jolla, California January 31-February 2 30 Manzanillo, Mexico June 19-20 31 La Jolla, California October 8-9 The minutes of these meetings are available on the IATTC’s website (xxx.xxxxx.xxx). The IRP also publishes an annual report, presented to the Meeting of the Parties, which summarizes the activities, actions and decisions of the Panel and lists the possible infractions identified for the various national fleets.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL. ‌ The International Review Panel (IRP) follows a general procedure for reporting to the governments con- cerned non-compliance by their vessels with measures established by the AIDCP. During each fishing trip, the observer prepares a summary of information pertinent to dolphin mortalities, and this is sent by the Secretariat to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel. Several categories of possible infractions are automatically reported to the government with jurisdiction over the vessel in question; the IRP reviews the observer data for other cases at its meetings, and any cases identified as possible infractions are likewise reported to the relevant government. Governments report back to the IRP on actions taken regarding these possible infractions. The IRP did not meet in 2020 due to the restrictions caused by the pandemic. Any AIDCP decision that required interaction from the IRP was done by email messaging and presented at the 41st Meeting of the Parties of the AIDCP for approval. There was no review of possible infractions during 2020.

Related to INTERNATIONAL REVIEW PANEL

  • Financial Review You agree to provide us with a financial statement or information on your financial condition upon our request.

  • Arbitration Board Where the parties agree to a Board of Arbitration, the party referring the grievance to arbitration shall also provide the name of that party’s nominee to the Board of Arbitration. Within ten (10) days thereafter, the other party shall answer by registered mail, indicating the name and address of its nominee to the Board of Arbitration. The selection of the Chair shall be in accordance with the list of arbitrators above.

  • SCHOOL STAFF COMMITTEES 1. If the majority of the teaching staff in the school so decide, there shall be established a recognized staff committee in that school.

  • Grievance Committee The Hospital will recognize a Grievance Committee composed of the Chief Xxxxxxx and not more than (as set out in Local Provisions Appendix) employees selected by the Union who have completed their probationary period. A general representative of the Union may be present at any meeting of the Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to deal with complaints or grievances as set out in this Collective Agreement. The Union shall keep the Hospital notified in writing of the names of the members of the Grievance Committee appointed or selected under this Article as well as the effective date of their respective appointments. A Committee member shall suffer no loss of earnings for time spent during their regular scheduled working hours in attending grievance meetings with the Hospital up to, but not including arbitration. The number of employees on the Grievance Committee shall be determined locally.

  • Recognition of Union Stewards and Grievance Committee In order to provide an orderly and speedy procedure for the settling of grievances, the Employer acknowledges the rights and duties of the Union Stewards. The Xxxxxxx shall assist any Employee, which the Xxxxxxx represents, in preparing and presenting her grievance in accordance with the grievance procedure.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!