– Introduction & Overview The Mississippi Sample Clauses

– Introduction & Overview The Mississippi. NRCS has developed a process to comply with requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and 36CFR800. Our agency mission results in many small actions on private land in which federal involvement may be planning assistance, technical advice, project design, cost sharing, purchase of easements, and/or approval. NHPA requires that NRCS take into account the effects of its actions on historic properties. Federal regulations, 36CFR800, identify how to comply with section 106 of NHPA. The Mississippi NRCS compliance process detailed in this handbook identifies the appropriate level of effort that is commensurate with the nature of potential effects and the degree of federal involvement. This process will meet NRCS’s legal requirements and avoid adverse effects to significant cultural resources in Mississippi. It is NRCS policy to consider cultural resources early in the planning process. This means that upon identification of an undertaking, a cultural resources review should be completed. If the information on potential cultural concerns is identified early, the undertaking can be designed to avoid potentially significant resources or areas of potential cultural concern. Completing the cultural resources review prior to initiating contracts or other commitments can prevent delays and contract modifications. The compliance process works best when sufficient time is allowed for each step. Most cultural resources compliance reviews are completed upon a determination of negative results for the field inspection and site file review. However, if the site file review or field inspection results in the identification of cultural resources, a cultural resources survey may need to be conducted by a Cultural Resources Specialist (CRS). The CRS will also evaluate the potential for cultural resources to be present within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) based on physiographic setting, the extent of previous disturbances, soils and geomorphology, and the distribution of previously recorded resources in the vicinity of the APE. If these factors indicate a high probability for undocumented cultural resources, a cultural resources survey may be necessary. It is best to schedule archaeological survey during periods when bare ground is visible. At other times, ground preparation (such as disking previously plowed fields) or subsurface testing may be required. This adds time and cost to the undertaking. If the survey identifies cultural resources within the A...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to – Introduction & Overview The Mississippi

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED ENGINEERING SERVICES A. General construction work for buildings (CPC 512) 1) Unbound* 2) None 3) None 1) Unbound* 2) None 3) None

  • Allocation and use of scarce resources Any procedures for the allocation and use of scarce resources, including frequencies, numbers and rights of way, will be carried out in an objective, timely, transparent and non-discriminatory manner. The current state of allocated frequency bands will be made publicly available, but detailed identification of frequencies allocated for specific government uses is not required.

  • Project Overview The Statement of Work (SOW) documents the Project Scope, methodology, roles and responsibilities, implementation Stages, and deliverables for the implementation of Tyler products. The Project goals are to offer City of Xxxxx Creek, GA the opportunity to make the City more accessible and responsive to external and internal customer needs and more efficient in its operations through:  Streamlining, automating, and integrating business processes and practices  Providing tools to produce and access information in a real‐time environment  Enabling and empowering users to become more efficient, productive and responsive  Successfully overcoming current challenges and meeting future goals

  • LOT OVERVIEW This Contract encompasses the Lots listed in Appendix D – Contractor and Reseller Information. The following descriptions, as applicable, delineate the scope of the awarded Lots.

  • Construction Progress Schedule A schedule indicating proposed activity sequences and durations, milestone dates for receipt and approval of pertinent information, preparation, submittal, and processing of Shop Drawings and Samples, delivery of materials or equipment requiring long-lead time procurement, and proposed date(s) of Material Completion and Occupancy and Final Completion. The schedule will be developed to represent the sixteen or seventeen CSI Specification Divisions. It shall have a minimum number of activities as required to adequately represent to Owner the complete scope of work and define the Project’s critical path and associated activities. If the Project is to be phased, then each individual Phase should be identified from start through completion of the overall Project and should be individually scheduled and described, including any Owner’s occupancy requirements and showing portions of the Project having occupancy priority. The format of the schedule will have dependencies indicated on a monthly grid identifying milestone dates such as construction start, phase construction, structural top out, dry-in, rough-in completion, metal stud and drywall completion, equipment installation, systems operational, Material Completion and Occupancy Date, final inspection dates, Punchlist, and Final Completion date.

  • Participating TO's Interconnection Facilities Construction The Participating TO's Interconnection Facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Good Utility Practice. Upon request, within one hundred twenty (120) Calendar Days after the Commercial Operation Date, unless the Participating TO and Interconnection Customer agree on another mutually acceptable deadline, the Participating TO shall deliver to the Interconnection Customer and the CAISO the following “as-built” drawings, information and documents for the Participating TO's Interconnection Facilities [include appropriate drawings and relay diagrams]. The Participating TO will obtain control for operating and maintenance purposes of the Participating TO's Interconnection Facilities and Stand Alone Network Upgrades upon completion of such facilities. Pursuant to Article 5.2, the CAISO will obtain Operational Control of the Stand Alone Network Upgrades prior to the Commercial Operation Date.

  • Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities Construction The Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Good Utility Practice. Within one hundred twenty (120) Calendar Days after the Commercial Operation Date, unless the Participating TO and Interconnection Customer agree on another mutually acceptable deadline, the Interconnection Customer shall deliver to the Participating TO and CAISO “as-built” drawings, information and documents for the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities and the Electric Generating Unit(s), such as: a one-line diagram, a site plan showing the Large Generating Facility and the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities, plan and elevation drawings showing the layout of the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities, a relay functional diagram, relaying AC and DC schematic wiring diagrams and relay settings for all facilities associated with the Interconnection Customer's step-up transformers, the facilities connecting the Large Generating Facility to the step-up transformers and the Interconnection Customer’s Interconnection Facilities, and the impedances (determined by factory tests) for the associated step-up transformers and the Electric Generating Units. The Interconnection Customer shall provide the Participating TO and the CAISO specifications for the excitation system, automatic voltage regulator, Large Generating Facility control and protection settings, transformer tap settings, and communications, if applicable. Any deviations from the relay settings, machine specifications, and other specifications originally submitted by the Interconnection Customer shall be assessed by the Participating TO and the CAISO pursuant to the appropriate provisions of this LGIA and the LGIP.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Information regarding Interconnection Facilities 4.2.1 The SPD shall be required to obtain all information from the STU/CTU/concerned authority with regard to the Interconnection Facilities as is reasonably necessary to enable it to design, install and operate all interconnection plant and apparatus on the SPD’s side of the Delivery Point to enable delivery of electricity at the Delivery Point. The transmission of power up to the point of interconnection where the metering is done for energy accounting shall be the responsibility of the SPD at his own cost.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.