IPA's Position Sample Clauses

IPA's Position. The IPA notes that the Act imposes on Ameren the ultimate responsibility to design, develop and file energy efficiency ("EE") and demand response ("DR") measures and plans with the Commission, however, Ameren shares with the DCEO the obligation to implement EE programs, while Ameren maintains exclusive control over implementing DR programs. The IPA states that Ameren is required to implement programs and measures to achieve at least 75% of the EE statutory targets, and DCEO is required to implement programs to achieve 25% of the statutory target. While DCEO is required to implement 25% of the targets, the IPA states that the costs associated with DCEO and Ameren’s EE programs are not allocated pro rata. The IPA asserts that if DCEO is unable to meet its annual energy efficiency savings goal of 25%, then Ameren and DCEO are required to jointly submit a proposal to the Commission explaining the performance shortfall, and recommending an appropriate modification to the plan. The IPA opines that the Act does not give Ameren an opportunity to request a modification of its plan from the Commission if DCEO expects to fall short of the statutorily mandated EE savings; the modification to the statutory obligation occurs only after DCEO tries, but fails to achieve the statutory obligation. The IPA avers that if Ameren fails to meet its required efficiency standards after three years, the responsibility for implementing the energy efficiency measures shall be transferred to the IPA.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
IPA's Position. The IPA states that “Demand-response” is defined in Illinois as “measures that decrease peak electricity demand or shift demand from peak to off-peak periods.” 20 ILCS 3855/1-10. In its September 30, 2010 filing, the IPA notes that Ameren proposed a single DR program its refers to as a “Voltage Optimization” program, in which Ameren would install “Volt/VAR” devices to manage voltage and reactive power through its distribution and feeder systems. The IPA avers that the "Volt/VAR" devices are not actual demand reponse devices, but instead would help Ameren maintain a flatter distribution circuit profile while still delivering to customers acceptable voltage at the end of the circuit. The IPA notes that Ameren indicates this program would permit Ameren to control loads eight times per year for four hours per event, resulting in 32 hours of load reduction. However, the program is intended to be "behind the scenes" with "no detectable impact to households" and will cause no change in behavior by the customer. The IPA believes the evidence shows that if implemented, the impact should reduce annual MW load by 4.5 MW per year. The IPA asserts that most Intervenors argue against the Voltage Optimization proposal, while Staff recommended that that the Commission reject Ameren’s proposed DR program, but order Ameren to conduct a pilot of the Voltage Optimization Program to determine if the program actually works. The IPA notes that in response to this criticism, Ameren revised its proposal and removed the Voltage Optimization Program from its proposed plan and increased its energy efficiency budgets and targets accordingly. The IPA states that the net result of Ameren’s revision is that it proposes no DR program at all for the period from June 1, 2011 to May 31, 2014, and therefore Ameren’s proposed energy efficiency and demand response plan is not only deficient, but unlawful and contrary to Section 8-103(c). The IPA also opines that there is no evidence in the record that the Voltage Optimization Program is an adequate demand response program that complies with Ameren’s obligation to reduce customer demand during peak load, or to shift demand from peak to off- peak. Some parties have suggested that Ameren be given credit for this EE measure in satisfying its obligations under Section 8-103(e). Xx. Xxxxxxxxx asserts that capturing peak savings through the residential EE programs can be viewed as meeting the statute’s requirements for incremental DR resources of 0.1%...

Related to IPA's Position

  • EMPLOYMENT Company hereby employs Executive, and Executive hereby accepts such employment, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein.

  • Services FASC agrees to provide to the Adviser the services indicated in Exhibit A to this Agreement (the “Services”).

  • Deliverables Upon satisfactory completion of the work authorization, the Engineer shall submit the deliverables as specified in the executed work authorization to the State for review and acceptance.

  • Effective Date The obligations of the Lenders to make Loans and of the Issuing Bank to issue Letters of Credit hereunder shall not become effective until the date on which each of the following conditions is satisfied (or waived in accordance with Section 9.02):

  • Dimensions Education Bachelor’s or Master’s Degree in Computer Science, Information Systems, or other related field. Or equivalent work experience. Experience: A minimum of 5 years of IT work experience with demonstrated knowledge in architecture design, software development, database management systems and systems integration in multi-platform environments.

  • MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 3.01 The Union acknowledges that all management rights and prerogatives are vested exclusively with the Employer and without limiting the generality of the foregoing; it is the exclusive function of the Employer:

  • Confidential Information The Executive shall hold in a fiduciary capacity for the benefit of the Company all secret or confidential information, knowledge or data relating to the Company or any of its affiliated companies, and their respective businesses, which shall have been obtained by the Executive during the Executive's employment by the Company or any of its affiliated companies and which shall not be or become public knowledge (other than by acts by the Executive or representatives of the Executive in violation of this Agreement). After termination of the Executive's employment with the Company, the Executive shall not, without the prior written consent of the Company or as may otherwise be required by law or legal process, communicate or divulge any such information, knowledge or data to anyone other than the Company and those designated by it. In no event shall an asserted violation of the provisions of this Section 10 constitute a basis for deferring or withholding any amounts otherwise payable to the Executive under this Agreement.

  • Relationship of the Parties Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to make one Party an agent of the other Party nor shall either party have any authority to bind the other in any respect, unless expressly authorized by the other party in writing. The Parties are independent contractors and nothing in this Agreement creates a relationship of employment, trust, agency or partnership between them.

  • Independent Contractor The Contractor and its employees, agents, representatives, and subcontractors are independent contractors and not employees or agents of the State of Florida and are not entitled to State of Florida benefits. The Department and Customer will not be bound by any acts or conduct of the Contractor or its employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors. The Contractor agrees to include this provision in all its subcontracts under the Contract.

  • Intellectual Property The Company and the Subsidiaries have, or have rights to use, all patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, service marks, trade names, trade secrets, inventions, copyrights, licenses and other intellectual property rights and similar rights necessary or required for use in connection with their respective businesses as described in the SEC Reports and which the failure to so have could have a Material Adverse Effect (collectively, the “Intellectual Property Rights”). None of, and neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received a notice (written or otherwise) that any of, the Intellectual Property Rights has expired, terminated or been abandoned, or is expected to expire or terminate or be abandoned, within two (2) years from the date of this Agreement. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received, since the date of the latest audited financial statements included within the SEC Reports, a written notice of a claim or otherwise has any knowledge that the Intellectual Property Rights violate or infringe upon the rights of any Person, except as could not have or reasonably be expected to not have a Material Adverse Effect. To the knowledge of the Company, all such Intellectual Property Rights are enforceable and there is no existing infringement by another Person of any of the Intellectual Property Rights. The Company and its Subsidiaries have taken reasonable security measures to protect the secrecy, confidentiality and value of all of their intellectual properties, except where failure to do so could not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.