Common use of Joint Job Evaluation Committee Clause in Contracts

Joint Job Evaluation Committee. A Joint Job Evaluation Committee (JJEC) shall be formed, comprised of three (3) appointed representatives each, selected by each party to this agreement, who shall be empowered to make job rating decisions on behalf of that party. Meetings of the JJEC shall require at least two (2) appointed representatives from each party. An equal number of appointed decision-making representatives of each party will be in attendance before the meeting will proceed. The parties agree to schedule JJEC meetings at agreed-upon regular intervals, at a minimum of every month to attend to any outstanding job evaluation matters. Additional meetings may be scheduled to accommodate any backlog. Resource people and observers may attend meetings. The College shall provide a resource person from the Human Resources Department. The JJEC shall conduct a comprehensive review of all positions every five (5) years (Nov. 2001). The Union and the College agree that the primary function of the JJEC shall be to determine the rating of new positions, and the adjustment of position ratings as a result of reconsiderations. The JJEC may make recommendation for changes to the procedures, modifications to the process or supporting documents. These recommendations shall be forwarded to the Joint Standing Committee for resolution. When there is a direct or perceived conflict of interest or a committee member belongs to the same department as the incumbent(s), the committee member shall absent themselves from the discussion and from the decision-making on the position’s rating.

Joint Job Evaluation Committee. A Joint Job Evaluation Committee (JJEC) shall be formed, comprised of three (3) appointed representatives each, selected by each party to this agreement, who shall be empowered to make job rating decisions on behalf of that party. Meetings of the JJEC shall require at least two (2) appointed representatives from each party. An equal number of appointed decision-making representatives of each party will be in attendance before the meeting will proceed. The parties agree to schedule JJEC meetings at agreed-upon regular intervals, at a minimum of every month to attend to any outstanding job evaluation matters. Additional meetings may be scheduled to accommodate any backlog. Resource people and observers may attend meetings. The College shall provide a resource person from the Human Resources Department. The JJEC shall conduct a comprehensive review of all positions every five (5) years (Nov. 2001). The Union and the College agree that the primary function of the JJEC shall be to determine the rating of new positions, and the adjustment of position ratings as a result of reconsiderations. The JJEC may make recommendation for changes to the procedures, modifications to the process or supporting documents. These recommendations shall be forwarded to the Joint Standing Committee for resolution. When there is a direct or perceived conflict of interest or a committee member belongs to the same department as the incumbent(s), the committee member shall absent themselves from the discussion and from the decision-making on the position’s rating.

Joint Job Evaluation Committee. A Joint Job Evaluation Committee (JJEC) shall be formed, comprised of three (3) appointed representatives each, selected by each party to this agreement, who shall be empowered to make job rating decisions on behalf of that party. Meetings of the JJEC shall require at least two (2) appointed representatives from each party. An equal number of appointed decision-making representatives of each party will be in attendance before the meeting will proceed. The parties agree to schedule JJEC meetings at agreed-upon regular intervals, at a minimum of every month to attend to any outstanding job evaluation matters. Additional meetings may be scheduled to accommodate any backlog. Resource people and observers may attend meetings. The College shall provide a resource person from the Human Resources Department. The JJEC shall conduct a comprehensive review of all positions every five (5) years (Nov. 2001). The Union and the College agree that the primary function of the JJEC shall be to determine the rating of new positions, and the adjustment of position ratings as a result of reconsiderations. The JJEC may make recommendation for changes to the procedures, modifications to the process or supporting documents. These recommendations shall be forwarded to the Joint Standing Committee for resolution. When there is a direct or perceived conflict of interest or a committee member belongs to the same department as the incumbent(s), the committee member shall absent themselves from the discussion and from the decision-making on the position’s rating.themselves

Joint Job Evaluation Committee. A Joint Job Evaluation Committee (JJEC) shall be formed, comprised of three (3) appointed representatives each, selected by each party to this agreement, who shall be empowered to make job rating decisions on behalf of that party. Meetings of the JJEC shall require at least two (2) appointed representatives from each party. An equal number of appointed decision-making representatives of each party will be in attendance before the meeting will proceed. The parties agree to schedule JJEC meetings at agreed-upon regular intervals, at a minimum of every month to attend to any outstanding job evaluation matters. Additional meetings may be scheduled to accommodate any backlog. Resource people and observers may attend meetings. The College shall provide a resource person from the Human Resources Department. The JJEC shall conduct a comprehensive review of all positions every five (5) years (Nov. 2001). * The Union and the College agree that the primary function of the JJEC shall be to determine the rating of new positions, and the adjustment of position ratings as a result of reconsiderations. The JJEC may make recommendation for changes to the procedures, modifications to the process or supporting documents. These recommendations shall be forwarded to the Joint Standing Committee for resolution. When there is a direct or perceived conflict of interest or a committee member belongs to the same department as the incumbent(s), the committee member shall absent themselves from the discussion and from the decision-making on the position’s rating.