Opportunity Evaluation Sample Clauses

Opportunity Evaluation. Program leadership will consult with Facility personnel at least once each year for the purpose of evaluating the Opportunity at the Facility, in an effort to continually provide an appropriate learning environment for the participating Students. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Opportunity Evaluation. Upon CMI being presented with potential opportunities to participate in Prospects generated by third parties ("Selling Parties"), CMI shall determine when or if a potential Prospect may be worthy of further consideration, and as to each potential Prospect, CMI shall immediately notify Reef, providing a brief description of the Prospect, to include when available, location, Operator, estimated leasehold and seismic costs and initial well costs, water depth and reserve potential (collectively, the "Initial Prospect Information"). Reef shall then promptly advise CMI whether Reef is already pursuing the Prospect; and, if such is the case, Reef shall advise CMI as to whether it will continue to pursue the Prospect on its own or jointly with CMI under either the terms of this Agreement or on other mutually acceptable terms. If Reef elects to continue to pursue the Prospect on its own, the parties shall endeavor in good faith to resolve any areas of competition, if possible. If Reef does not so notify CMI of its separate pursuit of any such potential Prospect(s) within ten (10) days after such initial notice by CMI (or such shorter period for Reef's decision as is required to prevent loss of opportunity), CMI and Reef shall jointly proceed as set forth in this Agreement. WITH RESPECT TO ANY EVALUATIONS TO BE CONDUCTED BY EITHER PARTY HEREUNDER, EITHER INDIVIDUALLY REEF PARTNERS LLC October 31, 2001 OR JOINTLY, INCLUDING AN INITIAL PROSPECT REVIEW OR A FURTHER REVIEW UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH 4, EACH PARTY HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ANY SUCH REVIEW, AND THE METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED THEREIN, ARE NECESSARILY SUBJECTIVE. ACCORDINGLY, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 4.B. BELOW, NEITHER PARTY MAKES ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY (WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE) AS TO THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR SUFFICIENCY OF ANY SUCH EVALUATION, AND EACH PARTY DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY FOR ACCURACY OF ANY PROSPECT EVALUATION CONDUCTED BY THE OTHER PARTY DURING THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND WARRANTS THAT IT IS INDEPENDENTLY QUALIFIED TO MAKE A DECISION WHETHER TO INVEST IN ANY PARTICULAR PROSPECT REGARDLESS OF WHETHER IT PARTICIPATES IN OR CONDUCTS A REVIEW EVALUATION.

Related to Opportunity Evaluation

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Profitability The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by XXXX under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to XXXX, and pre-tax profits realized by XXXX, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed XXXX’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by XXXX in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the DWS Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by XXXX and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available. Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.