Population and Housing Sample Clauses

Population and Housing. Guide for use

Population and Housing. The Project is expected to have less than significant to no impacts on Population and Housing. The Project is expected to have less than significant impacts on Public Services.

Population and Housing. A.1.9.1 CONTRACTOR shall review best available data to determine the estimated number of existing people or housing that may be displaced as a result of the allowed increase of commercial vacation rentals within the County. A.1.9.2 CONTRACTOR shall prepare a qualitative analysis for this section if no available data is found.

Population and Housing. As discussed above, one of the key terms of the 2017 settlement agreement between the City of Menlo Park and the City of East Palo Alto is that an HNA will be prepared when the preparation of an EIR is required. Therefore, population and housing topics will be discussed in the EIR, rather than in the Initial Study (see Task 6, below).  Public Services and Utilities – As stated above, the Project would intensify uses at the site compared to existing conditions and would introduce new onsite employees as well as additional demand for services and utilities. ICF will estimate the Project-generated demand for public services and utilities based on existing operational standards. Although new utility connections would be required for the intensification of the uses at the Project site, these connections are not anticipated to result in significant impacts. Compared to the analysis in the certified ConnectMenlo EIR, the Project is not expected to trigger the need for new or expanded public service facilities or utilities. This scope of work anticipates that the land use assumptions in the Water Supply Evaluation (WSE) Study prepared for ConnectMenlo were conservative. In addition, the Initial Study will discuss and evaluate the existing water flow issue for fire pressure in the area.

Population and Housing. Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than significant Impact No Impact Would the project:

Population and Housing. The EIR will evaluate whether the Specific Plan would result in a substantial increase in population and employment (beyond the General Plan growth projections) and whether the project could displace residences.

Population and Housing. Would the project:

Population and Housing. 1. The Project will not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and thus there is no impact.

Population and Housing. As discussed above, one of the key terms of the 2017 settlement agreement between the City of Menlo Park and the City of East Palo Alto is that an HNA will be prepared when the preparation of an EIR is required. Therefore, population and housing topics will be discussed in the EIR, rather than in the Initial Study (see Task 6, below).

Population and Housing. Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 2001-2009, with 2000 Benchmark. Sacramento, California. May. RDD/110670009 (CLR4681.DOCX) 7-1 WBG030811023650RDD Flow and Loading Detail for Development Projects with Approved Wastewater Capacity Specific Plan or General Plan Common Name Residential Industrial Office Retail Total ADWF (gpd) Residential Specific Plan 13 13,728 31 36 10 11,400 12 14 5 5,700 17 19 30,828 60 69 Industrial Specific Plan – North 30 31,680 72 84 31,680 72 84 Industrial Specific Plan – South (Low Density) 584 154,176 347 405 136 143,616 326 381 29 33,060 35 41 330,852 708 826 I-205 Specific Plan 95 100,320 228 266 64 72,960 211 243 173,280 439 509 Plan "C" Residential Planning Area (Low Density) 113 29,832 67 78 10 11,400 33 38 41,232 100 116 Northeast Industrial – Phase 1 92 97,152 221 258 97,152 221 258 Northeast Industrial – Phase 2 29 30,624 70 81 30,624 70 81 Northeast Industrial – Phase 3 347 366,432 833 972 366,432 833 000 Xxxxx XxxXxxxxx (Low Density) 122 32,208 72 85 32,208 72 85 Downtown Specific Plan (Low Density) 120 31,680 71 83 3 3,420 4 4 3 3,420 10 11 38,520 85 99 Downtown Specific Plan (High Density) 1,167 205,392 462 539 205,392 462 539 In-fill Properties (Low Density) 1,207 318,648 717 836 75 79,200 180 210 11 12,540 13 15 48 54,000 000 000 465,108 1,069 1,244 Xxxxx Project (Low Density) 505 133,320 300 350 133,320 300 350 Xxxxx Project (Medium Density) 1705 368,280 829 967 368,280 829 967 Xxxxx Project (High Density) 40 7,040 16 18 7,040 16 18 Xxxxx Project – Village Commercial 26 30,199 87 101 30,199 87 101 Xxxxx Project – Swim Center 17 19,536 57 65 19,536 57 65 Gateway – Phase 1 85 96,900 102 119 55 62,700 182 209 159,600 284 328 Standard Pacific 69 18,216 41 48 18,216 41 48 RDD\111080005 (CLR2469.xlsx) WBG030811023650RDD 1 of 1 Flow and Loading Detail for Future Service Areas (Residential) Specific Plan or General Plan Common Name Very Low Density (1.5 DU per acre) Low Density (4.35 DU per acre) Medium Density (9 DU per acre) High Density (18.75 DU per acre) Westside Residential (URs 5, 7, 8, 9) UR5 (Bright) UR7 (Bright) UR8 (Xxxxx) UR 9 (Xxxxxx) UR1 (Xxxxxxx + others) UR11 (South Linne) Tracy Hills 570 83 380 82 150,480 21,912 339 49 395 58 174 174 96 305 1,305 1,591 296 250 40 40 22 70 300 539 68 47 45,936 45,936 25,265 80,388 344,520 420,024 78,091 66,000 103 103 57 181 775 945 176 149 121 121 66 211 904 1,103 205 173 360 432 252 387 585 3,286 40 48 28 43 65 557 77,760 93,312 54,432 83,592 126,360 709,776 175...