Progression Rates Sample Clauses

Progression Rates a.) Progression rates of pay for all operators hired on or after July 1, 2011 shall be: First twenty-four (24) months following completion of training - 70% of top rate Next eighteen (18) months following completion of training - 80% of top rate Next six (6) months following completion of training - 95% of top rate Thereafter - 100% of top rate b.) Effective 7/1/11 of this contract, the above progression rates set forth in Section 3.a shall apply to current operators and to their service, however it shall not apply retroactively. Pay of individuals in the current progression schedule on 7/1/11 will revert to the new progression pay status on the beginning day of the first pay period post 7/1/11. c.) Streetcar operators shall be paid fifteen cents (.15) per hour above his/her progression rate.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Progression Rates a.) Progression rates of pay for the above classifications hired on or after July 1, 2011 shall be: First twenty-four (24) months following completion of training - 70% of top rate Next eighteen (18) months following completion of training - 80% of top rate Next six (6) months following completion of training - 95% of top rate Thereafter - 100% of top rate b.) Effective 7/1/11 of this contract, the above progression rates set forth in Section 2a. shall apply to the above classifications and to their service, however it shall not apply retroactively. Pay of individuals in the current progression schedule on 7/1/11 will revert to the new progression pay status on the beginning day of the first pay period post 7/1/11.
Sample 1
Progression Rates a.) Progression rates of pay for all Transit Information Operators hired on or after July 1, 2011 shall be: First twenty-four (24) months following completion of training - 70% of top rate Next eighteen (18) months following completion of training - 80% of top rate Next six (6) months following completion of training - 95% of top rate Thereafter - 100% of top rate b.) Effective 7/1/11 of this contract, the above progression rates set forth in Section 2a. shall apply to current Transit Information Operators and to their service, however it shall not apply retroactively. Pay of individuals in the current progression schedule on 7/1/11 will revert to the new progression pay status on the beginning day of the first pay period post 7/1/11.
Sample 1
Progression Rates. It is understood and agreed between the parties that the following progression rates apply to full-time new hires: Between UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1518 (Hereinafter referred to as “The Employer”) And UNITED STEELWORKERS (On behalf of LOCAL UNION 2952, O & T Unit) (Hereinafter referred to as “The Union”)
Sample 1
Progression Rates. Progression rates (i.e. an internal measure of those eligible to progress or to graduate in any one year) for Scots domiciled full-time undergraduate students over the last 5 years are: We remain committed to the maintenance of those excellent progression and retention rates, which we view as evidence of the excellence of our learning environment and to the quality and level of support available to all of our students, and we will maintain an overall progression and retention rate of at least 95% for 2018/19 and beyond. Our aim in respect of progression and retention of students from SIMD 20/40 data zones will be same as for the general population i.e.95%. For all categories of protected characteristics our aim will be progression and retention of at least 90%. That figure is lower than the overall progression and retention rate not because we have lower expectations in respect of students from these groups, but because of the distorting effect that very small numbers have on %age values e.g. a single ‘21 and over student’ failing to be retained in 2020/21 yields a retention rate of 92%. · Achieve an overall progression and retention rate of at least 95%. Since entering the NSS in 2012/13, our satisfaction rates have shown minor fluctuation, although we are pleased to note that overall satisfaction has increased over the past 2 years, albeit on a reduced response rate in the most recent survey due to a Student Union led boycott of the survey in support of an NUS led boycott. Notwithstanding any boycott, Conservatoire management continues to attach significant importance to the NSS, and to monitor action plans annually in order to address specific issues identified through our analysis of the full NSS dataset. Informed by NSS results (and other data), one of the priorities of the current review process (all undergraduate programme are being reviewed in 2017/18) is to enhance the effectiveness of assessment and feedback, and a number of innovations have been incorporated into programmes to that end. The Conservatoire’s provision is unique in Scotland – we are the nation’s only provider of conservatoire level education in and for the performing arts. We are also the only conservatoire in the UK to offer programmes across the entire spectrum of the performing arts - dance, drama, music, production and film – augmented in 2015/16, with SFC support, by a BA Performance in British Sign Language and English and postgraduate programmes in learning and teaching in t...
Sample 1

Related to Progression Rates

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer provides refrigerated warehousing and logistic distribution services to clients throughout the United States. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to invest in a new refrigeration and distribution facility in the XxXxxxxxx Park area of Sacramento, California, and hire full-time employees (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit A (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of full-time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the salaries of any of the full-time employees hired within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the salary of any full-time employee that is not employed by Taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, the salary of any full-time employee hired to fill a vacated position in which a full-time employee was employed during Taxpayer’s Base Year shall be disregarded.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Performance Adjustment Rate Except as otherwise provided in sub-paragraph (e) of this paragraph 3, the Performance Adjustment Rate is 0.02% for each percentage point (the performance of the Portfolio and the Index each being calculated to the nearest .01%) that the Portfolio's investment performance for the performance period was better or worse than the record of the Index as then constituted. The maximum performance adjustment rate is 0.20%. For purposes of calculating the performance adjustment of the portfolio, the portfolio's investment performance will be based on the performance of the retail class. The performance period will commence with the first day of the first full month following the retail class's commencement of operations. During the first eleven months of the performance period for the retail class, there will be no performance adjustment. Starting with the twelfth month of the performance period, the performance adjustment will take effect. Following the twelfth month a new month will be added to the performance period until the performance period equals 36 months. Thereafter the performance period will consist of the current month plus the previous 35 months. The Portfolio's investment performance will be measured by comparing (i) the opening net asset value of one share of the retail class of the Portfolio on the first business day of the performance period with (ii) the closing net asset value of one share of the retail class of the Portfolio as of the last business day of such period. In computing the investment performance of the retail class of the Portfolio and the investment record of the Index, distributions of realized capital gains, the value of capital gains taxes per share paid or payable on undistributed realized long-term capital gains accumulated to the end of such period and dividends paid out of investment income on the part of the Portfolio, and all cash distributions of the securities included in the Index, will be treated as reinvested in accordance with Rule 205-1 or any other applicable rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as the same from time to time may be amended.

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Performance Adjustment One-twelfth of the annual Performance Adjustment Rate will be applied to the average of the net assets of the Portfolio (computed in the manner set forth in the Fund's Declaration of Trust or other organizational document) determined as of the close of business on each business day throughout the month and the performance period.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!