Project Assessment. (a) The Grant Recipient shall undertake a summative assessment of the Project.
(b) The summative assessment shall be undertaken according to the Secretary of State’s common framework and methodology which the Secretary of State shall provide to the Grant Recipient.
(c) The summative assessment must be completed and supplied to the Secretary of State at least three months before the final Grant Claim is submitted in accordance with clause 5.4.
(d) For the avoidance of doubt, the Secretary of State will not make a payment in respect of the final Grant Claim until a satisfactory summative assessment report produced in conformity with the Secretary of State’s common framework and methodology has been received.
(e) Subject to clause 5.1(c), the maximum amount of Grant payable to the Grant Recipient in respect of the summative assessment is as specified in the Project Specific Conditions and shall not exceed 1% of the Project Specific Eligible Expenditure or £100,000, whichever is the lower.
Project Assessment. 12.1. The Participant shall cooperate with the City in the conduct of any evaluation of the Deep Retrofit Challenge, the Deep Retrofit Project, and/or the Agreement that the City may carry out during the Term of the Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the above, if reasonably requested by the City to do so for the purpose of conducting an evaluation or creating a case study, the Participant agrees to participate in any appropriate periodic site visits of the Building, surveys, interviews, case studies, or other data collection exercises initiated by the City.
Project Assessment. During the Development Period, the parties will perform a project assessment, in such manner and at such times as the Parties mutually agree upon in writing, to determine the mix of Xxxxxx.xxx Technology and Third Party technology to be incorporated into the Company Site.
Project Assessment. Applicant represents and commits that the personal property investment, once completed, will have a yearly minimum gross assessment of no less than the values listed on Exhibit A. (“Minimum Assessed Value”).
Project Assessment. Applicant represents and commits that the real property improvements, once completed, will have a minimum gross assessment of no less than $__________ excluding the assessed valuation on the preexisting real property (“Minimum Assessed Value”).
Project Assessment e.g. technical and financial evaluation of application forms based on the procedures and checklists prepared by the Managing Authority
Project Assessment. PROJECT ASSESSMENT MEETINGS The designated project managers of MELCO and GEOWORKS will meet to determine and assess the status of the project and set goals for the next fiscal quarter on the following dates:
1) The purpose of these meetings is to reach mutual agreement on the status of the V291TD Project and for MELCO to raise any issues relating to Geoworks' performance. Unless Geoworks receives written notice of dissatisfaction from MELCO, the project will be presumed on course and the performance of Geoworks accepted and fully satisfactory for all time through the meeting date. If MELCO is not fully satisfied, within five (5) calendar days following the Interim Project Assessment Meeting, MELCO will provide a notice of dissatisfaction and a definitive list of status issues requiring attention and correction by Geoworks, including proposed time deadlines. Geoworks will respond in writing within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the notice from MELCO and identify how it will take the corrective action requested or required by MELCO. In the event all issues are not resolved within 14 calendar days following the Interim Project Assessment Meeting, the Parties will meet in person for the purpose of resolving all issues to completion ("Resolution Meeting"). In the event the Parties do not resolve all issues at the Resolution Meeting, any portion of the retention relating to open and un-resolved issues will be held in deposit. During these meetings, Professional Service Fees will be reviewed and are subject to alteration in the event of changes to the specification in section 6.1 of this Exhibit.
Project Assessment. Proposals must be submitted to the Industry, Tourism and Investment (ITI) Regional Office. All applications will be reviewed in detail by ITI, prior to presentation to the relevant APF sub-committee. Incomplete proposals will be returned to the applicant for further information. Any delay in receiving complete proposals may result in missing that month’s deadline, and thereby delay the proposal review process.
Project Assessment. Determining the appropriate approach in working and communicating with stakeholders is not scientific practice. There is no single formula for determining the most effective engagement strategy. Project Staff shall be aware of requirements for community engagement based on funding sources or other project characteristics and shall complete the following upon project determination:
1. A Community Engagement (CE) Assessment as part of a collaborative discussion with MPRB staff that has stake and interest in a project to select the level of community engagement for a project (Inform, Consult, Involve or Partner, as defined in the CE Assessment in Policy Definitions). The initial level of community engagement for the project may be adjusted or improved as the project progresses.
Project Assessment. A. The RECIPIENT agrees to submit a brief survey regarding the key project results or water quality project outcomes and the status of eventual environmental results or goals from the project. The DEPARTMENT’s Performance Measures Lead will e-mail the RECIPIENT the Post Project Assessment Survey approximately sixty (60) days prior to the Post Project Assessment Date. This date will generally be three (3) to five (5) years after the agreement expires. An example of the Post Project Assessment Survey is included as Attachment 1. This form is to be completed by the RECIPIENT and sent as an e-mail attachment to the DEPARTMENT’s Project Manager and the DEPARTMENT’s Water Quality Program Performance Measures Lead. The DEPARTMENT may conduct on-site interviews and inspections, and may otherwise evaluate the Project. The DEPARTMENT will enter the information provided into its performance measures database to be provided to the Washington State Legislature, United States Environmental Protection Agency, and other natural resource agencies. The Performance Measures Lead will be available as needed during negotiations, throughout the project, and in the post project assessment period as a resource. The Post Project Assessment Survey is 3 to 5 years after the expiration date. Post Project Assessment Date: March 15, 2014.
B. Water Quality Goal(s): (Water Quality Goals are tangible environmental changes for the better, to be achieved or directly addressed by the proposed project.)
1. The project will contribute toward designated uses of the Illahee Creek and Port Orchard Bay being restored or protected, 303(d)-listed water bodies restored to water quality standards, or healthy waters kept from being degraded.
C. Water Quality Project Outcomes: (Water Quality Project Outcomes are quantitative results realistically anticipated from the project that will directly lead to the Water Quality Goals.)
