Program Performance Measures Sample Clauses

Program Performance Measures. Grantee performance shall be determined using the following measures: 1. Total formal referrals in each year of the grant period; 2. Average daily population of juveniles under deferred prosecution and probation supervision in each year of the grant period; 3. Number of placements in secure and non-secure residential post-adjudication facilities in each year of the grant period; 4. Percentage of juveniles under deferred prosecution and probation supervision participating in a community- based program in each year of the grant period; 5. Number of juveniles committed to the Department in each year of the grant period; 6. Number of juveniles certified as adults in each year of the grant period; 7. Percentage of Department-eligible offenders committed to the Department; 8. One, two, and three year re-referral/re-arrest and incarceration recidivism rates for juveniles beginning supervision, beginning a program, and leaving a post-adjudication residential facility; 9. Total number of juveniles provided mental health services during the contract period; 10. Total number of mental health assessments or psychological evaluations completed; 11. Total number of mental health treatment hours provided; 12. Number of juveniles offenders served by State Aid Grant Commitment Diversion funding; 13. Percent of juveniles served completing Commitment Diversion programs or placements; 14. Number of juveniles served by State Aid Grant Commitment Diversion funding committed to TJJD by the juvenile probation department during the grant period; 15. One, two, and three year recidivism rates for all juveniles served by State Aid Grant Commitment Diversion funding in programs and post-adjudication placements.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (53)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Program Performance Measures. 1. Contractor shall administer the same district and state-required assessments in the same manner and timeframe and follow, at a minimum, the same promotion and graduation requirements as all MPS schools, as described in the MPS Administrative Policy 7.37, Graduation Requirements, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Appendix D, or as approved in writing by the Director of Contracted School Services. Contractor explicitly agrees to comply with the assessment and accountability provisions of P.L. 114-95, Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) as they are made applicable to MPS and Contractor. 2. In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph I.C.1. above, Contractor may choose to define and implement up to two local performance goals as well as up to two local assessments to measure student achievement and gauge progress against locally established goals. Performance goals and assessments must be pre-approved by CSS prior to the execution of this Contract. Contractor may report all such data regarding local performance measures in its annual pupil academic achievement report. Contractor’s decision to implement unique standards and assessment shall not affect Contractor’s obligation to comply with the standards adopted by the State of Wisconsin and federal, state and district assessment and accountability measures. 3. All pupils attending the Educational Program under this Contract shall be included in the assessment process, with reasonable accommodations for pupils being made if necessary. Contractor shall include children with disabilities and English Language Learners (ELL) in all federal, state, district, and local educational assessments, with appropriate modifications where necessary, or alternative assessments for those children who cannot participate in federal, statewide, district-wide or local educational agency-wide assessments. 4. The Board shall pay all costs associated with district-required assessments administered to pupils attending the Educational Program under this Contract. Contractor shall participate in the Wisconsin Alternate Accountability process designed by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction if the school does not meet criteria for state level school report cards. 5. Listed below are 10 performance criteria. Some of the performance criteria may not apply to Contractor because of the grade levels of the pupils served at the Educational Program. Contractor shall develop and submit an annual ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (35)
Program Performance Measures. Grantee performance shall be determined using the following measures for each fiscal year of the grant period: 1. number of formal referrals; 2. average daily population of juveniles under deferred prosecution and probation supervision; 3. number of placements in secure and non-secure post-adjudication facilities; 4. percentage of juveniles under deferred prosecution and probation supervision participating in a community-based program; 5. number of juveniles committed to TJJD; 6. number of juveniles certified as adults; 7. percentage of TJJD-eligible juveniles committed to TJJD; 8. one-, two-, and three-year re-referral/re-arrest and incarceration recidivism rates for juveniles beginning supervision, beginning a program, and leaving a post-adjudication residential facility;
Sample 1Sample 2
Program Performance Measures. Performance criteria shall be used to assess the level of performance of the Contractor and considered by County when determining future funding. In order to be considered in compliance with the performance criteria, the Contractor must submit to Health Care Agency a request for reimbursement which demonstrates that Contractor has expended funds and met their proposed accomplishment goals at the required levels, unless exempted in writing by the Director. Failure to achieve performance may cause any remaining balance in this Contract to be reclaimed by County and will negatively affect future funding to Contractor. The table below summarizes the performance criteria the Contract will be measured against. The County will also monitor performance using the available HMIS reports pertaining to the Program. For the life of the Contract, Contractor shall meet or exceed the following performance metrics: 30 Number of year-round enrollment beds 5 Number of year-round night by night beds 12,775 Total number of bed nights to be made available 120 Total of unduplicated number of persons to be served in enrollment shelter 100 Total of unduplicated number of persons to be served in night-by-night shelter 10% % of enrollment participants will move into transitional housing at project exit 30% % of enrollment participants will move into permanent housing at project exit 15% % of enrollment adult participants will obtain earned income at project exit 15% % of enrollment adult participants will obtain cash/non-cash benefits at project exit 80% % of enrollment participants who move into transitional housing or permanent housing will remain housed for 3 months 17 Total unduplicated number of households to be served 90% % of participants will move into permanent housing at project exit 42% % of adult participants will obtain earned income at project exit 30% % of adult participants will obtain cash/non-cash benefits at project exit 80% % of participants will remain in permanent housing for 6 months
Sample 1
Program Performance Measures. Grantee performance shall be determined using the following measures for each fiscal year of the grant period: a. number of formal referrals; b. average daily population of juveniles under deferred prosecution and probation supervision; c. number of placements in post-adjudication residential placement facilities; d. percentage of juveniles under deferred prosecution and probation supervision participating in a community- based program; e. number of juveniles committed to TJJD; f. number of juveniles certified as adults; g. percentage of TJJD-eligible juveniles committed to TJJD; h. one-, two-, and three-year re-referral/re-arrest and incarceration recidivism rates for juveniles beginning supervision, beginning a program, and leaving a post-adjudication residential placement facility; i. number of juveniles provided mental health services; j. number of mental health assessments or psychological evaluations completed; k. number of mental health treatment hours provided; l. number of juveniles served by State Aid Grant Commitment Diversion funding; m. percent of juveniles served completing Commitment Diversion programs or placements; n. number of juveniles served by State Aid Grant Commitment Diversion funding committed to TJJD; and o. one-, two-, and three-year recidivism rates for all juveniles served by State Aid Grant Commitment Diversion funding in programs and post-adjudication residential placement facilities.
Sample 1
Program Performance Measures. (a) CONTRACTOR will track, at a minimum, the performance measures identified below and detailed in program instructions prepared by COUNTY and incorporated into this Contract by reference. CONTRACTOR will document and report this data to COUNTY as described in Section C .3. “Reporting Requirements”. CONTRACTOR agrees to participate with the COUNTY in evaluation of contracted project/service outcomes or performance, and to make available all information required by such evaluation process. This includes providing COUNTY with data necessary to verify client counts, service provision, and outcome measures.
Sample 1
Program Performance Measures. Performance criteria shall be used to assess the level of performance of Contractor and considered by County when determining future funding. In order to be considered in compliance with the performance criteria, Contractor must submit to County a request for reimbursement which demonstrates that Contractor has expended funds and met their proposed accomplishment goals at the required levels, unless exempted in writing by the Director. Failure to achieve performance may cause any remaining balance in this Contract to be reclaimed by County and may negatively affect future funding to Contractor. The table below itemizes the performance criteria the Contract will be measured against. County also may monitor performance using the available HMIS reports pertaining to the Program. For the life of the Contract, Contractor shall meet or exceed the following performance metrics: 134 Minimum number of unduplicated persons experiencing homelessness served 38 Minimum number of unduplicated households experiencing homelessness served 134 Of those served, minimum number of unduplicated persons experiencing unsheltered homelessness 38 Of those served, minimum number of unduplicated households experiencing unsheltered homelessness 120 Average length of stay (in days) for participants in Program 10% Minimum % of participants will increase earned income at Program exit 15% Minimum % of participants will increase cash/non-cash benefits at Program exit 40% Minimum % of participants will exit the Program to permanent housing 40% Minimum of % of households will exit the Program to permanent housing 100% Of those who exit to permanent housing, % of participants who remain in permanent housing for three (3) months 80% Of those who exit to permanent housing, minimum % of participants that return County of Orange, Health Care Agency Contract MA-042-20010823 to homelessness within six (6) months of Program exit
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Program Performance Measures 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)

Related to Program Performance Measures

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit G), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Performance Metrics The “Performance Metrics” for the Performance Period are: (i) the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities; (ii) the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (Major Events Excluded) (“XXXXX”); (iii) Arizona Public Service Company’s customer to employee improvement ratio; (iv) the OSHA rate (All Incident Injury Rate); (v) nuclear capacity factor; and (vi) coal capacity factor. (1) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (i) of this Subsection 6(a), the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey will provide data on an annual basis reflecting the Company’s percentile ranking, relative to other participating companies. (2) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (ii) of this Subsection 6(a), the Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”) will provide data on an annual basis regarding the XXXXX result of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its XXXXX result for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (3) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iii) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL, an independent third party data system, will provide data on an annual basis regarding the customer and employee counts; the Company will use its customer and employee counts for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those companies whose customers and employees were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (4) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (iv) of this Subsection 6(a), EEI will provide data on an annual basis regarding the OSHA rate of the participating companies; the Company will calculate its OSHA rate for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by EEI. (5) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (v) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the nuclear capacity factors of the participating nuclear plants; the Company will calculate its nuclear capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (6) With respect to the Performance Metric described in clause (vi) of this Subsection 6(a), SNL will provide data on an annual basis regarding the coal capacity factors of the participating coal plants; the Company will calculate its coal capacity factor for the year in question and determine its percentile ranking based on the information provided by SNL. Only those plants that were included in the data provided by SNL in each of the years of the Performance Period will be considered. (7) The Company’s percentile ranking during the Performance Period for each Performance Metric will be the average of the Company’s percentile ranking for each Performance Metric during each of the three years of the Performance Period (each, an “Average Performance Metric”); provided, however, that if the third year of a Performance Metric is not calculable by December 15 of the following year, the Performance Metric shall consist of the three most recent years for which such Performance Metric is calculable. The Company’s “Average Performance,” for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b) above will be the average of the Average Performance Metrics. If only quartile, rather than percentile, rankings are available for a particular Performance Metric, the Average Performance Metric for any such Performance Metric shall be expressed as a percentile. For example, if the Performance Metric was in the top quartile for two Performance Periods and in the lowest quartile in the other Performance Period, the average of these quartiles would be 3 (the average of 4, 4, and 1) and the Average Performance Metric would be the 75th percentile (3 /4). The calculations in this Subsection 6(a)(7) will be verified by the Company’s internal auditors. (8) If either EEI or SNL discontinues providing the data specified above, the Committee shall select a data source that, in the Committee’s judgment, will provide data most comparable to the data provided by EEI or SNL, as the case may be. If the JD Power Residential National Large Segment Survey for investor-owned utilities (or a successor JD Power survey) is not available during each of the years of the Performance Period, the Performance Metric associated with the JD Power Residential Survey (Subsection 6(a)(1)) will be disregarded and not included in the Company’s Average Performance for purposes of determining any Base Grant adjustments pursuant to Subsection 5(b).

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 6.6. (b) If the Operator does not comply with the Operator Performance Level then the Operator must pay to Aurizon Network the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 as part of the invoice issued by Aurizon Network for charges for the Billing Period immediately following Aurizon Network becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, the Operator must pay such amount to Aurizon Network within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from Aurizon Network. (c) If Aurizon Network does not comply with the Aurizon Network Performance Level then Aurizon Network will credit to the Operator the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 by way of a deduction from the invoice issued by Aurizon Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following the Operator becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, Aurizon Network must pay such amount to the Operator within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from the Operator. (d) The Parties must, if requested by either Party, meet to review the Performance Levels subject to such review not occurring within six (6) Months after the Commitment Date or any previous review of the Performance Levels. If either Party notifies the other that it considers that the Performance Levels are no longer appropriate, the Parties may, but only with the written consent of the relevant End User, agree on varied Performance Levels and any associated variations to the Agreement including [the Base Access Charges and]

  • KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out- 4.1.1 the performance objectives and targets that must be met by the Employee; and 4.1.2 the time frames within which those performance objectives and targets must be met. 4.2 The performance objectives and targets reflected in Annexure A are set by the Employer in consultation with the Employee and based on the Integrated Development Plan, Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) and the Budget of the Employer, and shall include key objectives; key performance indicators; target dates and weightings. 4.2.1 The key objectives describe the main tasks that need to be done. 4.2.2 The key performance indicators provide the details of the evidence that must be provided to show that a key objective has been achieved. 4.2.3 The target dates describe the timeframe in which the work must be achieved. 4.2.4 The weightings show the relative importance of the key objectives to each other. 4.3 The Employee’s performance will, in addition, be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan.

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!