Quality Assessment. Assess the quality of the Offeror’s past performance on those recent efforts that were determined relevant by determining how well the contractor performed on the contracts. Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.
Quality Assessment. Formatted: Right: 0.63 cm The information gathered from the final selection of studies was assessed for methodological quality and risk of bias. It should be recognized that no ‘gold standard’ tool for the quality assessment of studies currently exists (Xxxxxx et al, 2004). The present review solely included quantitative research studies; therefore the ‘Checklist for assessing the quality of quantitative studies’ (Xxxx, Xxx & Xxxx, 2004) was applied. Higher scores represented a stronger methodological quality. A second rater independently evaluated seven (20%) of the total number of studies using the quality criteria to check for agreement. The checklist and rating procedure were discussed before ratings were made to ensure consistency in interpretation of the checklist items. Inter-rater reliability for the quality scores of these seven papers was calculated in SPSS (version 24) using Intra-Class Correlation and was found to be .97, which is considered excellent. Remaining disagreements were resolved through discussions to determine a final rating.
Quality Assessment a) The Contractor or Contractor Representative will establish a minimum of one (1) quality examination plot per hectare planted and be well distributed throughout the block, so as to capture an arrangement of plots that are somewhat equidistant in spacing .Plots must be easily seen from a distance, with a ribbon hung at least 1.3m from the ground, and a ribbon driven into the ground to indicate plot centre. Plot location must fall within 10m of where they are indicated on the map. Plot size shall be 50 m² (radius = 3.99m). At each plot the following shall be recorded on an FS 704 or similar form:
Quality Assessment. The Company shall implement a quality assessment and management system which meets the requirements of Prudent Utility Practice and any other applicable standards to ensure that the delivery of Services satisfies all Service Quality Requirements.
Quality Assessment. 5.1 Quality assessment and internal monitoring A statement specifying the measures to be taken to assess the quality of the Authority’s service including any relevant monitoring arrangements developed by the Authority to assess performance against the Standard. This should include any agreed inter-authority audit or peer review arrangements. The Authority will also wish to include details of any externally accredited or self assessment models used.
Quality Assessment. If we engage in quality assessment, we shall do so through a panel of not less than three physicians selected by us from among a list of physicians contracting with us.
Quality Assessment. If United engages in quality assessment, United shall do, so through a panel of not less than three physicians selected by United from among a list of physicians contracting with United.
Quality Assessment. The contractor will establish robust means to ensure the reliability, validity, and comparability of the information collected as well of its analysis and of its reporting. The Steering Group will have to agree on a quality assessment of the final report. For details on minimal requirements regarding quality assessment of the deliverables, please see Xxxxx XXX. In order to ensure the necessary quality for such work, contractors should be constantly minded that: - the evaluation shall respond to the information needs, in particular as expressed in the terms of reference and following discussions with the steering group; - the methodology and design shall be adequate for proceeding to the evaluation tasks and for obtaining the results needed to answer the evaluation questions; - collected data must be adequate for their intended use and their reliability must be ascertained; - data shall be analysed systematically to answer the evaluation questions and to cover all the information needs in a valid manner; - findings shall follow logically from and be justified by the data/information analysis and by interpretations based on pre-established and rational criteria; - conclusions for being valid shall be non-biased and fully based on findings.
Quality Assessment. The PROVIDER agrees to cooperate and comply with the Quality Assessment Program, if any, as may be maintained by RIPCPC from time to time. The PROVIDER acknowledges that failure to cooperate with RIPCPC's Quality Assessment Program may result in termination of this Agreement.
Quality Assessment. 5.1 • To carry out internal monitoring to verify conformance with legal obligations, Codes of Practice and internal procedures. • Internal monitoring. • To track the outcomes of zero rated inspections, with the aim of improving the star ratings. • Internal monitoring. • To participate in Inter authority auditing as required. • No performance measure
