Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data Sample Clauses

Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data. (A7) The Study will supplement existing data as necessary to assess risk to human health and ecological receptors and to define chemical constituent migration pathways. The objectives of the Study are determined using the seven-step process defined in USEPA’s Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process (EPA QA/G 4, August 2000) and USEPA Region 5 Guidance. The DQOs will reflect the use of analytical methods for identifying and addressing contamination consistent with the levels for potential remedial action identified in the National Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR Part 300 (NCP), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (XXXX), and guidance as provided in the Settlement Agreements.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data. The following sections provide a description of the development of DQOs and guidance on data quality ind icators for measurement data. RWQCB site investigations are tiered and potentially include evaluation of all environmental media. The two types of data that may be collected include :  Screening level data, which m ay be used for information on nature and ext ent of contamination, preliminary investigations, and site characterization.  Definitive level data, which m ay be used for all purposes , including site closure and risk assessment.
Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data. Quality Assurance is a management function. It deals with setting policy and running an administrative system of management controls that cover planning, implementation, and review of data collection activities. Quality control is technical in nature and is implemented at the project level. It includes all the scientific precautions, such as calibration and duplication, that are needed to acquire data of known and adequate quality. This project will include a synoptic survey and detailed field and laboratory studies to be determined following completion of Tasks 1 through 4. The data quality objectives for the field sampling programs are: • To obtain valid data that meet requested reporting limits for total, dissolved, and methylmercury in water and total and methylmercury in sediment at all sampling locations. • To obtain valid data that meet requested reporting limits for listed ancillary parameters in water and sediment at all sampling locations. The data quality objectives for the laboratory experiments will be included in the specific plans for those experiments. In general, the purpose will be to obtain necessary data to conclusively test proposed hypotheses. The chemical concentration data from field surveys and laboratory experiments will be evaluated based on accuracy, precision, representativeness, comparability, and completeness, as discussed in Section 3.4 of this QAPP. Other information from the field surveys will be reviewed for representativeness, comparability, and completeness.

Related to Quality Objectives and Criteria for Measurement Data

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Program Objectives In performing its responsibilities with respect to the management and administration of the Program, each party shall be guided by the following Program objectives:

  • Service Objectives D4.1 The Services will:

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Specific Objectives In accordance with Articles 34 and 35 of the Cotonou Agreement, the specific objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.