Risk Management Review Sample Clauses

Risk Management Review. The Investment Committee is also the Risk Management Committee that generally meets on a quarterly basis (more frequently if deemed necessary) and its responsibilities include oversight of investment management, operational policies and procedures, and an overall review of advisory operations.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Risk Management Review. In consultation with Bunge, REG will conduct a thorough review of REG’s current and historical procurement, sales and risk management procedures so as to provide Bunge with the basis to develop a Risk Management Plan and Risk Management Policy. Risk Management Policy: Bunge will use the information from the Risk Management Review to help develop a Risk Management Policy. The Risk Management Policy will include recommendations regarding position limits in both strategic and hedging accounts, position structures attributable to both strategic and hedging accounts, trading authorities and lines of responsibility and internal controls. The Board of Directors of REG and/or the applicable Party Affiliate shall approve the Risk Management Policy as required in order to implement such policy for each Facility. Risk Management Plan and Strategy Recommendations: Bunge will provide regular day to day advice regarding risk management strategies for REG to consider. In addition Bunge will from time to time forward specific, detailed and written risk management recommendations for REG to consider. Bunge will keep a log of all recommendations, including entrance and exit strategies. On at least on a quarterly basis, Bunge will share this log as prepared by Bunge with REG. Bunge will also on an annual basis provide a broader risk management plan focused on the longer term fundamental outlook for the basis, flat price and spread relationships for REG’s relevant markets for Feedstock and Biodiesel. This Risk Management Plan will not necessarily include specific written risk management recommendations. At Bunge’s sole discretion, Strategy Recommendations and the Risk Management Plan may be accompanied by confidential Bunge supply and demand research related to world grain, oilseed. energy and biofuel markets. Best Practices Sharing. REG may from make requests that Bunge share best practices with respect to various aspects of REG’s business. Bunge shall review these best practices requests and may or may not provide information to REG as Bunge determines in its sole and absolute discretion.
Risk Management Review. PJM shall also conduct a periodic compliance verification process to review and verify, as applicable, Participants’ risk management policies, practices, and procedures pertaining to the Participant’s activities in any PJM Markets. PJM shall review such documentation to verify that it appears generally to conform to prudent risk management practices for entities trading in any PJM Markets. Participant shall also provide a high level summary by the chief risk officer or other Principal regarding any material violations, breaches, or compliance or disciplinary actions in connection with such risk management policies, practices and procedures within the prior twelve (12) months. If a third-party industry association publishes or modifies principles or best practices relating to risk management in North American markets for electricity, natural gas or electricity-related commodity products, PJM may, following stakeholder discussion and with no less than six (6) months prior notice to stakeholders, consider such principles or best practices in evaluating the Participant’s risk controls. PJM will prioritize the verification of risk management policies based on a number of criteria, including but not limited to how long the entity has been in business, the Participant’s and its Principals’ history of participation in any PJM Markets, and any other information obtained in determining the risk profile of the Participant. Each Participant’s continued eligibility to participate in any PJM Markets is conditioned upon PJM notifying the Participant of successful completion of PJM’s verification of the Participant’s risk management policies, practices and procedures, as discussed herein. However, if PJM notifies the Participant in writing that it could not successfully complete the verification process, PJM shall allow such Participant fourteen (14) calendar days to provide sufficient evidence for verification prior to declaring the Participant as ineligible to continue to participate in any PJM Markets, which declaration shall be in writing with an explanation of why PJM could not complete the verification. If the Participant does not provide sufficient evidence for verification to PJM within the required cure period, such Participant will be considered in default under this Tariff. PJM may retain outside expertise to perform the review and verification function described in this paragraph. PJM and any third party it may retain will treat as confidential the documentati...

Related to Risk Management Review

  • Risk Management Except as required by applicable law or regulation, (i) implement or adopt any material change in its interest rate and other risk management policies, procedures or practices; (ii) fail to follow its existing policies or practices with respect to managing its exposure to interest rate and other risk; or (iii) fail to use commercially reasonable means to avoid any material increase in its aggregate exposure to interest rate risk.

  • Risk Management Policy The Administrative Agent and the Lenders shall have received a copy of the Risk Management Policy, including position and other limits, which shall be satisfactory in content and form to the Administrative Agent.

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.