Severity Classification and Response Time Goals Sample Clauses

Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are classified according to severity of impact on the use of the Software, according to the Support Response Time Goal chart below. All disputes regarding severity classification will be resolved by TCP in its sole discretion. Severity Impact Response Time Goal Level 1 Production system is down, impacting all applications and associated business systems. No Workaround exists. A Level 1 Issue will immediately be assigned to a TCP Support Technician who will contact Client within one (1) business hour with an initial response. The support technician will then work without interruption on the Issue until a resolution is reached, either in the form of a complete fix, or an interim Workaround solution that will cause the level of urgency to drop to Level 2. Level 2 Production system performance is degraded, but operational; Issue affects essential functions and no Workaround exists; or Issue is blocking critical systems tests or deliverables. A Level 2 Issue will immediately be assigned to a TCP Support Technician who will contact Client within two (2) business hours with an initial response. The support technician will then work without interruption during standard support hours until a resolution is reached, either in the form of a complete fix, or an interim Workaround solution that will cause the level of urgency to drop to Level 3. Level 3 General product questions relating to development, feature issues, or Documentation. A Level 3 Issue will be assigned to a TCP Support Technician who will contact Client within one (1) business day with an initial response. The support technician will work on the issue during Standard Support Hours.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are classified according to severity of impact on the use of the Software, according to the Support Response Time Goal chart below. All disputes regarding severity classification will be resolved by TCP in its sole discretion.
Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are classified according to severity of impact on the use of the Application, according to the chart below. All disputes regarding severity classification will be resolved by Service Provider in its sole discretion.
Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are classified according to severity of impact on the use of the Application, according to the chart below. All disputes regarding severity classification will be resolved by Service Provider in its sole discretion. Severity Impact Response Time Goal 1 Production system is down impacting all applications and associated business systems. 4 hours (via the Customer Support Portal) 2 Production system performance is degraded, but operational; Issue affects essential functions; or Issue is blocking critical systems tests or deliverables. 1 business day 3 General product questions relating to development, feature issues, or documentation. 2 business days
Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are classified by Supplier according to severity of impact on the use of the Application, according to the
Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are classified by Service Provider according to severity of impact on the use of the Application, according to the chart below. All disputes regarding severity classification will be resolved by Service Provider in its sole discretion. Basic/Standard Support Response Time Goals Severity Impact Response Time Goal 1 Production system is down, impacting all applications and associated business systems. 4 business hours (via the Customer Support Portal) 2 Production system performance is degraded, but operational; Issue affects essential functions; or Issue is blocking critical systems tests or deliverables. 1 business day 3 General product questions relating to development, feature issues, or documentation. 2 business days
Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are classified according to the severity of impact on the use of the Software, according to the Support Response Time Goal chart below. TCP will resolve all disputes regarding severity classification at its sole discretion. Level 1 Production system is down, impacting all applications and associated business systems. No Workaround exists. A Level 1 Issue will immediately be assigned to a TCP Support Technician who will contact Client within one (1) business hour with an initial response. The support technician will then work without interruption on the Issue until a resolution is reached, either in the form of a complete fix, or an interim Workaround solution that will cause the level of urgency to drop to Level 2.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Severity Classification and Response Time Goals. Issues are

Related to Severity Classification and Response Time Goals

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing PNG traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to PNG, the subtending arrangements between PNG Tandem Switches and PNG End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that PNG maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Client Classification 7.1. We shall not have an obligation to treat our clients in different classes depending on their knowledge and expertise.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Contract Goals A. For purposes of this procurement, OGS conducted a comprehensive search and determined that the Contract does not offer sufficient opportunities to set goals for participation by MWBEs as subcontractors, service providers, or suppliers to Contractor. Contractor is, however, encouraged to make every good faith effort to promote and assist the participation of MWBEs on this Contract for the provision of services and materials. The directory of New York State Certified MWBEs can be viewed at: xxxxx://xx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/FrontEnd/VendorSearchPublic.asp?TN=ny&XID=2528. Additionally, following Contract execution, Contractor is encouraged to contact the Division of Minority and Women’s Business Development ((000) 000-0000; (000) 000-0000; or (000) 000-0000) to discuss additional methods of maximizing participation by MWBEs on the Contract. B. Good Faith Efforts Pursuant to 5 NYCRR § 142.8, evidence of good faith efforts shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. A list of the general circulation, trade, and MWBE-oriented publications and dates of publications in which the Contractor solicited the participation of certified MWBEs as subcontractors/suppliers, copies of such solicitations, and any responses thereto. 2. A list of the certified MWBEs appearing in the Empire State Development (“ESD”) MWBE directory that were solicited for this Contract. Provide proof of dates or copies of the solicitations and copies of the responses made by the certified MWBEs. Describe specific reasons that responding certified MWBEs were not selected. 3. Descriptions of the Contract documents/plans/specifications made available to certified MWBEs by the Contractor when soliciting their participation and steps taken to structure the scope of work for the purpose of subcontracting with, or obtaining supplies from, certified MWBEs. 4. A description of the negotiations between the Contractor and certified MWBEs for the purposes of complying with the MWBE goals of this Contract. 5. Dates of any pre-bid, pre-award, or other meetings attended by Contractor, if any, scheduled by OGS with certified MWBEs whom OGS determined were capable of fulfilling the MWBE goals set in the Contract. 6. Other information deemed relevant to the request.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Safety Objectives 55.1 The Parties recognise the potentially hazardous nature of the construction industry. To this end, the Parties to the Agreement are committed to continuous improvement in occupational health and safety standards through the implementation of an organisational framework which involves all Parties in protecting Employees’ health and safety. 55.2 In meeting these objectives, the Parties have agreed to consider a broad agenda through the consultative processes established by this Agreement. Such an agenda will include: (a) Measures designed to include the safe operation of plant and equipment; (b) Training issues including specific hazards, health and safety systems, and site induction; (c) Management of occupational health and safety through a comprehensive approach which aims to control hazards at their source, reduce the incidence and costs of occupational injuries and illnesses; and (d) Risk of fatigue (see clause 36.5). 55.3 The Employer will comply with all relevant work health and safety legislation, including the OHS Act, workers compensation legislation, regulations, codes of practice and relevant and appropriate Australian and Industry Standards as set out in Appendix F.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 6.6. (b) If the Operator does not comply with the Operator Performance Level then the Operator must pay to Aurizon Network the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 as part of the invoice issued by Aurizon Network for charges for the Billing Period immediately following Aurizon Network becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, the Operator must pay such amount to Aurizon Network within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from Aurizon Network. (c) If Aurizon Network does not comply with the Aurizon Network Performance Level then Aurizon Network will credit to the Operator the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 by way of a deduction from the invoice issued by Aurizon Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following the Operator becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, Aurizon Network must pay such amount to the Operator within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from the Operator. (d) The Parties must, if requested by either Party, meet to review the Performance Levels subject to such review not occurring within six (6) Months after the Commitment Date or any previous review of the Performance Levels. If either Party notifies the other that it considers that the Performance Levels are no longer appropriate, the Parties may, but only with the written consent of the relevant End User, agree on varied Performance Levels and any associated variations to the Agreement including [the Base Access Charges and]

  • New Job Classifications When a new classification (which is covered by the terms of this collective agreement) is established by the Hospital, the Hospital shall determine the rate of pay for such new classification and notify the local Union of the same. If the local Union challenges the rate, it shall have the right to request a meeting with the Hospital to endeavour to negotiate a mutually satisfactory rate. Such request will be made within ten (10) days after the receipt of notice from the Hospital of such new occupational classification and rate. Any change mutually agreed to resulting from such meeting shall be retroactive to the date that notice of the new rate was given by the Hospital. If the parties are unable to agree, the dispute concerning the new rate may be submitted to arbitration as provided in the agreement within fifteen (15) days of such meeting. The decision of the arbitrator (or board of arbitration as the case may be) shall be based on the relationship established by comparison with the rates for other classifications in the bargaining unit having regard to the requirements of such classification. When the Hospital makes a substantial change in the job content of an existing classification which in reality causes such classification to become a new classification, the Hospital agrees to meet with the Union if requested to permit the Union to make representation with respect to the appropriate rate of pay. If the matter is not resolved following the meeting with the Union, the matter may be referred to arbitration as provided in the agreement within fifteen (15) days of such meeting. The decision of the arbitrator (or board of arbitration as the case may be) shall be based on the relationship established by comparison with the rates for other classifications in the bargaining unit having regard to the requirements of such classifications. The parties further agree that any change mutually agreed to or awarded as a result of arbitration shall be retroactive only to the date that the Union raised the issue with the Hospital. The parties further agree that the above process as provided herein shall constitute the process for Pay Equity Maintenance as required by the Pay Equity Act.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!