Survey Methodology. The County will survey at market average. Salary data will be compiled at the top step of the applicable benchmark.
Survey Methodology. All steps in each salary range shall be increased by the same percentage. The salary for intermediate classifications in ranges between the Entry and Supervisory levels shall be based on prorating or interpolating the salaries.
Survey Methodology. The survey shall be accomplished using the methods and procedures required by the RFP, or when specifically requested, using the following publications: A Guide for Analyzing And Reporting Energy Use and Characteristics Of Commercial Building, ASHRAE; Technical Assistance Report, Guidelines and Evaluation Criteria, California Energy Commission; Federal Register, 10 CFR Parts 450-455; and Architect's and Engineer's Guide to Energy Conservation in Existing Buildings, Volume 2, Energy Conservation Opportunities, U.S. Department of Energy (Attachment J.1). Sample Tables and Forms can be found in the first two publications.
Survey Methodology. In preparation for 2019 negotiations, the City shall conduct a salary survey subject to the following:
Survey Methodology. Table 24 summarizes the characteristics of the 2008, 2009, and 2010 survey samples. In all three surveys, passengers were surveyed on-board the express buses between downtown Miami and northern Dade and Broward Counties. There have been some methodology changes from year to year, primarily in the number of days the survey was collected, and the direction in which they were conducted. Survey Day/Period Direction Surveys Passenger Response Collected Counts Rate (%) 5/27; 6–9 am S/B 266 1318* 20.2 2008 Pre- 5/28; 6–9 am S/B 213 1483* 14.4 Deployment 5/29; 4–6 pm N/B 93 387** 24.0 TOTAL 572 3188 17.9 2009 Post 5/13; 3-6 PM N/B 277 414 66.9 Phase 1A 5/14; 3-6 PM N/B 72 110 65.5 5/11; 6-9 AM S/B 281 393 71.5 5/11; 3-6 PM S/B 207 317 65.3 5/12; 6-9 AM S/B 320 N/B 591 54.1 5/12; 3-6 PM S/B 182 N/B 364 50.0 5/13; 6-9 AM S/B 105 118 89.0 2010 Post Phase 1B Deployment N/B N/B 5/13; 3-6 PM S/B N/B 75 112 67.0 * Passenger counts are for all 95 Express runs within the specified Day/Period/Direction ** MDT staff expressed concern that the passenger count on 5/29 appeared low and could be in error. In 2008, buses were sampled over three days and in both directions. In 2009, buses were sampled over two days but only in the northbound direction, hence the smaller sample size when compared to 2008. In 2010, surveys were conducted in both the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. Most were collected in the peak direction (a.m. is southbound; p.m. is northbound). However, a small number of surveys were conducted in the non-peak direction as well. Hence both “S/B” and “N/B” are annotated in Table 24 for the 2010 survey. Passenger counts were collected on the individual buses for the 2009 and 2010 surveys, while in 2008, passenger counts were collected for all 95X runs during that day/period/direction. This led to a significant difference in calculated response rates. Finally, the 2010 survey included the new Broward County routes as well as the original Route 95X. The Sheridan Street and Broward Boulevard routes were identified collectively in the survey as the Dade-Broward Express. The Pines/Hollywood Express was identified as such, and the original Route 95X was identified as the Route 95 Express. Expansion factors (typically used to correct for variation in levels of non-response on individual bus runs) were not applied to any dataset when comparing 2008 and 2009 due to the difference in passenger count collection. Sensitivity testing was done on the 2009 dataset, where individual run...
Survey Methodology. The methodology for administering the survey will involve a travel diary format. ETC Institute will design and implement a process for recruiting participants, administering the survey, and retrieving the survey data. ETC Institute will also be responsible for developing the actual survey instruments that will be used to record each participant's household data and trip data. Partially completed household travel surveys will be replaced.
Survey Methodology. 12.1 If it is determined by the HSP that a Heritage Survey is required, then the methodology to be adopted and the report delivered will be in accordance with this clause.
12.2 The Grantee will discuss the Heritage Survey methodology with the Heritage Service Provider, with a view to determining which methodology is fit-for- purpose, having regard to the Native Title Party’s concerns for the area in and about the Affected Area, the Current Work Program and any other relevant factors raised by either Party.
12.3 If it is determined by the HSP that a Heritage Survey is required, then the Heritage Service Provider has sixty (60) days from receipt of the Heritage Notice to organise and ensure the appropriate Heritage Survey is undertaken.
12.4 Subject to clause 12.5, the Native Title Party is not obliged or required to provide culturally sensitive information to the Grantee.
12.5 The information provided by the Native Title Party and recorded in the Final Survey Report will be determined as follows:
(a) Where the Grantee provides details in its Heritage Notice only of a particular Exploration Activity to be undertaken pursuant to its Current Work Program, the Final Survey Report will clearly indicate (using maps and co-ordinates) that part of the Exploration Activity that is Cleared or Not Cleared. Should the proposed activities materially change then a new Heritage Notice must be issued and new Heritage Survey be undertaken if required by the HSP, unless the Parties otherwise agree.
(b) Where the Grantee provides details in its Heritage Notice of a range of possible Exploration Activities in an area (including activities outside its Current Work Program), the Final Survey Report will clearly indicate (including by using plans, maps and co-ordinates) any parts of that area to be avoided because they contain or may contain Aboriginal Objects and/or Aboriginal Sites.
(c) Where any of the following applies:
(i) a Heritage Survey that the Native Title Party accepts as valid has been conducted and a Final Survey Report completed pursuant to 12.5(a) or 12.5(b) above; or
(ii) an Ethnographic Survey in relation to the relevant area which the Native Title Party accepts as valid has been completed; or
(iii) an Archaeological Survey in relation to the relevant area which the Native Title Party accepts as valid has been completed; and
(iv) the Grantee provides details in its Heritage Notice of possible future developments (outside what is permitted by the Tenement, such a...
Survey Methodology. If after the consultation about the Heritage Notice set out in clause 8 above it is determined by the Parties that a Heritage Survey is required, the methodology to be adopted and the report delivered will be in accordance with this clause. S ubject to clause 9.3 but otherwise despite anything else in this Agreement, the Claimant Group is not obliged to provide culturally sensitive information. The information provided by the Claimant Group and recorded a Survey Report will be determined as follows: Where the Proponent provides details in its Heritage Notice only of a particular Exploration Activity to be undertaken pursuant to its Current Work Program, the Survey Report will clearly indicate (using maps and co-ordinates) that part of the Exploration Activity that is cleared or not cleared. Should the proposed activities change then a new Heritage Notice will need to be issued.
Survey Methodology. 1. For comparison purposes "salaries" will include salary (not including longevity steps) and employee contributions to PERS ("EPMC") for the Police Officer classification.
2. The seven (7) survey cities are: Alameda Berkeley Daly City Hayward Oakland Richmond San Leandro
3. The use of the above seven (7) cities shall be for the purpose of salary comparisons only. The survey shall be performed on October 1st, of the appropriate year and will include all known wage increases effective the first full pay period of July of that year (e.g., the 2010 survey shall include any scheduled increases effective the first full pay period of July, 2010 and known as of October 1, 2010). Any changes will be retroactive to July 1 of the applicable year.
A. Effective October 1, 2013, wages for members of the bargaining unit shall be reduced by 5%.
Survey Methodology. 3.1.4.1 Survey will be conducted in English and Spanish.
3.1.4.2 Survey shall be comprised of a combination of on line and telephone surveys to reach the target response rates.
