The Results Sample Clauses

The Results. The [Institution]OR[Collaborator] will own the results of the Project (the Results). Ownership of the results of the Project (the Results) will be split between the Institution and the Collaborator as follows: the Institution: [insert details]; and the Collaborator: [insert details].
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Results. (a) The report containing the results of the Index will be delivered in the first instance via email in pdf format (the “Report”). (b) The Report will be delivered in prior to the Index Virtual Awards tentatively scheduled for early June 2022. (c) All Subscribers who are ranked in bronze, silver or gold will be announced at Mind’s Index awards event and subsequently published on Mind’s website. (d) All results and rankings as produced by Mind are final. Mind cannot guarantee that the Subscriber will receive any particular ranking or award. (e) Mind retains the right to publicise the results of the Index and related ranking or benchmarking information.
Sample 1
The Results. Upon completing a successful Offering (“Closing”), you will promptly receive full payment of the Cash within 3 business days of escrow closing, for the percentage of the item(s) you offered on Collectable. Closing is defined as: all the trades and investments are fully settled and secured in Collectable’s escrow account. This typically takes 10 days from IPO completing funding. If you elected to retain any Equity in the Asset, it will be issued to you by Collectable. If you retain any Equity in the Asset (i.e. Retained Equity), you will continue to possess/hold the asset after Closing. In the unlikely event the Offering is unsuccessful, you can choose to: (1) buy up the balance of stock through Collectable’s platform and accept the amount raised through the Offering at the close of the Period (2) relist the asset with Collectable under amended acquisition terms, or (3) retain full title to your Asset.
Sample 1
The Results. The license in respect of the Results shall permit use of the Results in applications for regulatory clearance and such licenses (generally) shall be to make, use, sell and otherwise dispose of products failing within the scope of the claims of any of the applications or patents for the LICENSEE Inventions, or which utilize the Results, and shall include full Sub-licensing rights and shall continue, in the case of the LICENSEE Inventions until *********************** ***************************************************, and in the case of the Results until *********************************************** (other than through the LICENSEE's default). The license in respect of the Results shall include the physical transfer of the Results (or copies) by the LICENSEE to LKS, at LKS's expense.
Sample 1
The Results. Table 9.12 presents us with a summary of the results obtained for this study. It should be noted that in this table, ubiquity (expressed in %) comprises approximate (“cf.”) as well as secure identifications and that it refers to the occurrence of the identified taxa between the sample spectra. The abundance of species combines both approximate and secure identifications. We will now comment briefly on each artefact. CPP-1 (F 96, stone vessel) This artefact only provided three starch grains. Two hereof, however, were identified as maize derived starches whereas the third could not be identified. They all had marks of damage caused due to pressure, probably grinding, at various degrees. Fortunately, the two maize starches retained sufficient morphometrical characteristics in order to ascribe them to a certain species. The third starch grain could not be ascribed to any taxa due to heavy damage. CPP-2 67 101 ceramic fragment CPP-3 77 117 ceramic fragment CPP-4 230 199 ceramic fragment CPP-5 L18.01 milling stone CPP-6 011.03 milling stone CPP-7 M10.5 milling stone CPP-8 256 151.2 griddle fragment CPP-9 257 199 griddle fragment CPP-10 254 200 griddle fragment
Sample 1
The Results. The license in respect of the Results shall permit use of the Results in applications for regulatory clearance and such licenses (generally) shall be to make, use, sell and otherwise dispose of products failing within the scope of the claims of any of the applications or patents for the LICENSEE Inventions, or which utilize the Results, and shall include full Sub-licensing rights and shall continue, in the case of the LICENSEE Inventions until all of the applications and patents relating thereto have ceased to subsist, and in the case of the Results until all the same have fallen into the public domain (other than through the LICENSEE's default). The license in respect of the Results shall include the physical transfer of the Results (or copies) by the LICENSEE to LKS, at LKS's expense.
Sample 1
The Results. To begin with we note that if the random part of the dynamics (1) is omitted the land possession becomes fractalized. As a mathematical result about iterative maps with Bernoulli variables it was demonstrated not so long ago – see, for instance, [19]. The essence of the effect, however, was a fact well known to our ancestors and it was behind various juridical acts attempting to prevent a land structure disintegration. One can mention the so-called birthright edict – a part of the legal reform of the Habsburg Emperor Xxxxxx XX dated 1787 – which did not allow to split the land below 40 “measures”, which is roughly 7.6 ha or 19 acres. This law was valid until the year 1869 when the rural land market – representing the random part of the dynamics (1) – became vivid enough and the edict became obsolete. The imperial act allowing the free divisibility and exchangeability of land (in Moravia, from which our data are taken, it was valid already one year earlier, in 1868) caused an unprecedented increase of the land exchange. For example, according to [20] in average 10% of estates changed the proprietary relations yearly during the period 1869–87. What we find in the present cadastral data is thus a result of a process that started in 1868, some five generations ago. At the beginning it was marked by an boosted land exchange and the dynamics became steady only about a generation later. While these fact are documented, one may speculate about other factors having impact of the dynamics, in particular, changes in the population structure. It is obvious that that the natality and the number of offsprings living up to the adulthood were considerably higher at the beginning of the process, and as a result, the distribution of the land co-ownership was different from the present data. Unfortunately, the digitalized Czech land registry does not contain such a history record – all we see is a snapshot of the recent situation. In the light of these comments indicating how simplified our model dynamics (1)) is, it is surprising and worth of attention how well do its result agree with the observed acreage probability distribution. One more comment is needed before the results can be presented. We are dealing with all the plots contained in digitalized cadastral map with the exception of the build up areas. The reason for this methodical choice is simple: build up areas are places where building stand. In the cadastral map, however, we see only the ground plane, i.e. the pr...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Results. The Service Web 3.0 results include:
Sample 1

Related to The Results

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Results The five values obtained shall be arranged in order and the median value taken as the result of the measurement. This value shall be expressed in Newtons per centimetre of width of the tape.

  • Narrative Results ‌‌ i. For the first Quarterly Claims Review Report only, a description of (a) Xxxxxxxx Clinic’s billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing, and (b) a description of controls in place to ensure that all items and services billed to Medicare or a state Medicaid program by Xxxxxxxx Clinic are medically necessary and appropriately documented. Subsequent Quarterly Claims Review Reports should describe any significant changes to items (a) and (b) or, if no significant changes were made, state that the systems and controls remain the same as described in the prior Quarterly Claims Review Report. ii. A narrative explanation of the results of the Quarterly Claims Sample, including reasons for errors, patterns noted, etc.

  • Publication of Results The National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20112) requires NASA to provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof. As such, NASA may publish unclassified and non-Proprietary Data resulting from work performed under this Agreement. The Parties will coordinate publication of results allowing a reasonable time to review and comment.

  • ADVERTISING RESULTS The prior written approval of the Commissioner is required in order for results of the Bid to be used by the Contractor as part of any commercial advertising. The Contractor shall also obtain the prior written approval of the Commissioner relative to the Bid or Contract for press or other media releases.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Notification of Results Within 10 days after satisfactory inspection and/or testing of Interconnection Facilities built by the Interconnection Customer (including, if applicable, inspection and/or testing after correction of defects or failures), the Interconnected Transmission Owner shall confirm in writing to the Interconnection Customer and Transmission Provider that the successfully inspected and tested facilities are acceptable for energization.

  • Ownership of Results Any interest of Contractor or its subcontractors, in the Deliverables, including any drawings, plans, specifications, blueprints, studies, reports, memoranda, computation sheets, computer files and media or other documents prepared by Contractor or its subcontractors for the purposes of this Agreement, shall become the property of and will be transmitted to City. However, unless expressly prohibited elsewhere in this Agreement, Contractor may retain and use copies for reference and as documentation of its experience and capabilities.

  • Fundamental Analysis The equity investment analysts provide independent research and analysis of specific companies within a sector. Typically, analysis includes review of published reports, interviews of company management, on-site observation of company operations, and the use of various financial models. In addition, analysts read trade journals, attend industry conferences, and focus on trends within the sector and industry. Based on this proprietary analysis, the analyst makes buy, sell or hold recommendations to the Adviser.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!