The Results Sample Clauses

The Results. (a) The report containing the results of the Index will be delivered in the first instance via email in pdf format (the “Report”).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Results. 5.1 The [Institution]OR[Collaborator] will own the results of the Project (the Results). OR Ownership of the results of the Project (the Results) will be split between the Institution and the Collaborator as follows: the Institution: [insert details]; and the Collaborator: [insert details].
Sample 1Sample 2
The Results. Table 9.12 presents us with a summary of the results obtained for this study. It should be noted that in this table, ubiquity (expressed in %) comprises approximate (“cf.”) as well as secure identifications and that it refers to the occurrence of the identified taxa between the sample spectra. The abundance of species combines both approximate and secure identifications. We will now comment briefly on each artefact. CPP-1 (F 96, stone vessel) This artefact only provided three starch grains. Two hereof, however, were identified as maize derived starches whereas the third could not be identified. They all had marks of damage caused due to pressure, probably grinding, at various degrees. Fortunately, the two maize starches retained sufficient morphometrical characteristics in order to ascribe them to a certain species. The third starch grain could not be ascribed to any taxa due to heavy damage. No. EC Feature Square Object CPP-2 67 101 ceramic fragment CPP-3 77 117 ceramic fragment CPP-4 230 199 ceramic fragment CPP-5 L18.01 milling stone CPP-6 011.03 milling stone CPP-7 M10.5 milling stone CPP-8 256 151.2 griddle fragment CPP-9 257 199 griddle fragment CPP-10 254 200 griddle fragment
Sample 1
The Results. The Service Web 3.0 results include:
Sample 1
The Results. The license in respect of the Results shall permit use of the Results in applications for regulatory clearance and such licenses (generally) shall be to make, use, sell and otherwise dispose of products failing within the scope of the claims of any of the applications or patents for the LICENSEE Inventions, or which utilize the Results, and shall include full Sub-licensing rights and shall continue, in the case of the LICENSEE Inventions until *********************** ***************************************************, and in the case of the Results until *********************************************** (other than through the LICENSEE's default). The license in respect of the Results shall include the physical transfer of the Results (or copies) by the LICENSEE to LKS, at LKS's expense.
Sample 1
The Results. The license in respect of the Results shall permit use of the Results in applications for regulatory clearance and such licenses (generally) shall be to make, use, sell and otherwise dispose of products failing within the scope of the claims of any of the applications or patents for the LICENSEE Inventions, or which utilize the Results, and shall include full Sub-licensing rights and shall continue, in the case of the LICENSEE Inventions until all of the applications and patents relating thereto have ceased to subsist, and in the case of the Results until all the same have fallen into the public domain (other than through the LICENSEE's default). The license in respect of the Results shall include the physical transfer of the Results (or copies) by the LICENSEE to LKS, at LKS's expense.
Sample 1
The Results. To begin with we note that if the random part of the dynamics (1) is omitted the land possession becomes fractalized. As a mathematical result about iterative maps with Bernoulli variables it was demonstrated not so long ago – see, for instance, [19]. The essence of the effect, however, was a fact well known to our ancestors and it was behind various juridical acts attempting to prevent a land structure disintegration. One can mention the so-called birthright edict – a part of the legal reform of the Habsburg Emperor Xxxxxx XX dated 1787 – which did not allow to split the land below 40 “measures”, which is roughly 7.6 ha or 19 acres. This law was valid until the year 1869 when the rural land market – representing the random part of the dynamics (1) – became vivid enough and the edict became obsolete. The imperial act allowing the free divisibility and exchangeability of land (in Moravia, from which our data are taken, it was valid already one year earlier, in 1868) caused an unprecedented increase of the land exchange. For example, according to [20] in average 10% of estates changed the proprietary relations yearly during the period 1869–87. What we find in the present cadastral data is thus a result of a process that started in 1868, some five generations ago. At the beginning it was marked by an boosted land exchange and the dynamics became steady only about a generation later. While these fact are documented, one may speculate about other factors having impact of the dynamics, in particular, changes in the population structure. It is obvious that that the natality and the number of offsprings living up to the adulthood were considerably higher at the beginning of the process, and as a result, the distribution of the land co-ownership was different from the present data. Unfortunately, the digitalized Czech land registry does not contain such a history record – all we see is a snapshot of the recent situation. In the light of these comments indicating how simplified our model dynamics (1)) is, it is surprising and worth of attention how well do its result agree with the observed acreage probability distribution. One more comment is needed before the results can be presented. We are dealing with all the plots contained in digitalized cadastral map with the exception of the build up areas. The reason for this methodical choice is simple: build up areas are places where building stand. In the cadastral map, however, we see only the ground plane, i.e. the pr...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Results. Upon completing a successful Offering (“Closing”), you will promptly receive full payment of the Cash within 3 business days of escrow closing, for the percentage of the item(s) you offered on Collectable. Closing is defined as: all the trades and investments are fully settled and secured in Collectable’s escrow account. This typically takes 10 days from IPO completing funding. If you elected to retain any Equity in the Asset, it will be issued to you by Collectable. If you retain any Equity in the Asset (i.e. Retained Equity), you will continue to possess/hold the asset after Closing. In the unlikely event the Offering is unsuccessful, you can choose to: (1) buy up the balance of stock through Collectable’s platform and accept the amount raised through the Offering at the close of the Period (2) relist the asset with Collectable under amended acquisition terms, or (3) retain full title to your Asset.
Sample 1

Related to The Results

  • Results The five values obtained shall be arranged in order and the median value taken as a result of the measurement. This value shall be expressed in Newtons per centimeter of width of the tape. Annex 7 Minimum requirements for sampling by an inspector

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • SEC Reports; Disclosure Materials The Company has filed all reports, schedules, forms, statements and other documents required to be filed by it under the Exchange Act, including pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) thereof, for the two years preceding the date hereof (or such shorter period as the Company was required by law or regulation to file such material) (the foregoing materials, including the exhibits thereto and documents incorporated by reference therein, being collectively referred to herein as the “SEC Reports”, and the SEC Reports, together with the Disclosure Schedules, being collectively referred to as the “Disclosure Materials”) on a timely basis or has received a valid extension of such time of filing and has filed any such SEC Reports prior to the expiration of any such extension, except where the failure to file on a timely basis would not have or reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect (including, for this purpose only, any failure to qualify to register the Conversion Shares for resale on Form S-3 or which would prevent any Purchaser from using Rule 144 to resell any Securities). As of their respective filing dates, or to the extent corrected by a subsequent restatement, the SEC Reports complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder, and none of the SEC Reports, when filed, contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The Company has never been an issuer subject to Rule 144(i) under the Securities Act. Each of the Material Contracts to which the Company or any Subsidiary is a party or to which the property or assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries are subject has been filed as an exhibit to the SEC Reports.

  • Adjustments Resulting in Underpayments In the case of any adjustment pursuant to a Final Determination with respect to any such Tax Return, the Responsible Company shall pay to the applicable Tax Authority when due any additional Tax due with respect to such Return required to be paid as a result of such adjustment pursuant to a Final Determination. The Responsible Company shall compute the amount attributable to the KLX Group (or the B/E Group) in accordance with Section 2 and KLX shall pay to B/E any amount due B/E (or B/E shall pay KLX any amount due KLX) within 30 days from the later of (i) the date the additional Tax was paid by the Responsible Company or (ii) the date of receipt of a written notice and demand from the Responsible Company for payment of the amount due, accompanied by evidence of payment and a statement detailing the Taxes paid and describing in reasonable detail the particulars relating thereto. Any payments required under this Section 5.2(c) shall include interest computed at the Prime Rate based on the number of days from the date the additional Tax was paid by the Responsible Company to the date of the payment under this Section 5.2(c).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!