Tenured Faculty Evaluation Sample Clauses

Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The evaluation process will be conducted with all professors who are tenured or in a non-tenure track. After a professor is no longer in a probationary status, they will move into the professor evaluation cycle starting with the first year subsequent to being awarded tenure. If a professor is not in a tenure track, the evaluation cycle will begin with the first year of full-time employment. Full-time Tenured Professors who choose to teach additional courses as an overload assignment will have the assignment included as part of the tenure appraisal process. Evaluations are based on multiple indices and include administrative, student, peer, and self-evaluations. In keeping with the mission of the College, the goal of the evaluation process is to improve the abilities and skills of professors through immediate feedback, support and recommendation. To achieve this goal the evaluation process will do the following: maintain a positive learning environment for students; insure professors remain competent/knowledgeable in their fields; retain faculty through intervention, assistance and guidance; acknowledge effective forms of instructional delivery; and provide immediate feedback to professors.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. A. Two-Step Process 1. Student Evaluation a. Student evaluations will be arranged through the appropriate Vice President’s office, and be obtained in each class, or for those faculty who engage in instruction outside of the traditional classroom, in the equivalent of a class, per year during the time covered by this evaluation period. b. These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty member to review. c. The student evaluations are the property of the faculty member, and will be returned to the faculty member at the end of the semester, and the information contained therein will not be retained by the college or the district, used by the administration in the completion of the formal evaluation, or included in the faculty member’s personnel file.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. A. Tenured Faculty Evaluation Process 1. Self-evaluation a. The faculty member will submit to the Xxxx a portfolio including a report of college, District or committee service; accomplishments (such as publications, shows or performances) awards and achievements; appropriate class materials such as sample syllabi and assignments; and other pertinent documents. 2. Instructional activity observation a. The appropriate Xxxx, or designee will make scheduled classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below: i. The faculty member and Xxxx or designee will mutually agree on the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled evaluation(s) will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under optimum conditions displaying his/her abilities. ii. Each evaluation shall include at least one (1) observation, lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. For on-line classes, the faculty member will present the course to the evaluator during an observation lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. 3. Student Evaluation a. Student evaluations will be arranged through the appropriate Xxxx’x office, and be conducted in each class during the fall and spring semesters, or for those faculty members who engage in instruction outside of the traditional classroom, in the equivalent of a class, during the academic year in which the evaluation is conducted. b. These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty member to review. c. The student evaluations are the property of the faculty member, and will be returned to the faculty member at the end of the semester, and the information contained therein will not be retained by the college or the district, used by the administration in the completion of the formal evaluation, or included in the faculty member’s personnel file. 4. Report preparation a. The Xxxx will complete a Faculty Performance Evaluation report, including a recommendation of continued employment, based upon: i. the materials from the faculty portfolio; ii. results of observations; iii. items relevant to the instructional duties assigned to the faculty member, including adherence to Board Policy and college processes and deadlines; iv. a review of activities which are outside of the instructi...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching and learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations. a. Tenured Faculty Evaluation Process (1) Self-Evaluation The faculty member will submit to the xxxx a portfolio including a report of college, District or committee service; accomplishments (such as publications, shows or performances); awards and achievements; 2768 appropriate class materials such as sample syllabi and assignments; and 2769 other pertinent documents. 2770 (2) Instructional Activity Observation 2772 2773 The appropriate xxxx, or designee will make scheduled 2774 classroom/worksite/electronic visits as described below: 2775 (a) The faculty member and xxxx or designee will mutually agree on 2777 the course(s) or equivalent in which the scheduled observation(s) 2778 will take place, so that the faculty member may be observed under 2779 optimum conditions displaying their abilities. 2780 2781 (b) Each evaluation shall include at least one (1) observation, lasting at 2782 least fifty (50) minutes. For on-line classes, the faculty member 2783 will present the course to the evaluator during an observation 2784 lasting at least fifty (50) minutes. 2785 (3) Student Evaluations 2787 2788 (a) Student evaluations will be conducted in all classes during the 2789 semester in which a formal evaluation is performed. 2790 2791 Student evaluations are to be initiated prior to November 1 for the 2792 fall semester and prior to April 1 for the spring semester for full 2793 term and 1st 8-week classes and by December 1 and May 1 for late 2794 start and 2nd 8-week classes. 2795 2796 (b) For those faculty members who engage in instruction outside of the 2797 classroom, including librarians, counselors, and learning disability 2798 specialists, student evaluations will be collected within five (5) 2799 days of student contact sessions (i.e., student appointments or 2800 reference desk visits) during a selected month during the semester 2801 in which a formal evaluation is performed. 2802 2803 (c) These student evaluations will be made available for the faculty 2804 member and one tenured faculty member serving as a peer 2805 reviewer from the department or division/school, or from a related 2806 department or division/school selected by the evaluate, following 2807 the due dates for grades. The select...
Sample 1
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. Tenured Faculty Evaluation A. Post-Tenure Reflection Process 1. Post-Tenure Reflection Process Schedule
Sample 1Sample 2
Tenured Faculty Evaluation. The tenured faculty evaluation process is designed to improve the teaching/ learning process and delivery of student services, to provide a basis for professional growth and development, and to comply with California State Community College laws and regulations.
Sample 1

Related to Tenured Faculty Evaluation

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. The administration will be evaluating the teacher’s performance within the time of formal responsibility. The evaluation process and form will be shared with the Association Building Representatives at the beginning of each school year. (a) Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least two (2) times a year. The first evaluation will be completed prior to December 1st and the second prior to April 15th. Each evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations, on the performance of other duties and responsibilities and the goals developed in the Individualized Development Plan (IDP). The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at anytime prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the probationary teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. (b) Tenured teachers will be evaluated on a rotating schedule, but no less than once every three- (3) years. The administration reserves the right to evaluate a tenured teacher more often. The evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations and on the performance of other duties and responsibilities. The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at any time prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the tenured teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. 2. The administrator shall prepare and submit a written evaluation and recommendations to the teacher prior to May 30th of the year they are evaluated. The administrator shall hold a conference with the teacher to discuss the written evaluation and recommendations. 3. Upon receipt of the evaluation the teacher will sign the form indicating his/her receipt of the report. The signature on the form does not constitute his/her approval unless specifically noted. 4. Teachers involved with the instruction of Advanced Placement courses will be evaluated. This evaluation in the first year will be made part of the formal evaluation only at the request of the teacher. B. A teacher who disagrees with the content or procedure of evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation in question and/or submit any complaints through Level 4 of the grievance procedure. C. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons shall be set forth in specific terms. Included will be examples of specific ways in which the teacher is to improve and assistance may be given by the administrator and other staff members. In subsequent conferences it shall be the responsibility of the individual teacher to inquire whether adequate improvement has taken place. D. Monitoring and observation of the work performance of the teacher shall be conducted openly. The public address or audio system or similar types of communications will not be used for the purpose of evaluation. E. The Board and the Association recognize that the ability of pupils to progress and mature academically is a combined result of the school, home, economic and social environment and that teachers alone cannot be held accountable for all aspects of the academic achievement of the pupil in the classroom. Test results of academic progress of students shall not be used as the sole determinant or in isolated instances to evaluate the quality of a teacher's service or fitness for retention. F. All communications, including evaluations by Milan Administrators, commendations, and documented complaints directed toward the teacher which are to be included in the personnel file shall be made available for review of the teacher prior to placement in the file; a copy of any such communication will be provided to the teacher at this time. Pre-placement information such as confidential credentials, letters of reference from universities, individuals, or previous employers are exempt from such review. A written statement for inclusion in the personnel file may then be made by the teacher in regard to materials that were not signed by the teacher. A representative of the Association may accompany the teacher. G. Ordinarily, observations of teachers shall not be for less than a full class period or for the duration of a particular teaching lesson.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!