Authority’s Review Sample Clauses

Authority’s Review. 859 If the Authority does not review and comment on, and approve or disapprove of the modification to the 860 scope of Services within ninety (90) Calendar Days of receiving the Contractor’s proposal, the proposal 861 shall be deemed disapproved. The Authority and Contractor may mutually agree to extend the time 862 period for review due to the complexity of the scope of Service modification under consideration, the 863 time needed for the review or approval, or for other reasonable reasons. 864 The Authority may request the assistance of an independent third party to review the proposal. The 865 Contractor shall pay the reasonable costs of that review if the modification to the scope of Services is 866 initiated by the Contractor and such review is reasonably necessary, as determined by the Authority 867 Contract Manager. The Authority shall pay those costs if the modification to the scope of Services is 868 initiated by the Authority. The cost of that review shall be estimated in advance of the work, and 869 provided to the Contractor for comment and agreement to pay. Contractor’s refusal to pay the 870 reasonable cost of review of a Contractor-initiated proposal shall be grounds for Authority rejection of 871 that proposal. 872 Contractor shall promptly provide operating and business Records requested by the Authority that are 873 reasonably required to verify the reasonableness and accuracy of the impacts associated with a 874 modification to the scope of Services. Contractor shall fully cooperate with the Authority’s request and 875 provide Authority and its agent(s) copies of or access to Contractor’s Records.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Authority’s Review. Authority does not have, and by this Agreement expressly disclaims, the right to or duty for any review of the Plans for the purpose of determining compliance with building codes, safety features or standards or for the purpose of determining or approving engineering or structural design, sufficiency or integrity. Authority’s approval of a direction or request to change the plans, specifications or drawings submitted by Developer is not and shall not be a review or approval of the quality, adequacy or suitability of such plans, specifications or drawings, nor of the labor, materials, services or equipment to be furnished or supplied in connection therewith. Any change or alteration in any construction document pursuant to a direction or request in writing by Authority shall similarly be subject to the provisions of this Section unless in response to such direction or request Developer or its representative shall notify Authority in writing that the direction or request, if executed as directed or requested, shall constitute a danger or hazard to life, safety or property or shall create a dangerous condition that would or might constitute such a danger or hazard and Authority nevertheless requires such change or alteration. Authority does not have and expressly disclaims any right of supervision or control over the architects, designers, engineers or other draft persons and professionals responsible for the drafting and formulation of the Plans, or any right of supervision or control of contractors, builders, trades and other persons engaged in constructing and fabricating the improvements pursuant to the Plans. Authority further acknowledges that it shall not have any right to disapprove any plan, specification or drawing which logically evolves from any previously approved plan, specification or drawing or to request or require a change in any previously approved item.
Sample 1
Authority’s Review. A. Design Review
Sample 1
Authority’s Review. Within fifteen days of receipt of a properly submitted Payment Application, Authority's Representative shall review the Payment Application to determine whether such amounts are properly due. Approval of all or any part of an Payment Application may be withheld and all or part of a previous payment may be nullified and that amount withheld from a current payment on account of any of the following:
Sample 1
Authority’s Review. Within ninety (90) Working Days of receiving the Contractor's Proposal, the Authority shall review and comment on, and approve or disapprove such Extraordinary Review request. For a Contractor-initiated Proposal, if the Authority does not respond within such time, its approval shall be deemed denied unless the Authority, at its sole discretion, extends the time periods for review due to complexity of the specific Extraordinary Review request, the time needed for review or approval, or for other reasonable reasons. The Authority may request the assistance of an independent third party to review the Proposal. The reasonable costs of such review shall be paid by the Contractor if the Extraordinary Review is initiated by the Contractor or by the Authority if the Extraordinary Review is initiated by the Authority. The cost of such review shall be estimated in advance of the work, and provided to the Contractor for comment and agreement to pay. Contractor refusal to pay the reasonable cost of review of a Contractor-initiated Proposal shall be grounds for Authority rejection of such Proposal and, at the Authority’s sole discretion, the Contractor shall be deemed in breach of Agreement. The Authority may request operating and business records from the Contractor to verify the reasonableness and accuracy of the impacts associated with an Extraordinary Review. Contractor shall fully cooperate with the Authority’s request and provide Authority and its agent(s) copies of or access to Contractor’s records.
Sample 1
Authority’s Review. Within sixty (60) Days of receiving the Contractor's proposal, the Authority shall review and comment on, and approve or disapprove such Extraordinary Review request. The Authority and Contractor may mutually agree to extend the time periods for review due to complexity of the specific Extraordinary Review request, the time needed for review or approval, or for other reasonable reasons. The Authority may request the assistance of an independent third party to review the proposal. The first $10,000 of reasonable costs shall be paid by the Contractor if the Extraordinary Review is initiated by the Contractor or by the Authority if the Extraordinary Review is initiated by Authority. Any additional costs above $10,000 shall be shared equally by Authority and Contractor. The cost of such review shall be estimated in advance of the work, and provided to the Contractor for comment and agreement to pay. Contractor refusal to pay its share of the reasonable cost of review of a Contractor-initiated proposal shall be grounds for Authority rejection of such proposal. The Authority may request from the Contractor Operating and business records reasonably required to verify the reasonableness and accuracy of the impacts associated with an Extraordinary Review. Contractor shall fully cooperate with the Authority’s request and provide Authority and its agent(s) copies of or access to Contractor’s records.
Sample 1
Authority’s Review. If the Authority does not review and comment on, and approve or 857 disapprove of the modification to the scope of services within ninety (90) Days of receiving the 858 Contractor’s proposal, the proposal will be deemed disapproved. The Authority and Contractor 859 may mutually agree to extend the time period for review due to the complexity of the scope of 860 service modification under consideration, the time needed for the review or approval, or for other 861 reasonable reasons. 862 863 The Authority may request the assistance of an independent third party to review the proposal. 864 Contractor will pay the reasonable costs of that review if the modification to the scope of services 865 is initiated by the Contractor. Authority will pay those costs if the modification to the scope of 866 services is initiated by the Authority. The cost of that review will be estimated in advance of the 17 May 2019 SBWMA/BFI Disposal Services Agreement 867 work and provided to the Contractor for comment and agreement to pay. Contractor’s refusal to 868 pay the reasonable cost of review of a Contractor-initiated proposal will be grounds for Authority 869 rejection of that proposal. 870 871 Contractor will promptly provide operating and business records requested by the Authority that 872 are reasonably required to verify the reasonableness and accuracy of the impacts associated with 873 a modification to the scope of services. Contractor will fully cooperate with the Authority’s 874 request and provide Authority and its agent(s) copies of or access to Contractor’s records. 875 876 If Contractor and Authority cannot agree on terms and conditions of services within thirty (30) 877 Days of the end of the Authority’s review period described in this subsection, the Authority may 878 permit Persons other than Contractor to provide those services at a location other than the 879 Landfill. 880
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Authority’s Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Department Review If a mutually acceptable solution has not been reached during Step 1, and the employee intends to pursue the grievance formally, the employee shall submit the grievance in writing on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form to the Department Head with a copy to the Labor Relations Division not later than ten (10) working days after the supervisor’s written response. The Department Head shall consider the grievance and render a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the formal grievance. The written decision shall include a clear and concise statement including the reason(s) for the decision. The Department Head may hold a meeting with the employee to achieve any of the following purposes: 1) to identify why the employee feels there is a grievance and facilitate communication and resolution; 2) to clearly identify issues and areas of agreement/disagreement; and 3) to have the parties present whatever available information/ documentation necessary to fully attempt to resolve the grievance. The employee may be accompanied by his/her shop xxxxxxx during the Department Review, provided that the xxxxxxx is in the same department as the employee, and has been identified by the employee on the Employee Grievance Resolution Form. If the department, in consultation with the Labor Relations Division, determines that the grievance is outside of the Department Head’s authority, or the grievance involves employees working in separate departments, then such grievance shall be submitted to Step 3.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!