Board Decisions Regarding Tenure Sample Clauses

Board Decisions Regarding Tenure. 1. Upon receiving the President’s or appropriate vice-president’s recommendation regarding the award or non-award of tenure or the non-renewal of a contract of the evaluated candidate(s), the Board of Trustees may meet with the chair of the Appointment Review Committee, Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president, and any representative of a minority report, if applicable, to examine the records of the candidate(s). The Board shall give reasonable consideration to the recommendation of the College President or appropriate vice-president as to the award or non-award of tenure or the non-renewal of a contract to said candidate(s). The Board shall receive recommendations from both the Appointment Review Committee and College President/Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice-president; provided, however, if the President or Vice President makes a recommendation that is contrary to the recommendation of the Appointment Review Committee, s/he shall discuss such differences with the committee prior to her/his recommendation to the Board. 2. All Board decisions regarding the award or non-award of tenure to candidates considered pursuant to this section shall be accomplished by no later than the end of the eighth probationary quarter. Written notice of such award or non-award shall be transmitted by the Board to the candidate no later than the end of the eighth probationary quarter.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Board Decisions Regarding Tenure. 1. Upon receiving the various recommendations regarding the award or non-award of tenure or the non-renewal of a contract of the evaluated probationers, the Board shall examine the records of the probationer(s) so referred to them and give reasonable consideration to the recommendation of the tenure review committee as to the award or non-award of tenure, renewal or the non-renewal of a contract, or extension of the probationary period to said probationer or probationers. 2. Following the Board’s review of the evaluation reports, the District President shall advise the committee and the probationer in writing of any other concerns which the Board or the District President might have which could result in the probationer not being granted tenure or the probationary period being extended (see E.
Board Decisions Regarding Tenure. 1. Upon receiving the various recommendations regarding the award or non- award of tenure or the nonrenewal of a contract of the evaluated probationers, the Board shall, before its final meeting of the 2nd, 5th and 8th quarters of a probationer’s employment, examine the records of the probationer(s) so referred to them and give reasonable consideration to the recommendation of the probationary review committee as to the award or non-award of tenure or the nonrenewal of a contract to said probationer or probationers. 2. All Board decisions regarding the award or non-award of tenure to probationers considered pursuant to this section shall be accomplished by no later than the last day of the 2nd, 5th and 8th quarter of a probationer’s employment. Written notice of such award or non-award shall be transmitted by the Board to the probationer no later than the last day of the 2nd, 5th and 8th quarter of a probationer’s employment. 3. The final decision to award or withhold tenure, or to continue probationary status for faculty, shall rest with the Board, after it has given reasonable consideration to the recommendation of the Probationary Review Committee and the College President. Any recommendations of the Probationary Review Committee and the President shall be advisory only and not binding upon the Board. The Faculty Association and the President agree that the ultimate authority to grant or deny tenure, or continuing probationary status, for faculty is vested with the Board. 4. In the case of the award of tenure, all probationary source documents, including all original evaluations, will be destroyed upon satisfactory completion by the newly tenured faculty member of the first tenured faculty evaluation cycle (Article XIX). Within thirty (30) calendar days the faculty member being evaluated may indicate in writing on the summary evaluation document that they choose to have the source documents retained in their personnel file.
Board Decisions Regarding Tenure. 1 Upon receiving the President’s or appropriate vice-president’s recommendation regarding the award or non-award of tenure or the non-renewal of a contract of the evaluated candidate(s), the Board of Trustees may meet with the chair of the Appointment Review Committee, Vice President for Academic Affairs or appropriate vice president, and any representative of a minority report, if applicable, to examine the records of the candidate(s). The Board shall give reasonable consideration to the recommendation of the College President or appropriate vice-president as to the award or non-award of tenure or the non-renewal of a contract to said candidate(s). The Board shall receive recommendations from both the Appointment Review Committee and College President/Vice President for Academic Affairs or appropriate vice-president; provided, however, if the President or Vice President makes a recommendation that is contrary to the recommendation of the Appointment Review Committee, s/he shall discuss such differences with the committee prior to her/his recommendation to the Board.
Board Decisions Regarding Tenure. 1. Upon receiving the President’s or appropriate vice-president’s recommendation regarding the award or non-award of tenure or the non-renewal of a contract of the evaluated candidate(s), the Board of Trustees may meet with the chair of the Appointment Review Committee or appropriate vice- president, and any representative of a minority report, if applicable, to examine the records of the candidate(s). The Board shall give reasonable consideration to the recommendation of the College President or appropriate vice-president as to the award or non-award of tenure or the non-renewal of a contract to said candidate(s). The Board shall receive recommendations from both the Appointment Review Committee and College President or appropriate vice-president; provided, however, if the President or VP makes a recommendation that is contrary to the recommendation of the Appointment Review Committee, the President or VP shall discuss such differences with the committee prior to recommendation to the Board. 2. Per RCW 28B.50.852, the Board of Trustees may award tenure at any time following a probationary period not to exceed nine consecutive college quarters and after it has given reasonable consideration to the recommendations of the Appointment Review Committee. If the Board of Trustees does not award tenure to a candidate recommended for the six-quarter tenure process, the candidate is not automatically precluded from receiving tenure in a later quarter; the Board may elect to renew the probationary period for a third year. 3. All Board decisions regarding the award or non-award of tenure to candidates considered pursuant to this section shall be accomplished by no later than the end of the fifth quarter (six-quarter process) or eighth probationary quarter. Written notice of such award or non-award shall be transmitted by the Board to the candidate no later than the end of the fifth quarter (six-quarter process) or eighth probationary quarter, respectively.

Related to Board Decisions Regarding Tenure

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Review by the Bank of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Bank’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Bank.

  • Major Decisions any proposed or actual foreclosure upon or comparable conversion of the ownership of the Property or the exercise of any other remedies with respect to the Loan;

  • Review by the World Bank of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the World Bank’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the World Bank.

  • EMPLOYMENT POLICY AND UNION MEMBERSHIP 5.01 The Union and the Employer will cooperate in maintaining a desirable and competent labour force. The Employer will notify the Union of manpower requirements giving as much prior notice as possible. The Union will provide a list of manpower available. The Employer at its discretion may hire employees so listed or from other sources. 5.02 The Employer has the right to hire new employees as needed, provided that no new employee(s) will be hired while there are available employees on layoff qualified to do the work. 5.03 New employees will be hired on a three (3) month probationary period, and thereafter shall attain regular employment status. Their respective seniority shall be dated back to the date of their last hiring by the Employer. 5.04 Probationary employees are covered by the Agreement, excepting those provisions which specifically exclude such employees. 5.05 The Employer and the Union will endeavour to make use of an apprenticeship program for employees hired in the Skilled Xxxxxxx Helper and Xxxxxxx Helper classifications. The parties recognize the Employer's legitimate concern to maintain control over the availability of manpower especially at peak work periods. 5.06 Neither the Employer nor the Union will compel employees to join the Union. The Employer will not discriminate against any employees because of Union membership or lack of it, and will inform all new employees of the contractual relationship between the Employer and the Union. Before commencing work, any new employee will be referred by the Employer to a xxxxxxx or Local 52 Representative in order to give such xxxxxxx or Local 52 Representative an opportunity to describe the Union's purposes and representation policies to such new employees.

  • Recognition of Union Stewards and Grievance Committee In order to provide an orderly and speedy procedure for the settling of grievances, the Employer acknowledges the rights and duties of the Union Stewards. The Xxxxxxx shall assist any Employee, which the Xxxxxxx represents, in preparing and presenting her grievance in accordance with the grievance procedure.

  • Joint Union/Management Committee It shall be appropriate for either the Union or the University to request that a Joint Union/Management committee be convened, with Environmental Health and Safety as a participating member, to discuss health and safety concerns and to explore options for addressing those concerns through appropriate training or other approaches.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!