BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. The Satellite Agreement with Cooley has positive revenue considerations as well as costs associated with it. There is a commitment of space in X’Xxxx Xxxx for classrooms, faculty and staff offices, library and other support spaces. There is an item later on the Board’s agenda that requests authorization to reconfigure Room 202 in X’Xxxx for suitable classroom space. Xxxxxx has agreed to pay $219,000 to cover an estimated half of the cost to renovate the portion of this modified space that Cooley would use, as well as to cover costs to make modest improvements in office and library space. On the revenue side, as part of the Satellite Agreement, Oakland will receive 8% of gross tuition revenue each semester, with a guaranteed minimum payment of $25,000 per semester. In 2003, the total annual payment is projected to be between $100,000 and $200,000, depending on actual enrollment and retention. When all three cohorts are in place for the full two-year program in 2005, the annual payment to Oakland is estimated to be between $475,000 and $800,000, depending on actual enrollments and retention. Satellite Agreement Between Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Law School and Oakland University March 5, 2003
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. The termination of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement with the Republic of the Comoros has no budgetary implications. No amounts relating to a new protocol replacing the protocol that expired on 31.12.2016 were budgeted in the reserve for the 2017 budget and the draft 2018 budget.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. No budgetary implications are foreseen.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. No impact on the EU budget • Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements On the EU side, EASA will coordinate the implementation of the new FCL Annex. The detailed procedures concerning the implementation will be defined in the Implementing Procedures for Licensing (IPL), which are currently being finalised by the Technical Agents EASA and FAA (in time for the adoption of the new FCL annex). The monitoring of the implementation of the FCL Annex will be performed in the first place by the Joint Aircrew Coordination Board (JCAB), which will be accountable to the BOB established under the Agreement. The JCAB will report to the BOB on a regular basis. • Explanatory documents (for directives) Not applicable • Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal
Section 1 ‘ Purpose and scope’ That section of the FCL Annex explains its scope and purpose, which is reciprocal acceptance of findings of compliance and documentation, and the provision of technical assistance regarding private pilot licensing and compliance monitoring. The scope of the Annex covers private pilot EU Part-FCL licenses and FAA private pilot certificates, and private pilot privileges included in other EU Part-FCL licenses and FAA pilot certificates, as well as night and instrument ratings, in single engine piston land airplane and multi-engine piston land airplane categories in single-pilot operations, excluding any type ratings. Section 2 ‘Definitions’ That section of the FCL Annex defines some of the frequently used technical terms. Section 3 ‘Joint Aircrew Coordination Board’ That section establishes the Joint Aircrew Coordination Board (JCAB), which will be accountable to the XXX and will be responsible for ensuring the effective implementation of the FCL Annex. The JCAB is co-chaired by the EASA and FAA Directors of Flight Standards. The main responsibilities of the JCAB include: Developing, approving, and revising the Implementing Procedures for Licensing (IPL); Sharing information on relevant safety issues and developing action plans to address them; Ensuring the consistent application of the Annex; Exchanging information on planned and ongoing rulemaking activities that could affect the basis and scope of the Annex; Sharing information on significant changes to the Parties’ pilot licensing systems that could affect the basis and scope of the Annex; Resolving technical issues falling within the responsibilities of the Technical Agents and Av...
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. This proposal has no impact on the EU budget. 2016/0081 (NLE) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular to Article 218(9) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. Approval:
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. No impact on the EU budget • Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements On the EU side, EASA will coordinate the implementation of the new FSTD Annex. The detailed procedures concerning the implementation will be defined in the Simulator Implementation Procedures (SIP), which are currently being finalised by the Technical Agents EASA and FAA (in time for the adoption of the new FSTD annex). The monitoring of the implementation of the FSTD Annex will be performed in the first place by the FSTD Oversight Board (FOB) which will be accountable to the XXX established under the Agreement. The FOB will report to the XXX on a regular basis. • Explanatory documents (for directives) Not applicable • Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal Section 1 ‘Purpose and scope’ That section of the FSTD Xxxxx explains the purpose of the Annex, which is reciprocal acceptance of findings of compliance and documentation, and the provision of technical assistance regarding recurrent evaluation and qualification of FFS. The scope of the Annex covers recurrent evaluation and continuing qualification of FFS for airplanes that hold a qualification issued by the FAA and by EASA or an Aviation Authority of an EU Member State.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. Not applicable. 2016/0192 (NLE) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2), in conjunction with Article 218(6) (a) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS. Only human and administrative resources are required; these are set out in the legislative financial statement. In the light of the above considerations, the Commission requests that the Council: - approves, on behalf of the Union, and with the consent of the European Parliament, the renewal of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Federative Republic of Brazil which will apply, following the expiry of the five years, for an additional period of five years (i.e., from 08.08.2017 until 07.08.2022) - authorise the President of the Council to designate the person(s) empowered to notify the Government of the Federative Republic of Brazil that the Union has completed the internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of this renewed Agreement 2017/0139 (NLE) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 186, in conjunction with point (v) of Article 218(6)(a) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,
