Command and Control. As we have seen, early environmental policy in the Netherlands was based on the Nuisance Act of 1875. Its main instrument to control danger, damage and nuisance caused by industry was a licensing procedure. In that sense, the Nuisance Act was the direct precursor of the specific, so-called ‘sectoral’ laws dealing with water pollution, air pollution, waste and noise, among others, that were enacted from the late 1960s in response to growing environmental concern. Competent authorities as well as procedures were different for each of these Acts. While municipalities remained responsible for granting licences to a large number of small polluters, predominantly under the Nuisance Act, competences with regard to larger and more complex installations and processes were concentrated at the provincial level. Authority for the Air Pollution Act (1970), for instance, lay entirely with the provinces. The Surface Water Pollution Act (1969) is an exceptional case in two respects. First, it is administered jointly by the semi-autonomous water boards (mainly regarding the smaller water courses) and the regional branches of the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management (larger water courses). Second, it was the first, and for a long time the only, environmental law that made use of a substantive regulatory levy, which was highly successful in curbing organic discharges into surface water (cf. Xxxxxxxx, 1983; Xxxxxxxx, 1994; Xxxxxxxxxx, 1997b: 87–92). Only from the second half of the 1990s were ‘green’ taxes applied more widely in the Netherlands (Xxxxxxxxx, 2002: 74–75).
Command and Control. The parties recognize the need for a qualified and experienced person to function in the role of a public health local health officer in Party HDs’ jurisdictions and Party TGs’ jurisdictions, and for public health laws to govern the response. Party TGs may not have Tribal Health Officers on their staffs or on contract at the time that a Public Health Incident, Emergency or Disaster occurs. Party TGs also may not have adopted public health codes, or may have adopted codes that govern certain public health issues but not others. Until such time that a Party TG hires or contracts with its own Tribal Health Officer, and adopts a public health code(s) governing the specific public health issue necessitating response, the Party TG and Party HDs agree that in the event of a Public Health Incident, Emergency or Disaster, communicable disease outbreak, or isolation or quarantine event, Party TGs will choose to exercise tribal public health authority in one of the following manners: Option One:
1. The Party TG may decide to grant to the Party HD in its closest geographical proximity permission to exercise public health authority, in consultation with the Party TG’s health director, over the Party TG’s Tribal Lands, People on Tribal Lands and members off Tribal Lands but within the respective Party HD’s county.
2. In the event the Party TG has not yet adopted a public health code(s) that addresses the specific public health response, then the Party HD and Party TG agree that the Party HD will exercise this grant of authority in conformance with federal, state and local public health laws that address the specific public health response, and such public health laws shall be deemed applicable as if adopted as tribal code. Party TGs shall be responsible to take such actions as are necessary to implement this provision, if any. Examples of the types of Washington State laws that a Party TG might agree to voluntarily invoke include those related to tuberculosis control, sexually transmitted disease control, substantial exposure to bodily fluids, communicable disease control, isolation and quarantine, biomedical wastes, emergency response, or other law.
3. If the Party TG has adopted a public health code(s) that addresses the specific public health response, then the Party HD and Party TG agree that the Party HD will exercise this grant of authority in conformance with applicable tribal, federal, state and local public health laws. If there is a conflict between or among t...
Command and Control. Specific Contractor requirements must be coordinated and approved prior to the event by the Sheriff or the Sheriff's designee. In order to assure proper supervision of an event where security services are requested, at least every five (5) deputies employed must be a PCSO supervisor. The Sheriff or the Sheriff’s designee must authorize any exceptions in advance. It is understood that by law and PCSO policy, PCSO law enforcement personnel have specific legal and ethical responsibilities to fairly and impartially perform their duties. The deputies are required to follow all PCSO Policies, Regulations, and Procedures and no contractor can supersede or circumscribe these obligations. Off duty PCSO law enforcement personnel will not perform non-enforcement duties nor accept law enforcement related direction from any employees or management of the contractor.
Command and Control. The Command and Control test will be executed on all Space Vehicles. During this test the control facility will exercise a Seller defined set of remote commands, beginning with the least critical ones and verify the correct execution. During this test selected Built-in-Test routines will be executed by the Space Vehicle and the results reviewed at the control facility. Commands supporting the safe mode operation will also be exercised.
Command and Control a. XxXX personnel employed in support of the DOI will be under the command of and directly responsible to the senior GaNG member present. The senior GaNG member present will receive direction from the DOI bureau commander in all matters relating to law enforcement.
b. Missions will be executed through the GaNG chain of command, subject to operational needs, as determined by the DOI bureau commander. Tactical direction of GaNG personnel and the particular means to be employed will be left solely to the senior GaNG member present, except in matters relating to law enforcement activities and emergencies.
c. GaNG Pilots in Command (PC) will retain final authority over operation of military aircraft and vehicles in matters relating to safety, security, and equipment.
d. The Senior GaNG member present will retain final authority over the assignment of duties to GaNG personnel. GaNG personnel will make every effort possible to provide requested support. All support provided will be in keeping with the intent of this MOU.
Command and Control. The command and control committees and mechanisms should be composed of the following five levels:
Command and Control at the Emergency Scene
Command and Control. Immediate command and control over all of the Grantee’s resources and personnel employed in accordance with this Grant Agreement shall rest with the Grantee at all times. All of the Grantee’s operations conducted pursuant to this Grant Agreement shall be conducted in strict accordance with applicable laws and regulations and Grantee directives.
Command and Control. The EJFR Duty Chief shall be in command of PLFR personnel at emergency scenes and for daily operations. The PLFR Board Chair or designee shall be notified by the EJFR Fire Chief or designee of any major PLFR incidents once the incident has stabilized.
Command and Control. Systems Please describe the systems/methods used to control the UAS during flight; include frequencies where appropriate.
3.1 Control Method - primary and secondary 3.2 Satellite or Line of Sight
