Communication of Evaluation Results Sample Clauses

Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare report(s) that document the evaluation process of the candidate’s strengths and recommendations for improvement as applicable. The committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the candidate with a copy of the written report(s). 2. Copies of the written report(s) shall be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs and appropriate vice president, who will forward them to the College President. The College President will submit the written report(s) to the Board of Trustees. 3. At a minimum, the following Appointment Review Committee reports will be submitted to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs or appropriate vice president on or before the dates specified below: a. A written progress report outlining the evaluation process, all evaluation results, areas of strength and those needing improvement, and specific steps that can be taken by the candidate to improve. Submitted by the last day of the first probationary quarter. b. A comprehensive evaluation report that includes documentation of the process, all evaluative material collected during the college year, summary of progress, and recommendation for continued probationary status or tenure. Submitted by the dates indicated below: (1) For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by February 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by March 1 for evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters; and by March 1 for evaluation of the first and second quarters. (2) For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by May 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by May 20 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by May 20 for evaluation of the first and second quarters. (3) For candidates whose appointments begin in a spring quarter, by November 15 for evaluation of the sixth, seventh and eighth quarters; by November 15 for evaluation of the third, fourth and fifth quarters; and by November 15 for evaluation of the first and second quarters. 4. When areas needing improvement in the performance of a candidate are noted by the Appointment Review Committee, the following steps will be taken by the committee: a. Specific areas needing improvement will be outlined in writing and discussed with the candidate within five (5) days of the conclusion ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. A written evaluation noting areas of proficiency or deficiency shall be made for each observation. 2. Within 10 days after each observation, the observer shall meet with the probationer to discuss his/her performance and the evaluation report. 3. Each tenure review committee shall meet in person, or via ITV (at least to finalize the document) and produce the following documents: a. Nine-standard Evaluation: The committee will summarize a written report evaluating the probationer with respect to the nine standards listed above. This document will incorporate information from each of the evaluation processes including student evaluation, self-evaluations, peer evaluations and the administrative evaluation. This document will be referred to as the nine-standard evaluation summary. b. Minority Opinion(s): If a committee member does not agree with the majority opinion on a particular standard or if the committee is split in its opinion, the committee will include a second (minority) opinion as part of this document. If a member does not submit a second opinion, he/she is considered to support the evaluation as written for that standard.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Communication of Evaluation Results. 1. A written evaluation noting areas of proficiency or deficiency shall be made for each observation. 2. Within 10 days after each observation, the observer shall meet with the probationer to discuss his/her performance and the evaluation report. 3. Each tenure review committee shall meet as a body and produce the following documents: a. Nine-standard evaluation: The committee will summarize a written report evaluating the probationer with respect to the nine standards listed above. This document will incorporate information from each of the evaluation processes including student evaluation, self-evaluations, peer evaluations and the administrative evaluation. This document will be referred to as the nine-standard evaluation summary. b. Minority Opinion(s): If a committee member does not agree with the majority opinion on a particular standard or if the committee is split in its opinion, the committee will include a second (minority) opinion as part of this document. If a member does not submit a second opinion, he/she is considered to support the evaluation as written for that standard.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Communication of Evaluation Results. 10.11.01 Each Tenure Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, shall meet as a body and prepare an annual TRC Evaluation Report. This report shall be a comprehensive evaluation of the candidate based on the criteria identified in Article
Sample 1Sample 2
Communication of Evaluation Results. 00 00.00.00 Each Tenure Review Committee, as part of its ongoing evaluation of the candidate, 21 shall meet as a body and prepare an annual TRC Evaluation Report. This report 22 shall be a comprehensive evaluation of the candidate based on the criteria 23 identified in 10.06. It shall provide commendations and suggestions for 24 improvement as applicable and shall clearly state the TRC’s recommendation on 1 the continued progress of the candidate through the tenure process. The 2 committee will meet with the candidate to discuss the report(s) and furnish the 3 candidate with a copy of the written report(s), prior to submitting the report(s) to 4 anyone other than the candidate. 5 10.11.01.01 If the committee’s recommendation is not unanimous, a minority report will be 6 generated and also become part of the record. 7 10.11.01.02 The committee’s report(s) will be signed by each member and include any minority 8 recommendation. 9 10.11.02 For First and Second year candidates, the Tenure Review Committee 10 Recommendation Report shall be issued in accordance with the following 11 schedule: 12 10.11.02.01.01 For candidates whose appointments begin in fall quarter, by the first Monday 13 after May 1 (in their first year) for evaluation of the first and second 14 quarters; by the first Monday after May 1 (in their second year) for 15 evaluation of the third, fourth, and fifth quarters 16 For candidates whose appointments begin in winter quarter, by the first
Sample 1

Related to Communication of Evaluation Results

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Information About You and Your Visits to the Website All information we collect on this Website is subject to our Privacy Policy. By using the Website, you consent to all actions taken by us with respect to your information in compliance with the Privacy Policy.

  • Submission of Grievance Information a. Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the appealing party shall, within five (5) days after notice of appointment, forward to the arbitrator, with a copy to the School Board, the submission of the grievance which shall include the following: 1. The issues involved. 2. Statement of the facts. 3. Position of the grievant. 4. The written documents relating to Section 5 of the grievance procedure.

  • Line Information Database (LIDB 9.1 BellSouth will store in its Line Information Database (LIDB) records relating to service only in the BellSouth region. The LIDB Storage Agreement is included in this Attachment as Exhibit C. 9.2 BellSouth will provide LIDB Storage upon written request to <<customer_name>>’s Account Manager stating a requested activation date.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!