Peer Evaluations a. Peer evaluations shall be conducted by a faculty member from the candidate’s department, chosen by the faculty member with the approval of the chairperson. The faculty member to be evaluated and the faculty member to do the evaluation shall agree upon a time for the evaluation. Within one week of the evaluation, the evaluator shall submit a written report to the faculty member evaluated and the Department Chairperson. If the faculty member evaluated wishes, s/he may append a written response to the report before placing it in his/her record file.
b. It is recommended that at least one peer evaluation be done each year for tenured faculty and two per year for those who have not attained tenure.
Peer Evaluations. A probationary faculty member may, during any academic year solicit three confidential peer evaluations. The peer evaluations shall be sought from tenured faculty members mutually agreed upon by the probationary faculty member and the appropriate Academic Xxxx or administrative designee. The participation of tenured faculty in peer evaluations shall be voluntary. Peer evaluations shall be sent to the Vice President for Academic and Student Affairs not later than 90 days prior to the end of the academic year.
Peer Evaluations. Evaluative materials, or summaries thereof, prepared by peer(s) as part of a regular evaluation system, may be placed in an evaluation file when signed by the evaluator or a representative of a peer committee, with a copy provided to the employee. The employee being evaluated shall have the opportunity to review and sign the evaluation prior to it being placed in the evaluation file.
Peer Evaluations. 11.7.1 Peer evaluations will be conducted annually by each member of the Tenure Review Committee in the form of observations. Faculty should refer to Appendix M: “In-Person Classroom Observation Reporting Form” and Appendix N: “On-Line Classroom Observation Reporting Form.”
11.7.2 In the first four weeks of the Fall semester, each Tenure Review Committee member will meet with the faculty member to individually discuss and determine goals and areas of growth to be the focus of the observation.
11.7.3 Peer evaluations in the form of observation must be conducted between week 4 and week 13 of the term.
11.7.4 The Tenure Review Committee member must meet with the faculty member within two weeks of the observation to discuss, review, and sign off on the observation.
Peer Evaluations. In the event that another part-time faculty member is appointed 45 to serve as a peer evaluator by the evaluating administrator or the faculty 1 member’s department, then they shall be paid for their time at the Other 2 Professional Assignment Rate.
Peer Evaluations. The Member may choose a fellow faculty Member, who visits a class, interviews the individual, examines student evaluations and annual reports of professional activities (if the individual under review has chosen to provide copies of these materials), and writes an appraisal of the Member's performance according to the criteria established by GFC from time to time. Copies of the written reports are distributed to the Member, both administrative evaluators, and the appropriate Xxxx'x office and the Human Resources Office.
Peer Evaluations. Each peer will make a scheduled visit and evaluate at least one classroom presentation. Most or all of the sections taught by the faculty member should be evaluated by the FEC. Peers shall also review and evaluate instructional materials, which may include but are not limited to, course syllabi, example tests, and any major assignments, projects, or reports. Conclusions regarding the evaluations will be reported to the immediate administrator using the Faculty Evaluation Form (Schedule F-2).
Peer Evaluations. Counselors, librarians, and other nonteaching faculty will be evaluated using the standard approved faculty evaluation form (Schedule F-2). However, where specific job descriptions exist, they should be reviewed by the faculty member’s peers and administrator performing the evaluations and used where appropriate in their assessment of the faculty member’s performance.
Peer Evaluations a. Peer evaluations shall be conducted by a faculty member from the candidate’s department, chosen by the Chairperson. The faculty member to be evaluated and the faculty member to do the evaluation shall agree upon a time for the evaluation. Within one week of the evaluation, the evaluator shall submit a written report to the faculty member evaluated and the Department Chairperson. If the faculty member evaluated wishes, s/he may append a written response to the report before placing it in his/her record file.
b. It is recommended that at least one peer evaluation be done each year for tenured faculty and two per year for those who have not attained tenure.
Peer Evaluations. Participation in a peer evaluation process is optional as outlined: • The employee being evaluated may elect to request input from peers on their work performance. DDococusuSiigngn EEnvnvelelopeope IID:D: C273F0A8DC1ECB1B--A3166FF2--4D4C9386--AA2DDE8C--659F2EA4C8A64D1B2BB65F37 • If the employee seeks peer input, they may elect to have the information returned directly to the employee. • The employee is not required to share this peer input with their manager. • This peer review input will not be placed in the employee’s personnel file. Peer evaluations are voluntary, however, this understanding does not preclude management from seeking additional co-worker input for evaluation purposes. If requested, the manager will advise the employee as to who had input into the employee’s evaluation.
