Compliance Rate Sample Clauses

Compliance Rate. The compliance rate is US$ 0.75 per Licensed Product Sold.

Compliance Rate. During normal business hours, the minimum standards set forth in this Section 9.3 shall be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time, measured on a monthly basis. Reports shall be provided to the City on a monthly basis providing a log of inquiries received and action taken to address each complaint and call. The Contractor shall also distribute to the City a log providing data which tracks the customer service representatives’ adherence to the standards set forth in Section 9.3(a) through 9.3(g) of this Agreement, as the City may request in its discretion, on a monthly basis. If the records indicate a clear failure of the Contractor to comply with the minimum standards set forth in Sections 9.3(a) through 9.3(g) of this Agreement, then the City reserves the right to require the Contractor to implement modifications to its customer service center to bring it into compliance with the requirements of this Section 9.3.

Compliance Rate. During normal business hours, the minimum standards set forth in this Section 9.3 shall be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time, measured on a monthly basis. Reports shall be provided to the Village on a monthly basis providing a log of inquiries received and action taken to address each complaint and call. The Contractor shall also distribute to the Village a log providing data which tracks the customer service representatives’ adherence to the standards set forth in Section 9.3(a) through 9.3(g) of this Agreement, as the Village may request in its discretion, on a monthly basis. The Village reserves the right to audit the Contractor’s complaint procedures as required by this Section

Compliance Rate. During normal business hours, the minimum standards set forth in this Section 9.3 shall be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time, measured on a monthly basis. Reports shall be provided to the Village on a monthly basis providing a log of inquiries received and action taken to address each complaint and call. The Contractor shall also distribute to the Village a log providing data which tracks the customer service representatives’ adherence to the standards set forth in Section 9.3(a) through 9.3(g) of this Agreement, as the Village may request in its discretion, on a monthly basis. The Village reserves the right to audit the Contractor’s complaint procedures as required by this Section 9.3.If the records and/or audit indicate a clear failure of the Contractor to comply with the minimum standards set forth in Sections 9.3(a) through 9.3(g) of this Agreement, then the Village reserves the right to require the Contractor to implement modifications to its customer service center to bring it into compliance with the requirements of this Section 9.3.

Compliance Rate. The Procurement Department should ensure a 100% compliance rate with all applicable procurement laws and regulations.

Compliance Rate. Ensuring all staffing placements comply with relevant regulations and client requirements. This metric tracks the percentage of placements that meet compliance standards. • Quality of Hire: Assessing the performance and fit of new hires through client feedback and performance evaluations during the initial months of employment. • Employee Retention Rate: Monitoring the retention rates of placed candidates. High retention rates indicate successful placements and job satisfaction among employees. • Employee Engagement Scores: Conducting regular surveys to measure the engagement and satisfaction of our staff. Engaged employees are more likely to deliver high-quality service. * 64 Identify a proposed administrative fee that you will pay to Sourcewell for facilitating, managing, and promoting the Sourcewell Contract in the event that you are awarded a Contract. This fee is typically calculated as a percentage of Vendor's sales under the Contract or as a per-unit fee; it is not a line-item addition to the Member's cost of goods. (See the RFP and template Contract for additional details.) We will pay an administrative fee of 2% to sourcewell for facilitating, managing, and promoting the Sourcewell Contract in the event that we will be awarded a Contract. Also, FedTec would like Sourcewell to commit its collaboration in marketing for the capabilities and services provided by FedTec. *

Compliance Rate. ○ Target: Meet 100% compliance with regulatory standards, including PII, HIPAA, ▇▇▇, and WCAG 2.1 AA. ○ Method: Conduct routine audits of security, accessibility, and data handling processes.

Compliance Rate. During normal business hours except during unusually heavy call periods due to pick-up delays caused by weather or other events beyond the CONTRACTOR'S control, the minimum standards set forth in this Contract shall be met no less than ninety percent (90%) of the time, measured on a monthly basis. Reports shall be provided to the VILLAGE on a quarterly basis providing a log of the inquiries received and action taken to address the inquiry. If the VILLAGE, at its sole discretion, feels it is necessary, a log providing data which tracks the customer service representatives adherence to the standards set forth in this Contract will be required to be distributed to the VILLAGE on a monthly basis. If a review of the records indicates a clear failure of the operator to comply with the minimum standards set forth in this Contract, then the VILLAGE reserves the right to require the operator to implement modifications to its customer service center to bring it into compliance. Repeated failure of the operator to gain compliance with the terms of this Contract shall be grounds for the VILLAGE to terminate this Contract without liability to the CONTRACTOR.

Compliance Rate. In summary, 24 of the 27 decisions by Ministerial councils and intergovernmental standard-setting bodies reported during the year to 31 March 2003 satisfied CoAG requirements. The compliance rate of 89 per cent represented a decline on the 97 per cent rate in the previous year, but an improvement on the 71 per cent compliance rate reported in the ▇▇▇’▇ first report to the Council (which covered the 11 months to 31 May 2001). Of the 27 decisions reported over the year to 31 March 2003, the ▇▇▇ considered six to be more significant than others, based on the magnitude of the problem and the regulatory proposals, and the scope and intensity of the proposals’ impacts on the affected parties and the community. Two of these six decisions were made without complying with CoAG requirements: (1) the introduction of mandatory comparison of interest rates and (2) the acceptance of the Ipp recommendations on public liability. The ▇▇▇ attributes the decline in compliance in the latest reporting year to the following factors: • the allocation of decision-making in some cases to ad hoc groups or committees that are not aware of CoAG requirements; • some Ministerial councils’ lack of awareness of the requirements, possibly due to the alternating of the secretariat function between jurisdictions; • some decision-making bodies not being aware that the CoAG requirements extend beyond legislation to decisions implemented through other means; • a mistaken belief in some cases that a CoAG RIS is not required if a decision on a broad national approach necessitates a regulatory response at the State or Territory level; and • deliberate non-compliance with the CoAG requirements. The ▇▇▇ notes that several secretariats of Ministerial councils and intergovernmental standard-setting bodies have sought to improve the quality of their adherence to the CoAG requirements. Further, the ▇▇▇ has continued to provide relevant government officials with training on the requirements.