Confirmation of Test Results Sample Clauses

Confirmation of Test Results a. Employees notified of a positive alcohol test result may request the opportunity to have a blood sample drawn for analysis at either a hospital or certified testing lab as chosen by the Employer. b. Employees notified of a positive drug test may request that the Medical Review Officer send a portion of their first sample to the hospital or HHS certified laboratory of the employee’s choice for testing by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. c. The cost of employee requested tests are the responsibility of the employee. If the test results are negative, the Employer will reimburse the employee for the cost of the test.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Confirmation of Test Results. 8.1 AMR will designate a Medical Review Officer (“MRO”) who shall be a licensed physician with knowledge of drug and alcohol abuse disorders. The MRO shall perform the following functions:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Confirmation of Test Results. A. An employee whose drug test yields a positive result shall be given a second test using a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry(GC\MS) test. The second test shall use a portion of the same test sample withdrawn from the employee or applicant for use in the first test. B. If the second test confirms the positive test result, the employee shall be notified of the result in writing by the appropriate department Head or designee; the particular substance found and its concentration level. The following cutoff levels shall be used for the confirmation screening. All levels equal to or exceeding these levels shall be reported as positive: 1. Alcohol (Ethyl) 0.04 g% 2. Amphetamines (e.g., Speed) 500 mg/ml 3. Barbiturates
Sample 1
Confirmation of Test Results. 8.1 AMR will designate a Medical Review Officer (“MRO”) who shall be a licensed physician with knowledge of drug and alcohol abuse disorders. The MRO shall perform the following functions: (a) Review and interpret each confirmed positive test result to determine if there is an alternative medical explanation for the result. The MRO should: (1) Conduct a medical interview with the individual tested. (2) Review the individual’s medical history and any relevant biomedical factors. (3) Review all medical records made available by the individual tested to determine if a confirmed positive test resulted from a legally prescribed medication. (4) If necessary, require that the original specimen be reanalyzed to determine the accuracy of the reported test result. (5) Verify that the laboratory report and assessment are correct. 8.2 The MRO review of confirmed positive test results shall conclude with one of the following determinations: (a) There is a legitimate medical explanation for the confirmed positive test result other than unauthorized use of a controlled substance. This shall be reported to AMR as a negative test and shall be recorded in the employee’s medical file. (b) Based on a review of laboratory inspection reports, quality assurance and quality control data, and other drug test results, the MRO may conclude that a particular drug test result is scientifically insufficient for further action. This shall be reported to AMR as a negative test and shall be recorded in the employee’s medical file. (c) The MRO determines, after appropriate review, that there is no legitimate medical explanation for the confirmed positive test result other than the unauthorized use of a controlled substance or alcohol. This shall be reported to AMR as a positive test and shall be recorded in the employee’s medical file.
Sample 1

Related to Confirmation of Test Results

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • Positive Test Results In the event an employee tests positive for drug use, the employee will be provided, in writing, notice of their right to explain the test results. The employee may indicate any relevant circumstance, including over the counter or prescription medication taken within the last thirty (30) days, or any other information relevant to the reliability of, or explanation for, a positive test result.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Contract Monitoring The criminal background checks required by this rule shall be national in scope, and must be conducted at least once every three (3) years. Contractor shall make the criminal background checks required by Paragraph IV.G.1 available for inspection and copying by DRS personnel upon request of DRS.

  • Third Party Verification 4.8.1 The SPD shall be further required to provide entry to the site of the Power Project free of all encumbrances at all times during the Term of the Agreement to SECI and a third Party nominated by any Indian Governmental Instrumentality for inspection and verification of the works being carried out by the SPD at the site of the Power Project. 4.8.2 The third party may verify the construction works/operation of the Power Project being carried out by the SPD and if it is found that the construction works/operation of the Power Project is not as per the Prudent Utility Practices, it may seek clarifications from SPD or require the works to be stopped or to comply with the instructions of such third party.

  • CERTIFICATION REGARDING CERTAIN FOREIGN-OWNED COMPANIES IN CONNECTION WITH CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: Proposing Company is prohibited from entering into a contract or other agreement relating to critical infrastructure that would grant to the company direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure in this state, excluding access specifically allowed by the Proposing Company for product warranty and support purposes. Company, certifies that neither it nor its parent company nor any affiliate of company or its parent company, is (1) owned by or the majority of stock or other ownership interest of the company is held or controlled by individuals who are citizens of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; (2) a company or other entity, including governmental entity, that is owned or controlled by citizens of or is directly controlled by the government of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country; or (3) headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country. For purposes of this contract, “critical infrastructure” means “a communication infrastructure system, cybersecurity system, electric grid, hazardous waste treatment system, or water treatment facility.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.0101(2) of SB 1226 (87th leg.). The company verifies and certifies that company will not grant direct or remote access to or control of critical infrastructure, except for product warranty and support purposes, to prohibited individuals, companies, or entities, including governmental entities, owned, controlled, or headquartered in China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or a designated country, as determined by the Governor.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!