Conflict/Dispute Resolution Sample Clauses

Conflict/Dispute Resolution. 1) Contractual Conflicts Step 1. As a first step, informal discussion between representatives of the School and the Sponsor regarding the particular issue in question. Step 2. Written notice by the Sponsor or the School outlining the nature of identified problem in performance or operation not being met or completed to the satisfaction of either party. Step 3. Meeting between the Governing Board of the School or their designee and the district staff or representative to discuss the issue(s) and any modification or amendments to the Charter terms and conditions. Step 4. The use of an alternative dispute resolution procedure found in
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conflict/Dispute Resolution. In extreme cases, data discrepancies may require some form of (as yet undefined) dispute resolution process to examine the available data and make a determination as to the proper registrant or sponsoring registrar. Such a process might be adapted from the registrar transfer dispute resolution process, but needs to be performed by ICANN or a party ICANN decides to contract. Given that the Transition-In process reconciles differences between a registry’s released escrow deposits and a zone file, and given the nature of the mandatory algorithm, there are at least four critical classes of dispute as described in the table below. There are several ways in which a registrant could be inadvertently changed (e.g., out of date or incomplete SRS).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Conflict/Dispute Resolution. Prior to a grievance being filed by the employee and/or the Union, the Informal Conflict/Dispute Resolution Process/Flowchart and the timelines contained therein, as specified in the Department’s Rules and Regulations, shall be followed. The timelines provided for in Step 1 below shall be suspended until the Informal Conflict/Dispute Resolution Process is complete. The Fire Chief shall make a written determination based on the Conflict/Dispute Resolution Process findings. If the decision is unacceptable, the employee, or the Union on behalf of an employee, may file a grievance within the timelines outlined in Step 1.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Conflict/Dispute Resolution. (1) Prior to a grievance being filed by the employee and/or the Union, the Informal Conflict/Dispute Resolution Process/Flowchart and the timelines contained therein, as specified in the Department’s Rules and Regulations, shall be followed. The timelines provided for in Step 1 below shall be suspended until the Informal Conflict/Dispute Resolution Process is complete. If the Fire Chief makes a written determination based on the Conflict/Dispute Resolution Process findings and a grievance is filed, the Step 1 Fire Chief meeting and response, as detailed below, shall be by- passed and moved directly to Step 2.
Sample 1Sample 2
Conflict/Dispute Resolution. All conflicts and/or disagreements shall be resolved in a timely fashion through peaceful means, reasonably, honorably, and in good faith, by the signatories of this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
Conflict/Dispute Resolution. ‌ In extreme cases, data discrepancies may require some form of (as yet undefined) dispute resolution process to examine the available data and make a determination as to the proper registrant or sponsoring registrar. Such a process might be adapted from the registrar transfer dispute resolution process, but needs to be performed by ICANN or a party ICANN decides to contract. Given that the Transition-In process reconciles differences between a registry’s released escrow deposits and a zone file, and given the nature of the mandatory algorithm, there are at least four critical classes of dispute as described in the table below. Alleged Change Path to resolution Registrant There are several ways in which a registrant could be inadvertently changed (out of date or incomplete SRS). As long as the registrar is correct, this doesn’t really require a dispute resolution process. The registrar will presumably have documentation and can figure out who is the registrant from data in in their own system. However, the current technical model will require that ICANN approve all registrar transfers (to avoid billable events occurring within the SRS). Alleged Change Path to resolution Domain Name Registration Status Registrants or their registrars may dispute the specific status of any given domain name registration; changes may occur after an escrow deposit is created that would not be reflected in a transitioned registry based on those escrow deposits. This is especially important if the change in status would result in the domain name not being included in the zone file. Any resolution of this issue will involve weighing and validating the veracity of technical evidence. Registrar where one of the involved registrars is a placeholder (reserved registrar) This scenario occurs when the Transition-In is forced to use an escrow deposit that’s older than the creation of the domain at the originating registry. Such discrepancies should already be identified as part of the Transition-In process. Any resolution of this issue will involve weighing and validating the veracity of technical evidence. Registrar where none of the involved registrars is a placeholder (reserved registrar) This scenario occurs when a domain transfer has occurred that was not reflected in the escrow deposit. There is no good way to predict that such discrepancies exist, but there should be a “statute of limitations” that limits how long this process needs to be available. Any resolution of this issue w...
Sample 1Sample 2
Conflict/Dispute Resolution. Subject to the applicable provisions of section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, as amended from time to time, all disagreements and disputes relating to or arising out of this Charter which the parties are unable to resolve informally, may be resolved according to the following dispute resolution process, unless otherwise directed or provided for in the aforementioned statute. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the Sponsor’s ability to immediately terminate this Charter in accordance with section 1002.33(8)(d), Florida Statutes. It is anticipated that a continuing policy of open communication between the Sponsor and the School will prevent the need for implementing a conflict/dispute resolution procedure. The following dispute resolution process, not otherwise pre-empted by section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, shall be equally applicable to both parties to this Charter in the event of a dispute. All disagreements and disputes relating to or arising out of this Charter which the parties are unable to resolve informally, may be resolved according to the following dispute resolution process: Step 1 -- The persons having responsibility for implementing this Charter for the grieving party will write to the other party to identify the problem, propose action to correct the problem and explain reasons for the proposed action.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Conflict/Dispute Resolution

  • I2 Dispute Resolution The Parties shall attempt in good faith to negotiate a settlement to any dispute between them arising out of or in connection with the Contract within twenty (20) Working Days of either Party notifying the other of the dispute and such efforts shall involve the escalation of the dispute to the finance director of the Contractor and the commercial director of the Authority.

  • Third Party Dispute Resolution The Consulting Firm shall (i) consider only the items that are then disputed by the parties, (ii) shall be bound by the terms of the Agreement and (iii) shall only make a determination of such disputed matters in favor of the proposal made by the Purchasers or the Sellers (as may be presented by each party to the Consulting Firm in writing, which shall be shared with the other party) and shall not make an independent proposal. The Consulting Firm shall prepare a written determination of any disputed matters and deliver the determination to the Purchasers and the Sellers within fifteen (15) Business Days after the date the Consulting Firm is engaged. Each party shall cooperate fully with the Consulting Firm, including by using reasonable best efforts to provide the information, data and work papers to the extent permitted by applicable Law, so as to enable the Consulting Firm to make a determination of the disputed items as quickly as practicable. The Corrective Action Plan shall be finalized in accordance with the Consulting Firm’s determination of the disputed matters.

  • Alternate Dispute Resolution In the event of any issue of controversy under this Agreement, the PARTIES may pursue Alternate Dispute Resolution procedures to voluntarily resolve those issues. These procedures may include, but are not limited to, conciliation, facilitation, mediation, and fact finding.

  • Governing Law; Dispute Resolution (a) This Limited Guarantee shall be interpreted, construed and governed by and in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York without regard to the conflicts of law principles thereof that would subject such matter to the Laws of another jurisdiction other than the State of New York. (b) Any disputes, actions and proceedings against any party or arising out of or in any way relating to this Limited Guarantee shall be submitted to the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (the “HKIAC”) and resolved in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of HKIAC in force at the relevant time (the “Rules”) and as may be amended by this Section 10(b). The place of arbitration shall be Hong Kong. The official language of the arbitration shall be English and the arbitration tribunal shall consist of three arbitrators (each, an “Arbitrator”). The claimant(s), irrespective of number, shall nominate jointly one Arbitrator; the respondent(s), irrespective of number, shall nominate jointly one Arbitrator; and a third Arbitrator will be nominated jointly by the first two Arbitrators and shall serve as chairman of the arbitration tribunal. In the event the claimant(s) or respondent(s) or the first two Arbitrators shall fail to nominate or agree on the joint nomination of an Arbitrator or the third Arbitrator within the time limits specified by the Rules, such Arbitrator shall be appointed promptly by the HKIAC. The arbitration tribunal shall have no authority to award punitive or other punitive-type damages. The award of the arbitration tribunal shall be final and binding upon the disputing parties. Any party to an award may apply to any court of competent jurisdiction for enforcement of such award and, for purposes of the enforcement of such award, the parties irrevocably and unconditionally submit to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction and waive any defenses to such enforcement based on lack of personal jurisdiction or inconvenient forum. (c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereto consent to and agree that in addition to any recourse to arbitration as set out in Section 10(b), any party may, to the extent permitted under the Laws of the jurisdiction where application is made, seek an interim injunction from a court or other authority with competent jurisdiction and, notwithstanding that this Agreement is governed by the Laws of the State of New York, a court or authority hearing an application for injunctive relief may apply the procedural Law of the jurisdiction where the court or other authority is located in determining whether to grant the interim injunction. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 10(c) is only applicable to the seeking of interim injunctions and does not restrict the application of Section 10(b) in any way.

  • Dispute Resolution All or any disputes arising out or touching upon or in relation to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including the interpretation and validity of the terms thereof and the respective rights and obligations of the Parties, shall be settled amicably by mutual discussion, failing which the same shall be settled through the adjudicating officer appointed under the Act.

  • Dispute Resolution; Arbitration This Agreement evidences a transaction involving interstate commerce. Any disputes arising from this Agreement shall be decided by binding arbitration which shall be conducted, at the request of any party, in New York, New York, before one arbitrator designated by the American Arbitration Association (the "AAA"), in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the AAA, and to the maximum extent applicable, the United States Arbitration Act (Title 9 of the United States Code). Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, any party may proceed to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain equitable relief at any time. An arbitrator shall have no authority to award punitive damages or other damages not measured by the prevailing party's actual damages. To the maximum extent practicable, an arbitration proceeding under this Agreement shall be concluded within 180 days of the filing of the dispute with the AAA. This arbitration clause shall survive any termination, amendment, or expiration of the Agreement and if any provision of this arbitration clause is found to be unenforceable, the remaining parts of the arbitration clause shall not be affected and shall remain fully enforceable.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution (a) Prior to the initiation of formal dispute resolution procedures (i.e., arbitration), the Parties shall first attempt to resolve their dispute at the senior manager level. If that level of dispute resolution is not successful, the Parties shall proceed informally, as follows: (i) Upon the written request of either Party, each Party shall appoint a designated representative who does not otherwise devote substantially full time to performance under this Agreement, whose task it will be to meet for the purpose of endeavoring to resolve such dispute. (ii) The designated representatives shall meet as often as the Parties reasonably deem necessary in order to gather and furnish to the other all information with respect to the matter in issue that the Parties believe to be appropriate and germane in connection with its resolution. The representatives shall discuss the problem and attempt to resolve the dispute without the necessity of any formal proceeding. (iii) During the course of discussion, all reasonable requests made by one Party to another for non-privileged non-confidential information reasonably related to this Agreement shall be honored so that each of the Parties may be fully advised of the other's position. (iv) The specific format for the discussions shall be left to the discretion of the designated representatives. (b) Prior to instituting formal proceedings, the Parties will first have their chief executive officers meet to discuss the dispute. This requirement shall not delay the institution of formal proceedings past any statute of limitations expiration or for more than fifteen (15) days. (c) Subject to Subsection (b), formal proceedings for the resolution of a dispute may not be commenced until the earlier of: (i) The designated representatives concluding in good faith that amicable resolution through continued negotiation of the matter does not appear likely; or (ii) Thirty (30) days after the initial written request to appoint a designated representative pursuant to Subsection (a), above, (this period shall be deemed to run notwithstanding any claim that the process described in this Section 11.2 was not followed or completed). (d) This Section 11.2 shall not be construed to prevent a Party from instituting, and a Party is authorized to institute, formal proceedings earlier to avoid the expiration of any applicable limitations period, or to preserve a superior position with respect to other creditors or as provided in Section 11.6(a).

  • Formal Dispute Resolution 10.6.1 If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute through the informal procedure described in Section 10.5, then either Party may invoke the formal Dispute Resolution procedures described in this Section 10.6. Unless agreed among all Parties, formal Dispute Resolution procedures, including arbitration or other procedures as appropriate, may be invoked not earlier than sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of the letter initiating Dispute Resolution under Section 10.3.

  • Initial Dispute Resolution If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Contract or its breach, the parties shall endeavor to settle the dispute first through direct discussions between the parties’ representatives who have the authority to settle the dispute. If the parties’ representatives are not able to promptly settle the dispute, they shall refer the dispute to the senior administrators of the parties who have the authority to settle the dispute, who shall meet within fourteen days thereafter. If the dispute is not settled by the senior administrators, the parties may submit the dispute to mediation in accordance with Paragraph 5.2.3.2.

  • Dispute Resolutions Parties agree to arbitration of dispute in Houston, Texas, USA.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!