Contextual background Sample Clauses

Contextual background. Accident and Emergency Departments (A&E), otherwise referred to as an Emergency Department (ED) are ‘consultant led 24 hour service with full resuscitation facilities and designated accommodation for the reception of accident and emergency patients (Health and Social Care Information Centre 2015a). They specialise in the acute care of patients who present unexpectedly to hospital and manage patients with a variety of medical conditions and traumatic injuries, of which approximately 25% are children between 0- 16 years of age (Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) 2012, International Federation of Emergency Medicine (IFEM) 2012). The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) refers to a ‘child’ as “any individual from birth through infancy (including neonates), childhood and adolescence, recognising the particular needs of specific ages, particularly the transition period to adulthood” (RCN 2003a, p.7). Consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) (UNICEF 1989, p.2), the Intercollegiate Committee for Standards for Children in Emergency Care Settings (RCPCH 2012) and International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM 2012) describe a child as any person under the age of eighteen years. Three million children attended A&E Departments during 2006/7 (Institute for Innovation and Improvement 2008). More recently, attendances to emergency care facilities (A&E Departments, Walk-in-Centres (WIC), Minor Injury Units (MIU)) in England have seen an increase in attendances from 18.3 million (2012/3) to 18.5 million (2013/4). Of these, children less than 4 years of age account for 9.8% (1.8 million) attendances, while children less than 10 years of
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Contextual background. 2.1. The case of the amaranth agri-food system in Mexico City Amaranth (by its scientific name Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.) is an ancestral crop of Mesoamerican origin, whose first archaeobotanical registers can be located just over 4 thousand years ago (Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx, 2019). Although little information exists regarding global amaranth production, it is possible to find extensive literature on the exceeding food properties of amaranth and its possibilities to tackle complex problems, such as malnutrition (Xxxxxxx et al., 2010; Xxxxxxxx et al., 2014). In Mexico amaranth can be found in at least 18 of the 32 federal entities; however, by 2018, most production came from the state of Puebla, followed by Tlaxcala, State of Mexico, and Mexico City, with a maximum of 5,125 tons in the case of Puebla, and a minimum of 152 tons for Mexico City (SAGARPA, 2020) therefore mayor production is concentrated in central Mexico. Mexico City, one of the most densely populated cities in the country, concentrates the largest number of amaranth agro-industrial productive units, especially in the town hall of Xochimilco. In this town, those units have made the production, transformation, and marketing of amaranth its main economic activity, which means that they invested efforts into rescuing the cultural, agronomic, and nutritional value of the seed, while adding up value into their food products. These amaranth agro- industrial units require an enormous amount of amaranth seed as it is a primary raw material. Therefore, Mexico City has become an anchor for the amaranth agri-food system in the country´s central region. The town hall of Xochimilco in Mexico City is considered as "[the] traditional [region] of amaranth production" (Xxxxxxx et al., 2010: 64) where the tradition, the tangible and intangible knowledge, and the know-how around amaranth- activities in this region have been inherited from parents and grandparents (Xxxxx and Xxxxxxx, 2011). For Xxxxxxx and collaborators (Xxxxxxx et al., 2010), the amaranth producers of Xochimilco have managed to preserve the cultivation of amaranth, and its genetic diversity, due to a vision of collective identity and common roots. The innovation around amaranth crop in the region has also taken place through a series of (organizational) innovations aimed at the rescue of natural areas and landscapes (Xxxxxxxxx, 2010) and environmental restoration. Product and process innovations can be materialized through the generation of n...
Contextual background. In the BPM context, NFPs are constraints that have to be imposed to ensure quality and meet other business process requirements (Xxxxxxxxx and Xxx, 2008). However, NFPs are not yet widely accepted and often receive less attention than the functional properties in the BPM approaches. BPMN, for instance, in its official version, does not deal with NFPs although there are some limited proposals in the literature. Taking into account some similarities, BPM approaches should be given the same conduct as that given to the functional and non-functional requirements in the Software Engineering approaches (Xxxxxxxxxxx, 2010). The functional performance of IT services depends on a number of NFPs, such as: availability, response time and accuracy. The QoS assurance provided by IT is one of the most important factors for business success, as well as improving competitiveness (Khaluf, Xxxxx and Xxxxxx, 2011). SLAs can formalize and ensure that these operating and quality constraints are overcome. SLAs are thus able to assess whether the service provided complies with the terms agreed between parties (Theilmann et al., 2010). With regard to the specific BPM/SOA context, the most commonly languages employed to formalize SLAs are WS-Agreement and WS-Policy, both based on XML and recommended by W3C. SLAs address the QoS attributes and levels, and are linked to the web services that provide an executable process that is implemented to meet the functional requirements of a process model (Caseau, 2005). The SLAs specified in one of these two languages have their own structures and can, for example, be used to define goals, metrics, fines and bonuses. A BLA, in turn, can be considered to be equivalent to a SLA at a business level. SLA features are, hence, found in a BLA, and include: agreement validity, fines and bonuses (Bratanis, Xxxxxxxx and Simons, 2010). Thus, a BLA, linked to a sub-process, can be hierarchically mapped to a set of SLAs. During the process modelling, a BLA is regarded as a “father” agreement that is related to a set of activities in the process model. During the process implementation, this BLA can derive a set of SLAs that are linked to the respective services. These services, in turn, were derived from the business process model to perform its set of activities. This top-down derivation, as illustrated in Figure 1, defines a set of SLAs that, if all are met, allows the BLA goal to be achieved in an induced way (Xxxx, Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxxxx, 2011). BLA B...
Contextual background. The recent emphasis on compassion in the NHS is influenced by both political and professional drivers (DOH, 2008, DOH, 2009; DOH, 2012a, Xxxxxxx, 2013). Both Xxxx Xxxxx’x review of the NHS and the NHS Constitution place compassion at the heart of care delivery and perceive compassion as an aspect of high quality care (DOH, 2008, DOH, 2009). In a drive to promote the delivery of compassionate care in the NHS, a number of nursing initiatives have been implemented to redress the poor standards of care associated with the perceived lack of compassion in nursing (RCN, 2010; DOH, 2012). This section discusses the political context for making compassion a priority in the NHS and for the professional drivers to promote compassionate care.

Related to Contextual background

  • Background and Context 1.1 Objectives of this Agreement The purpose of this Agreement is to define, in the context of the resource inputs provided, the targets by which the performance of Forensic Science Ireland (FSI) will be measured in 2021. The ongoing supports that the Department of Justice will provide to FSI in this regard, and the mechanisms for monitoring and appraising performance, form part of the overall governance arrangements between the two parties and as such are set out in the separate but complementary Oversight Agreement 2020-22.

  • General Background In accordance with the Amendment provision in Section 11 of the Registrar, Transfer Agency and Paying Agency Agreement between State Street Bank and Trust Company (the "Bank") and Royce Value Trust, Inc. (the "Fund") dated August 21, 1996 (the "Agreement"), the parties desire to amend the Agreement.

  • Background Screening VENDOR shall comply with all requirements of Sections 1012.32 and 1012.465, Florida Statutes, and all of its personnel who (1) are to be permitted access to school grounds when students are present, (2) will have direct contact with students, or (3) have access or control of school funds, will successfully complete the background screening required by the referenced statutes and meet the standards established by the statutes. This background screening will be conducted by SBBC in advance of VENDOR or its personnel providing any services under the conditions described in the previous sentence. VENDOR shall bear the cost of acquiring the background screening required by Section 1012.32, Florida Statutes, and any fee imposed by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to maintain the fingerprints provided with respect to VENDOR and its personnel. The parties agree that the failure of VENDOR to perform any of the duties described in this section shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling SBBC to terminate immediately with no further responsibilities or duties to perform under this Agreement. VENDOR agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SBBC, its officers and employees from any liability in the form of physical or mental injury, death or property damage resulting from VENDOR’s failure to comply with the requirements of this section or with Sections 1012.32 and 1012.465, Florida Statutes.

  • Intellectual Property Rights in Construction Documents, Drawings, and Models The drawings, Specifications and other documents prepared by the Design Professional pursuant to this Contract (including, without limitation, the Construction Documents), are the property of the Owner, whether or not the Project for which they are made commences or completes construction. Neither the Contractor nor any Subcontractor or material or equipment supplier shall own or claim a copyright in such drawings, Specifications, and other similar or related documents; Owner shall retain all common law, statutory, and other intellectual property rights with respect thereto. The Contractor must deliver remaining copies of such documents to the Owner upon request or upon completion of the Work, except that the Contractor may keep one copy of such documents for its files. The Contractor shall only use such drawings, Specifications and other documents for this Project. Neither the Contractor nor any Subcontractor or material or equipment supplier may use such drawings, Specifications, and other documents on other projects without the specific written consent of the Owner. All models are the property of the Owner.

  • GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SECTOR SPECIFIC ALLOWANCES, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant: Where the company does work which falls under the following headings, the company agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Background 1.1. The “Work” is the research article, review article, letter, clinical trial study, report, article, or other copyright work, as identified in the Copyright Letter and further detailed in Schedule 1: Details of the Work (including such form of the copyright work submitted to Xxxxxxx Science for publication pursuant to clause 4, below), but excluding (except where context otherwise requires) any diagrams, figures or illustration specifically identified to Xxxxxxx Science pursuant to clause 3.2, below.

  • Project Background 6.1.1. Brief description of Contracting Agency’s project background and/or situation leading to this Project

  • BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION The Federal-aid Highway Program (FAHP) is a federally-assisted program of State-selected projects. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the State Departments of Transportation have long worked as partners to deliver the FAHP in accordance with Federal requirements. In enacting 23 U.S.C. 106(c), as amended, Congress recognized the need to give the States more authority to carry out project responsibilities traditionally handled by FHWA. Congress also recognized the importance of a risk-based approach to FHWA oversight of the FAHP, establishing requirements in 23 U.S.C. 106(g). This Stewardship and Oversight (S&O) Agreement sets forth the agreement between the FHWA and the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) on the roles and responsibilities of the FHWA and the State DOT with respect to Title 23 project approvals and related responsibilities, and FAHP oversight activities. The scope of FHWA responsibilities, and the legal authority for State DOT assumption of FHWA responsibilities, developed over time. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation delegated responsibility to the Administrator of the FHWA for the FAHP under Title 23 of the United States Code, and associated laws. (49 CFR 1.84 and 1.85) The following legislation further outlines FHWA’s responsibilities: • Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991; • Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) of 1998; • Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) of 2005; and • Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) of 2012 (P.L. 112-141). The FHWA may not assign or delegate its decision-making authority to a State Department of Transportation unless authorized by law. Xxxxxxx 000 xx Xxxxx 00, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Code (Section 106), authorizes the State to assume specific project approvals. For projects that receive funding under Title 23, U.S.C., and are on the National Highway System (NHS) including projects on the Interstate System, the State may assume the responsibilities of the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation under Title 23 for design, plans, specifications, estimates, contract awards, and inspections with respect to the projects unless the Secretary determines that the assumption is not appropriate. (23 U.S.C. 106(c)(1)) For projects under Title 23, U.S.C. that are not on the NHS, the State shall assume the responsibilities for design, plans, specifications, estimates, contract awards, and inspections unless the State determines that such assumption is not appropriate. (23 U.S.C. 106(c)(2)) For all other project activities which do not fall within the specific project approvals listed in Section 106 or are not otherwise authorized by law, the FHWA may authorize a State DOT to perform work needed to reach the FHWA decision point, or to implement FHWA’s decision. However such decisions themselves are reserved to FHWA. The authority given to the State DOT under Section 106(c)(1) and (2) is limited to specific project approvals listed herein. Nothing listed herein is intended to include assumption of FHWA’s decision-making authority regarding Title 23, U.S.C. eligibility or Federal-aid participation determinations. The FHWA always must make the final eligibility and participation decisions for the Federal-aid Highway Program. Section 106(c)(3) requires FHWA and the State DOT to enter into an agreement relating to the extent to which the State DOT assumes project responsibilities. This Stewardship and Oversight Agreement (S&O Agreement), includes information on specific project approvals and related responsibilities, and provides the requirements for FHWA oversight of the FAHP (Oversight Program), as required by 23 U.S.C. 106(g).

  • Contract Database Metadata Elements Title: Whitesville Central School District and Whitesville Central School Educational Support Staff Association (2003) Employer Name: Whitesville Central School District Union: Whitesville Central School Educational Support Staff Association Local: Effective Date: 07/01/2003 Expiration Date: 06/30/2006 PERB ID Number: 10699 Unit Size: Number of Pages: 23 For additional research information and assistance, please visit the Research page of the Catherwood website - xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/library/research/ For additional information on the ILR School - xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/ AGREEMENT BETWEEN WHITESVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT STAFF ASSOCIATION AND THE WHITESVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT JULY 1, 2003 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE TITLE PAGE Preamble 1 I Recognition 1 II Collective Bargaining U n i t 1 III Dues/Agency Fee Ckoffand Payroll Deduction 1 IV Rights of Employees 2 V Rights of Employer ------------- 2 VI Personnel F i l e 2 VII Employee Definitions 3 VIII Permanent Status/Seniority 4 IX Wages 5 X Overtime 7 XI Vacation 7 XII Holidays 8 XIII Sick Leave and Leavesof A b s e n c e 8 XIV Conference, Workshops,Required Courses 10 XV Meal Allowance and M i l e a g e 11 XVI Retirement 11 XVII Insurance 12 XVIII Cafeteria P l a n 14 .XIX Uniform Allowance------------------ 14 XX Hours of W o r k 14 XXI Transfers/Promotions 15 XXII Job Descriptions 15 XXIII Grievance Procedure 15 XIV Copies of the Contract 18 XV Zipper C x x x x x 18 XXVI Legislative Clause 18 XXVII Duration 19 SIGNATURES 19 APPENDIX A Grievance F o r m 20 APPENDIX B Dues Authorization F o r m 21

  • Background Data The Disclosing Party's Background Data, if any, will be identified in a separate technical document.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.