DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS Sample Clauses

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The XXXX will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The XXXX will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the XXXX to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the XXXX may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The XXXX will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The XXXX will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The XXXX will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The XXXX will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The XXXX will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The XXXX will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (21)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. A. The CM/GC will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/ equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Project Schedule. B. The CM/GC will recommend, with CITY approval, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the CM/GC to construct the Project. C. The CM/GC will routinely conduct constructability and biddability reviews of the Drawings and Specifications as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work of Subcontractors and Suppliers.
Sample 1Sample 2
DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The XXXX shall periodically evaluate the availability of labor, materials/equipment, and building systems; cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP proposals and/or the project schedule. 2.4.2 The XXXX shall identify, in conjunction with the project team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that are required to provide the necessary information for the XXXX to construct the project. After completion of design phase services, the XXXX may provide additional investigation to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the construction documents. The XXXX may be responsible for the time and cost required to obtain such additional investigations, except if otherwise provided by specific additional services. 2.4.3 The XXXX shall meet with the project team as required to review designs during their development. The XXXX shall be familiar with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The XXXX shall proactively advise the project team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and labor and material availability. The XXXX shall advise the project team of proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as any concerns regarding coordination of the drawings and specifications. The XXXX shall proactively recommend cost effective alternatives throughout the project. 2.4.4 The XXXX shall routinely conduct constructability and bid ability reviews of the drawings and specifications as necessary to satisfy the needs of the project team. The reviews shall attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the construction documents, especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of work of subcontractors and suppliers.
Sample 1Sample 2
DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.5.1 The XXXX will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.5.2 The XXXX will recommend, obtain Owner approval, and conduct any additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the XXXX to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the XXXX may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.5.3 The XXXX will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The XXXX will proactively advise, justify, and implement recommendations on factors related to construction costs and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The XXXX will furthermore advise, justify, and implement proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The XXXX will recommend and implement cost effective alternatives, as approved by the Owner.
Sample 1
DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The CM@R will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact GMP Proposals and/or the Project Schedule and provide this information in a written report to the PM/CM. 2.4.2 The CM@R will identify, in writing and in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that are required to provide the necessary information for the CM@R to construct the Project. After completion of pre-construction services, the CM@R may provide additional investigations to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. The CM@R will be responsible for the time and cost required to obtain such additional investigations, except as otherwise provided by specific Additional Services. 2.4.3 The CM@R will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The CM@R will thoroughly familiarize itself with the evolving documents through schematic design (30%), design development (60%), construction documents (95%), and final documents (100%). The CM@R will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The CM@R will also advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The CM@R will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The CM@R will conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Drawings and Specifications at the 30%, 60%, and 95% document submittals. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work of Subcontractors and Suppliers.
Sample 1
DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. A. The CM/GC will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Project Schedule. B. The CM/GC will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Drawings and Specifications as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work of Subcontractors and Suppliers.
Sample 1

Related to DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS

  • Design Documents Prepare and submit the following documents to the DAS - Records Management Office with a copy of the transmittal letter submitted to the respective Project Manager: 1. City/State Approved Drawings (1) Original set 2. Bid Set Drawings (1) Set BOND PAPER (marked as “ORIGINAL”) (1) Set electronic file (DWG & PDF) 3. Project Manual (1) Set hard copy & Detail Manual (1) Set electronic file

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • REVIEW OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 4.2.1 The Contractor shall carefully study and compare the Contract Documents and shall immediately report in writing to the Architect and the State any error, inconsistency or omission he may discover. The Contractor shall not be liable to the State or the Architect for any damage resulting from any such errors, inconsistencies or omissions in the Contract Documents. The

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!