Design Review Process. 9 Developer shall not be relieved of its responsibility for the satisfactory completion of the Work in 10 accordance with the Contract Documents by ADOT’s participation in design reviews. ADOT may 11 require resubmittal of any Design Documents and/or Construction Documents, as it deems 12 appropriate. ADOT will have the right to refuse and reject any Submittal that does not comply 13 with the Contract Documents, including QA/QC requirements. If any Submittal is rejected, 14 Developer shall notify all recipients to remove all copies from circulation. Developer shall 15 redistribute the replacement Submittal to ADOT and other appropriate Governmental Entities, 16 as authorized by ADOT.
Design Review Process. A. Design Review Components of the Initial Rehabilitation of the Undertaking may be developed on different schedules and may be reviewed individually. The Design Review Process does not preclude these component designs from advancing individually. The development of the Preliminary and Final Design for the Undertaking shall be advanced by GSA and Xxxxx as follows, prior to the commencement of construction:
Design Review Process. From time to time, as identified in the applicable Schedule, the parties will have design review meetings. ADC will be actively involved in the critical design review for each Product to be developed hereunder.
Design Review Process. (i) Recognizing the importance of the visual impact of the WWTP, and respecting the Development Permit requirements of the Township’s Official Community Plan, the CRD agrees to involve the City of Victoria, along with the Township, in a collaborative design review process involving the three (3) shortlisted proponent teams relating to the exterior design and finish of the WWTP, with the intent that such discussions will result in concurrence among the CRD, the Township’s staff and the City of Victoria. It is intended to hold the collaborative design review process during October and November 2013, in advance of the final submissions from the proponent teams.
(ii) As the design review process will take place during the competitive RFP process, participants including those from the Township shall sign a confidentiality agreement prior to participating in the design review process. The parties acknowledge that such agreement cannot be applicable to the exercise of the Township’s statutory powers in relation to the required development permit(s).
(iii) The CRD recognizes that the Project Lands are designated a development permit area in accordance with the Local Government Act and therefore the final decision on design and permit issuance rests with the Township’s Council (subject however to appeals, judicial review and the authority of the Minister of Environment under the Environmental Management Act). The CRD will bring forward the final design as part of its development permit application for consideration by Township Council, but is free to seek input from Council in advance.
Design Review Process. 1. AFRH shall ensure that the design review process described in Appendix G is followed for the review of federally- or privately-funded projects proposed by an Action Agent on federally-owned land at AFRH-W. A graphic flowchart of this process is shown in Appendix H
2. The design review process shall be initiated upon execution of the appropriate SOP, as defined in Chapter 6 of the HPP.
Design Review Process. A. Design Review The development of the Center Building Preliminary and Final Designs for the Undertaking shall be advanced by GSA as follows, prior to the commencement of construction:
1. Preliminary Design
Design Review Process. The provisions set forth in Exhibit F, Section XVI shall apply with respect to the design review process for Development of the Real Property. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the Town’s normal review process will be followed until the Xxxxxxx PUD Commercial Design Review Guidelines are approved by Town Staff, as further described in Exhibit F.
Design Review Process. A. RSD is currently developing a design for the new Education Specification and Performance Standards compliant school on the Xxxxxxxx School site, within the Esplanade Ridge National Register Historic District.
Design Review Process. TCLA shall engage and coordinate with County on the design of the Proposed Project, and the design shall be subject to County’s review and approval as set forth in the Project Agreements.
Design Review Process. 5.1 Developer shall complete the design of the Project in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan and this Article 5. Developer shall design the publicly accessible structures and residential component to, at a minimum, (a) comply with the City’s Mandatory Green Building Practices, as set forth in Section 151.50, et seq., of the City Code of Ordinances, and (b) achieve the standards for a Florida Green certification from the Florida Green Building Coalition, or an equivalent or greater certification from the U.S. Green Building Council, or any other substantially equal or better green-building certification approved by the City (“Green Certification”). Developer shall provide the City with copies of all final records and reports relative to the Green Certification. Any changes to the Conceptual Site Plan that constitute a Material Design Change are subject to City’s prior review and approval in its proprietary capacity under this Agreement, which shall be rendered in accordance with the Deemed Approval Process and this Article 5. Any changes to the Project (and corresponding changes to the Conceptual Site Plan) that do not constitute a Material Design Change or that are required to achieve the Green Certification shall not require City’s approval under this Article 5. The Developer shall, at its sole cost, make its consultants (architects, engineers, etc.) available for regular design and construction meetings for coordination with City staff throughout the design process as is customarily required for the design of Public Facilities, at all stages.
5.2 Developer shall submit a complete application package for the Minimum Project Entitlements to City’s Technical Advisory Committee (“TAC”) for review and approval, which package shall include the Conceptual Site Plan and all other plans and specifications required to be submitted to any Governmental Authority with jurisdiction (“Master Development Plan”). TAC review and approval of the Master Development Plan shall be rendered in accordance with the City Code and all other applicable County, State and Federal laws. XXX has the right to request changes to the Master Development Plan provided that such changes do not prohibit the development of the Project. Developer shall be required to make any changes requested by TAC as set forth above. If such changes are requested, Developer shall revise the Master Development Plan to address the same and resubmit to TAC for its approval. If further changes to the resub...
