Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The District Board approves the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action set forth in current school policy, and subject to the conditions below and otherwise in this Contract:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. DSST agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. DSST also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act and the provisions of the No Child Left Xxxxxx Xxx, 00 X.X.X. § 0000(x)(0). District shall provide six months’ notice to DSST when a change in approved software is implemented by the District unless otherwise required by law.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in Section F of the Application and corrective action contained in Section F of the Application. The Board approves the School’s proposal for the use of multiple tools for assessment of student performance which shall include but not be limited to standardized achievement tests as described in Section F of the application. The School agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. The School agrees to conduct standardized testing using forms and schedules prescribed by the School District. The School also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act, and the requirements of S.B. 163 as finalized in August 2010. The School shall pay to the School District the pro-rata costs associated with all such tests and assessments such as, but not limited to, the cost of test booklets and scoring and tabulating results.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board approves the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action contained on page 9 of the Application, subject to the conditions below and otherwise set forth in this Contract. The School agrees to coordinate testing with the School District’s statistical needs.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts TCA's methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in the Plan for Evaluating Student Performance Section of the Application as amended by this Contract and subject to the conditions stated herein:
Sample 1
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The 208 Board of Education approves Liberty Common's methods for evaluating pupil performance and 209 procedures for corrective action as contained in the Application. The Board of Education 210 approves Liberty Common's proposal for the use of multiple tools for an assessment of student 211 performance, which shall include but not be limited to standardized achievement tests as described 212 in the Application, or as may be amended by the Liberty Common Board of Directors from time 213 to time. Liberty Common agrees to implement any testing and reporting requirements deemed 214 necessary by the School District to meet the School District's obligations under C.R.S. § 22-7- 215 401 et seq., upon being reasonably notified of said requirements. Should the School District 216 require testing beyond that required by the state, the School District will pay for these costs. 217 218
Sample 1
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board approves the Charter School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action set forth on revised Attachment H-2 which sets forth the criteria for pupil performance, as amended below, and subject to the conditions below and otherwise in this contract:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts Horizons’ methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in the Plan for Evaluating Student Performance Section of the original Application. The Board of Education accepts Horizons’ proposal for the use of multiple tools for assessment of student performance that shall include, but not be limited to, standardized achievement tests. Horizons agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and the reporting of test data with the School District’s statistical reporting needs and to implement any testing requirements and assessments that may be required to meet the School District’s obligations under the provisions of Colorado law including, without limitation, , the Accountability Act, and the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6311(b)(3). Horizons shall pay to the School District the pro-rata costs associated with all such tests and assessments such as, but not limited to, the cost of test booklets and scoring and tabulating results.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. Academy of Advanced Learning agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. Academy of Advanced Learning also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act and the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6311 (b)(3).
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action

  • PROCEDURES AND/OR CRITERIA FOR COURSE ARTICULATION a. Complete the ROP Careers with Children course at Freedom High School with a grade of “B” or better.

  • Contractor Requirements and Procedures For Business Participation Opportunities For NYS Certified Minority- and Women-Owned Business Enterprises and Equal Employment Opportunities for Minority Group Members and Women

  • CERTIFICATION PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FIREARM AND AMMUNITION INDUSTRIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has at least ten (10) full-time employees; (c) this contract has a value of at least $100,000 that is paid wholly or partly from public funds; (d) the contract is not excepted under Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.003 of SB 19 (87th leg.); and (e) governmental entity has determined that company is not a sole-source provider or governmental entity has not received any bids from a company that is able to provide this written verification, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 19 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary parent company, or affiliate of these entities or associations, that exists to make a profit, does not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate during the term of this contract against a firearm entity or firearm trade association. For purposes of this contract, “discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” shall mean, with respect to the entity or association, to: “(1) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; (2) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; or (3) terminate an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19. “Discrimination against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” does not include: “(1) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories; and (2) a company’s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency, or for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity’s or association’s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Function of Joint Health and Safety Committee All incidents involving aggression or violence shall be brought to the attention of the Joint Health and Safety Committee. The Employer agrees that the Joint Health and Safety Committee shall concern itself with all matters relating to violence to staff.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.