Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The District Board approves the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action set forth in current school policy, and subject to the conditions below and otherwise in this Contract:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. Academy of Advanced Learning agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. Academy of Advanced Learning also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act and the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6311 (b)(3).
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board approves the Charter School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action set forth on revised Attachment H-2 which sets forth the criteria for pupil performance, as amended below, and subject to the conditions below and otherwise in this contract:
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board approves the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance and procedures for corrective action contained on page 9 of the Application, subject to the conditions below and otherwise set forth in this Contract. The School agrees to coordinate testing with the School District’s statistical needs.
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts TCA's methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in the Plan for Evaluating Student Performance Section of the Application as amended by this Contract and subject to the conditions stated herein: 6.1. TCA agrees to use the assessment instruments currently in use by the School District; the need for other or additional testing will be reassessed on an annual basis. 6.2. TCA agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and the reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs and to implement any testing requirements that may be required to meet the School District's obligations under the provisions of C.R.S. §§ 00-00-000 et seq. 6.3. TCA will buy back assessment services from the District and provide all information requested by Learning Services as required by state law in a timely manner and in the form required for reporting to the Board. TCA will have access to all TCA information reported to the Board for use as TCA desires. The District will provide a list of services provided by the Director of Assessment and staff and a justification for the amount of purchased services above and beyond CMAS testing materials. TCA shall be billed quarterly on an hourly rate for assessment services at a rate that reflects the estimated hourly rate of the District's Director of Assessment and actual hourly rate of TOSAs and classified office staff.
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts Horizons’ methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in the Plan for Evaluating Student Performance Section of the original Application. The Board of Education accepts Horizons’ proposal for the use of multiple tools for assessment of student performance that shall include, but not be limited to, standardized achievement tests. Horizons agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and the reporting of test data with the School District’s statistical reporting needs and to implement any testing requirements and assessments that may be required to meet the School District’s obligations under the provisions of Colorado law including, without limitation, , the Accountability Act, and the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6311(b)(3). Horizons shall pay to the School District the pro-rata costs associated with all such tests and assessments such as, but not limited to, the cost of test booklets and scoring and tabulating results.
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The 208 Board of Education approves Liberty Common's methods for evaluating pupil performance and 209 procedures for corrective action as contained in the Application. The Board of Education 210 approves Liberty Common's proposal for the use of multiple tools for an assessment of student 211 performance, which shall include but not be limited to standardized achievement tests as described 212 in the Application, or as may be amended by the Liberty Common Board of Directors from time 213 to time. Liberty Common agrees to implement any testing and reporting requirements deemed 214 necessary by the School District to meet the School District's obligations under C.R.S. § 22-7- 215 401 et seq., upon being reasonably notified of said requirements. Should the School District 216 require testing beyond that required by the state, the School District will pay for these costs. 217 218
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. The Board accepts the School’s methods for evaluating pupil performance as contained in Section F of the Application and corrective action contained in Section F of the Application. The Board approves the School’s proposal for the use of multiple tools for assessment of student performance which shall include but not be limited to standardized achievement tests as described in Section F of the application. The School agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. The School agrees to conduct standardized testing using forms and schedules prescribed by the School District. The School also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act, and the requirements of S.B. 163 as finalized in August 2010. The School shall pay to the School District the pro-rata costs associated with all such tests and assessments such as, but not limited to, the cost of test booklets and scoring and tabulating results.
Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action. DSST agrees to cooperate with School District administrators to coordinate testing and reporting of test data with the School District's statistical reporting needs. DSST also agrees to implement any testing requirements or assessments necessary to meet the School District's obligations under Colorado law including, without limitation, the Educational Accountability Act and the Educational Accreditation Act and the provisions of the No Child Left Xxxxxx Xxx, 00 X.X.X. § 0000(x)(0). District shall provide six monthsnotice to DSST when a change in approved software is implemented by the District unless otherwise required by law.

Related to Evaluation of Pupil Performance and Procedures for Corrective Action

  • Implementation of Corrective Action Plan After the Corrective Action Plan is finalized, the Purchasers shall use reasonable best efforts to implement the finalized Corrective Action Plan on the timeline set forth therein and provide periodic reports (as provided for therein) to the Sellers on the status of their implementation of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Review and Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will have no obligation (i) to determine whether a Delinquency Trigger has occurred, (ii) to determine whether the required percentage of Noteholders has voted to direct a Review, (iii) to determine which Receivables are subject to a Review, (iv) to obtain or confirm the validity of the Review Materials, (v) to obtain missing or insufficient Review Materials (except to the extent set forth in Section 3.04), or (vi) to take any action or cause any other party to take any action under any of the Basic Documents to enforce any remedies for breaches of any Eligible Representations. The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the Tests provided in Exhibit A and will have no obligation to perform additional testing procedures on any ARR Receivables or to consider any additional information provided by any party. The Asset Representations Reviewer will have no obligation to provide reporting or information in addition to that described in Section 3.07. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may review and report on additional information that it determines in good faith to be material to its performance under this ARR Agreement and may re-perform a Review with respect to an ARR Receivable as contemplated by Section 3.09. The Issuing Entity expressly agrees that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not advising the Issuing Entity or any Noteholder or any investor or future investor concerning the suitability of the Notes or any investment strategy. The Issuing Entity expressly acknowledges and agrees that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not an expert in accounting, tax, regulatory, or legal matters, and that the Asset Representations Reviewer is not providing legal advice as to any matter.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions 10.14.1 Contractor agrees to comply fully with and be bound by all of the provisions of Chapter 12T, “City Contractor/Subcontractor Consideration of Criminal History in Hiring and Employment Decisions,” of the San Francisco Administrative Code (“Chapter 12T”), including the remedies provided, and implementing regulations, as may be amended from time to time. The provisions of Chapter 12T are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The text of the Chapter 12T is available on the web at xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/olse/fco. Contractor is required to comply with all of the applicable provisions of 12T, irrespective of the listing of obligations in this Section. Capitalized terms used in this Section and not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in Chapter 12T. 10.14.2 The requirements of Chapter 12T shall only apply to a Contractor’s or Subcontractor’s operations to the extent those operations are in furtherance of the performance of this Agreement, shall apply only to applicants and employees who would be or are performing work in furtherance of this Agreement, and shall apply when the physical location of the employment or prospective employment of an individual is wholly or substantially within the City of San Francisco. Chapter 12T shall not apply when the application in a particular context would conflict with federal or state law or with a requirement of a government agency implementing federal or state law.

  • CERTIFICATION PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST FIREARM AND AMMUNITION INDUSTRIES (Texas law as of September 1, 2021) By submitting a proposal to this Solicitation, you certify that you agree, when it is applicable, to the following required by Texas law as of September 1, 2021: If (a) company is not a sole proprietorship; (b) company has at least ten (10) full-time employees; (c) this contract has a value of at least $100,000 that is paid wholly or partly from public funds; (d) the contract is not excepted under Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.003 of SB 19 (87th leg.); and (e) governmental entity has determined that company is not a sole-source provider or governmental entity has not received any bids from a company that is able to provide this written verification, the following certification shall apply; otherwise, this certification is not required. Pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code Ch. 2274 of SB 19 (87th session), the company hereby certifies and verifies that the company, or association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, or limited liability company, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary parent company, or affiliate of these entities or associations, that exists to make a profit, does not have a practice, policy, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association and will not discriminate during the term of this contract against a firearm entity or firearm trade association. For purposes of this contract, “discriminate against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” shall mean, with respect to the entity or association, to: “ (1) refuse to engage in the trade of any goods or services with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; (2) refrain from continuing an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association; or (3) terminate an existing business relationship with the entity or association based solely on its status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19. “Discrimination against a firearm entity or firearm trade association” does not include: “ (1) the established policies of a merchant, retail seller, or platform that restrict or prohibit the listing or selling of ammunition, firearms, or firearm accessories; and (2) a company’s refusal to engage in the trade of any goods or services, decision to refrain from continuing an existing business relationship, or decision to terminate an existing business relationship to comply with federal, state, or local law, policy, or regulations or a directive by a regulatory agency, or for any traditional business reason that is specific to the customer or potential customer and not based solely on an entity’s or association’s status as a firearm entity or firearm trade association.” See Tex. Gov’t Code § 2274.001(3) of SB 19.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • GRIEVANCE AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES A. A grievance is a dispute, claim, or complaint arising under this Agreement, filed by either an authorized representative of or an employee in the Bargaining Unit, or the County, involving the interpretation or application of this Agreement. All discipline shall be for just cause. B. Grievances will be processed in the following manner and strictly in accordance with the following stated time limits: Step 1. The aggrieved employee shall be accorded fifteen (15) working days from the occurrence of the action or event or when the employee has knowledge or should have had knowledge of the action or the event giving rise to the complaint to seek resolution on an informal basis. The Employee must discuss his alleged grievance with the Airport Fire Chief and the Fire Rescue Division Director. If informal resolution is not accomplished, the employee, if a Union member, must present the proposed grievance in writing to a Union officer on or before the fifteenth (15th) working day for consideration by the Union Grievance committee. If, in the Committee's opinion, no reasonable grievance exists, no further action may be taken. Step 2. If the Committee wishes to pursue the member's complaint, a written grievance shall be presented to the Director of the Fire Rescue Division or his designee within twenty (20) working days from the occurrence of the action or event giving rise to the grievance or from the date on which the employee reasonably should have had knowledge of that occurrence. A written grievance must be presented on a grievance form provided by the County in Appendix A. Upon receipt of a formal grievance or a class action submitted by the Union, the Fire Rescue Division Director or his designee shall investigate the facts and conduct a meeting within five (5) working days with the aggrieved employee and any other persons possessing knowledge considered critical by the Director. The aggrieved employee may be accompanied at this meeting by a local Union representative. The Fire Rescue Division Director or his designee shall notify the grievant of his decision no later than five (5) working days following the date of the meeting. Step 3. If the grievance is not resolved at the second step, the aggrieved employee shall present the written grievance within five (5) working days of the Step 2 decision to the Department Head. The Department Head or his designee shall investigate the facts and may conduct a hearing within five

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Function of Joint Health and Safety Committee All incidents involving aggression or violence shall be brought to the attention of the Joint Health and Safety Committee. The Employer agrees that the Joint Health and Safety Committee shall concern itself with all matters relating to violence to staff.

  • Mitigation and Corrective Action Business Associate shall mitigate, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect that is known to it of an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI, even if the impermissible use or disclosure does not constitute a Breach. Business Associate shall draft and carry out a plan of corrective action to address any incident of impermissible use or disclosure of PHI. If requested by Covered Entity, Business Associate shall make its mitigation and corrective action plans available to Covered Entity. Business Associate shall require a Subcontractor to agree to these same terms and conditions.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!