Evaluation of Responses. The WCCA will make the awards based on the quote being: a) compliant to the stated or implied specifications; b) references and background information submitted c) the lowest evaluated cost to the WCCA over projected useful life; and d) administratively compliant, including all required bonds, insurance, established quality of work and general reputation financial responsibility, relevant experience, compliance with federal laws and all relevant District of Columbia laws, including EEOC hiring guidelines and requirements under the American with Disability Act and related criteria.
Evaluation of Responses. C.1 The WCCA will make the award based on the contractor’s response which is:
Evaluation of Responses. 8.1 DECC will select the applicant that provides the most economically advantageous bid to be its preferred supplier.
Evaluation of Responses. The Department shall evaluate the Bidders’ Phase I submissions described in this solicitation, to identify responsive and responsible Bidders who will be invited to participate in the Online Reverse Auction. Responses that do not meet all requirements of the solicitation or fail to provide all required information, documents, or materials may be rejected as non-responsive. Bidders whose responses, past performance, or current performance do not reflect the capability, integrity, or reliability to fully and in good faith perform the requirements of a Contract may be rejected as non- responsible.
Evaluation of Responses. A. Rejection of Responses - The Miami Parking Authority may reject a response for any of the following reasons:
Evaluation of Responses. All properly submitted RFQ Packages shall be evaluated by an Evaluation Committee. Each Evaluation Committee Team Member will receive a set of all of the RFQ Packages submitted, a copy of the RFQ Document with all issued Addenda, an Evaluator’s Score Sheet, and Evaluator’s Score Narrative Sheet. The Team shall then evaluate each RFQ Package according to the criteria described herein. Each Evaluation Team Member shall evaluate the RFQ Packages individually, with no communication, coordination, or influence from any other Evaluation Team Member, or any other individual. Scores for each Respondent shall be recorded on the Evaluator’s Score Sheet. A public Evaluation Meeting will be held by the SJC Purchasing Department to record the scores from each Evaluation Committee Member, and rank the firms’ scores highest to lowest. The County desires to avoid the expense to all parties of unnecessary presentations; however, the County may elect to conduct oral interviews or presentations from one or more of the respondents in order to make a final determination of the top rankings. If the County elects to conduct oral interviews or presentations, selected firms will be notified. All such presentations or interviews shall be open to the public. County Staff may consider any evidence available regarding financial, technical, other qualifications and abilities of a respondent, including past performance (experience) with the County prior to recommending approval of award to the St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners. The St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, waive minor formalities or award to / negotiate with the firms whose proposals best serve the interests of the County.
Evaluation of Responses. The Operating Committee has the final authority and discretion to evaluate the responses from each Prospective ASP that submits a response to the RFP (ASP Proposal), noting that the following criteria (which are not set out in a particular order) are relevant but not binding to the appointment:
Evaluation of Responses
