Evidence and Artifacts. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete this evaluation. Said collection will be accomplished openly and, wherever possible, jointly. A teacher may, but shall not be required to, submit artifacts for completion of the evaluation.
Evidence and Artifacts a. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete this evaluation.
b. The teacher may provide additional evidence and artifacts to aid in the assessment of the teachers’ professional performance against the instructional rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom
c. This collection of evidence will be accomplished openly and whenever possible, jointly.
d. Up to five (5) work days after the final post observation conference, a teacher has the right to submit artifacts and evidence, however it is not required.
e. All evidence, measures, artifacts and observations used in developing the final evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted.
f. The evidence provided by the teacher will be incorporated on the negotiated form and it will be a factor in determining the final evaluation score
Evidence and Artifacts. 1. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete the evaluation. Said collection will be accomplished openly and, wherever possible, jointly. A teacher is expected to submit artifacts for completion of the evaluation.
2. The District commits to documenting evidence of performance available via observation to the greatest extent possible to lessen the time required by teachers to compile additional artifacts. If, after completing the minimum required observations, both the teacher and evaluator agree on the score for a criterion, no additional evidence is required to be collected for that criterion. It is the intent of the parties that every effort will be made to provide and collect ample evidence of proficiency. It is the nature and quality of the evidence, not the amount that determines its rating. The evaluator may request evidence in areas not yet consistent with a proficient rating but may not require a specific amount of evidence or number of artifacts.
3. The teacher may provide additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated into the eVAL Observation Report Form prior to the post-observation conference and be used to determine the final evaluation score.
Evidence and Artifacts. The evaluator will collect and share artifacts and evidence necessary to complete the evaluation. The teacher may provide additional artifacts and evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. Said collection will be accomplished openly and, wherever possible, jointly. The evidence provided by the teacher shall be incorporated on the negotiated form prior to the post-observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score. A teacher may, but shall not be required to submit artifacts for completion of the evaluation if not appropriate to his/her teaching assignment. The District commits to documenting the evidence of performance via observations and conversations to the greatest extent possible so as to lessen the time required by teachers to compile evidence readily available via observation. The evaluator may not require a specific number of pieces of evidence or artifacts.
Evidence and Artifacts. Both the educator and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete this evaluation. The educator may provide additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the educator’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the educator may be discussed with the evaluator and may be used to determine the final evaluation score. Evidence includes representative examples, conversations, artifacts or observable practices of the educator’s ability and skill in relation to the instructional framework rubric gathered from the normal course of employment. Artifacts are a type of evidence and include any products generated, developed, or used by a certificated educator. If a second- or third-year Provisional educator received a summative score of Proficient or Distinguished in the previous year, then he or she will focus evidence collection for Domain 4 components on the components rated as Basic or below in the previous year. If all Domain 4 components were rated as Proficient or above, then the educator and evaluator will collaborate to choose one (1) Domain 4 component to focus on and collect evidence. The evaluator will carry over remaining component scores.
Evidence and Artifacts. 1. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete this evaluation.
2. Student and parent perception data shall not be solicited by the evaluator for inclusion as evidence in the evaluation.
3. The teacher may provide additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher may be discussed during the post-observation conference, and be used to determine the final evaluation score.
4. Evaluations shall be based solely on the work performance of each employee.
5. Evaluators shall not include evidence of content knowledge and pedagogy from classes or subjects outside the employee’s certification and endorsements.
6. All observations shall be conducted openly. No video or audio recordings shall be made of a formal or informal observation without the prior knowledge and consent of the teacher.
7. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will be based on a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year.
8. Evidence or artifacts which are not shared with an employee within the timelines in this Agreement may not be used in the evaluation.
Evidence and Artifacts. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete this evaluation. The teacher may provide additional evidence to aid in the assessment of the teacher’s professional performance against the instructional framework rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom. The evidence provided by the teacher may be discussed with the evaluator and may be used to determine the final evaluation score. Evidence includes representative examples, artifacts or observable practices of the teacher’s ability and skill in relation to the instructional framework rubric gathered from the normal course of employment. Artifacts are a type of evidence and include any products generated, developed or used by a certificated teacher.
Evidence and Artifacts a. Both the teacher and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete this evaluation.
b. The teacher may provide additional evidence and artifacts to aid in the assessment of the teachers’ professional performance against the instructional rubric, especially for those criteria not observed in the classroom
c. This collection of evidence will be accomplished openly and whenever possible, jointly.
d. Up to five (5) work days after the final post observation conference, a teacher has the right to submit artifacts and evidence, however it is not required.
e. All evidence, measures, artifacts and observations used in developing the final summative evaluation score must be a product of the school year in which the evaluation is conducted.
f. The evidence provided by the teacher will be incorporated on the negotiated form and it will be a factor in determining the final summative evaluation score
5. Record-Keeping All Physical documents, including instructional rubric, artifacts, teacher’s written comments, if applicable, and forms, shall be moved to the teacher’s personnel file at the end of the school year.
Evidence and Artifacts. 1. Both the employee and the evaluator will contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete the evaluation. Said collection will be accomplished openly and, wherever possible, jointly. An employee is expected to submit artifacts for completion of the evaluation.
2. The District commits to documenting the evidence of performance via observations and conversations to the greatest extent possible so as to lessen the time required by employees to compile evidence readily available via observation. The evaluator may not require a specific number of pieces of evidence or artifacts.
Evidence and Artifacts. 1. Both the teacher and the evaluator may contribute to evidence collection necessary to complete this evaluation. The use of the District’s on-line evaluation tool by teachers is optional beyond the establishment of an account, viewing of observation reports, and viewing year-end summary reports.
2. Student and parent perception data shall not be solicited or included as evidence in the evaluation.
3. Evidence of a teacher’s performance may be collected in a non-classroom setting where the teacher is leading or actively participating as a member of the team. These non classroom activities may include but are not limited to: o IEP meetings; o Leadership team meetings; o PLC meetings; o Staff meetings; o SIP visit; o School assembly; o Parent-teacher conference; o Back to school night/curriculum night/open house; o PTA meetings; o District-sponsored professional development; o CTE project meetings; o CMAC meetings; o Board presentations
4. Evaluations shall be based solely on the work performance of each employee. Except for student growth goals and student growth documentation, employees shall not be expected or required to submit any written documents (including responses to prompts, reflections, notes, self-assessments, or other documents) not otherwise used in the course of their typical instruction, unless there is insufficient evidence to achieve a proficient rating. Employees may utilize written prompts or personal notes if they wish, but these optional documents may not be required by their evaluator.
5. Evaluators shall not include evidence of content knowledge and pedagogy from classes or subjects outside the employee’s certification and endorsements.
6. All observations shall be conducted openly. No video or audio recordings shall be made of a formal or informal observation without the prior knowledge and written consent of the teacher.
7. Evidence used in developing a summative score shall be from the time period covered by the evaluation.
8. The final summative score, including the student growth score, must be determined by an analysis of evidence. This analysis will be based on a holistic assessment of the teacher’s performance over the course of the year.
