HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. The Parties agree that every effort should be made to deliver hu manitarian assistance to all Liberians, particularly children, who are malnourished and suffering from related diseases. Convoys of humanitarian assistance should travel to all areas of Liberia through the most direct routes, under inspection to ensure com pliance with the sanctions and embargo provisions of this Agreement. SECTION F
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. 4.11. Humanitarian Assistance to the Armenia will be carried out by the Swiss Party in form of goods, services, experts and financial contribution.
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. Article 42 Humanitarian Aid shall be distributed by the Secretariat of State for Rehabilitation and Social Integration, assisted by the Humanitarian Agencies.
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. Federated States of Micronesia Program. In recognition of the special development needs of the Federated States of Micronesia, the Government of the United States shall make available to the Govern- ment of the Federated States of Micronesia, on its request and to be deducted from the grant amount made available under subsection (a) of this section and subsection (a) of section 261, a Humanitarian Assistance – Federated States of Micronesia (‘‘HAFSM’’) Program with emphasis on health, education, and infrastructure (including transportation), projects. The terms and conditions of the HAFSM shall be set forth in the Agreement Regarding the Military Use and Operating Rights of the Government of the United States in the Federated States of Micronesia Concluded Pursuant to Sections 321 and 323 of the Compact of Free Association, as Amended.
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. Keeping the National Society in the receiving country informed and engaged in the decision-making at every stage of the response is mandatory. A National Society willing to provide a medical ERU should only accept a deployment order that is a result of a fully transparent process of negotiation involving the receiving country’s National Red Cross Red Crescent Society. A deployment order with terms of reference issued by the IFRC guarantees that a consultative process has taken place. A deployment order or request from a non-Movement organisation such as a United Nations agency is unreceivable to a Red Cross Red Crescent National Society. On-site registration and coordination IFRC’s goal for the on-site coordination is to ensure consistent and effective communication with the health authorities and any EMT coordination cell established, keeping the National Red Cross Red Crescent Society in the centre of operational decision making and planning. The RDC/EMTCC/OSOCC1 at the Port of Entry will be informed about arriving Red Cross Red Crescent medical ERUs by the IFRC, or the National Society focal point mandated to coordinate the health response in the Red Cross Red Crescent operation. Good coordination of Red Cross Red Crescent ERUs in the field is a collaborative effort of the National Society in the country, the national health authorities, the humanitarian coordination functions specific to the emergency in question, and the operational leadership of the Red Cross Red Crescent operation where several Movement partners may be represented. For specific reporting lines and communication in the emergency operation, the Team Leader of the medical ERU should adhere to the Terms of Reference issued for the deployment by the IFRC Secretariat. Coordination of medical ERUs is typically a function allocated to an IFRC Health Coordinator, often working closely together with a Health Manager of the National Society. Information about the provider, classification of services, operational parameters and team composition will be recorded by the IFRC operations manager or health coordinator in the country. This information is shared with the National Society, the health authorities of the country/EMTCC, Movement coordination, the RDC/OSOCC and the Health Cluster. Individual patient referral forms, periodic reporting, disease surveillance data and consolidated lists of referrals are examples of reporting that is provided directly from the medical ERU Team Leader to the Nat...
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. Memorandum of understanding for the con- tribution of civilian personnel to the United Nations Transitional Administration for Eastern Slavonia, Baranja and Western Sirmium, with annexes. Signed at New York March 26, 1996; entered into force March 26, 1996; effective March 14, 1996. TIAS ; 1918 UNTS 413.
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. The Commission has so far provided €1.4 billion humanitarian assistance for life-saving emergency response, food, water, sanitation, hygiene and shelter to millions of Syrians inside Syria and in neighbouring countries. Inside Syria, thanks to lifesaving aid provided by the Commission, some 2 million people have gained access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene items, 850 000 people have received food, 1 million people have received non-food items and shelter, and 350 000 children have been covered by child protection programmes. The EU’s humanitarian aid is impartial and independent and goes to people in need regardless of ethnic or religious considerations. The EU’s humanitarian aid is channelled through the United Nations, International Organisations, and international NGO partners.
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. The parties shall continue to keep humanitarian corridors open and support all humanitarian assistance to affected areas and communities in Jonglei State. Detention procedures No specific mention. Media and communication Media roles
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. The parties shall continue to open corridors for humanitarian support to affected areas and communities in Gbudue and Maridi States. Detention procedures No specific mention. Media and communication Media roles Page 3, V. Hostile propaganda The parties agree to refrain from all hostile propaganda or any hateful expression aimed at each other. They agree that no communication regarding this cessation of hostilities Agreement should be made to the public without mutual agreement and the agreement of the mediation team ofthis peace negotiation. Citizenship No specific mention. Justice sector reform Criminal justice and emergency law No specific mention. State of emergency provisions No specific mention. Judiciary and courts No specific mention. Prisons and detention No specific mention. Traditional Laws No specific mention. Socio-economic reconstruction Development or socio- economic reconstruction Humanitarian assistance Page 4, VII. Humanitarian Assistance The parties shall continue to open corridors for humanitarian support to affected areas and communities in Gbudue and Maridi States. National economic plan No specific mention. Natural resources No specific mention. International funds No specific mention. Business No specific mention. Taxation No specific mention. Banks No specific mention. Land, property and environment Land reform/rights No specific mention. Pastoralist/nomadism rights No specific mention. Cultural heritage No specific mention. Environment No specific mention. Water or riparian rights or access No specific mention. Security sector Security Guarantees No specific mention. Ceasefire Ceasefire provision Page 3, NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree to a cessation ofhostilities as follows:
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. The secretariat for the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) and many other UN organizations are engaged in disaster risk reduction (DRR). Japan continues to work with these organizations to promote DRR. Amid the growing importance of DRR in the international community, Japan hosted the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction in March 2015 in Sendai, which was hit by the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011. The Conference adopted a successor framework of the Hyogo Framework for Action*, an international guideline on disaster risk reduction from 2005 to 2015. Through the formulation of the successor framework, Japan has taken the lead in mainstreaming "DRR" – the idea of introducing the perspective of DRR into every development policy. As a nation that has experienced many natural disasters, Japan has also shared with the world its experiences in DRR and the lessons learned from them, as well as DRR technologies and systems that can contribute to realizing more resilient societies. * Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) This framework was adopted at the Second UN World Conference on Disaster Reduction in 2005, held in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan. The HFA provides a set of guidelines on DRR for a 10-year period, ending in 2015. With a view to making countries and communities more resilient, the HFA outlines five priorities for action: