Identification of Contingent Facilities. The ISO shall identify Contingent Facilities through the Class Year Interconnection Facilities Study under Attachment S to the ISO OATT, and specify such Contingent Facilities in the Interconnection Agreement. The method for identifying Contingent Facilities shall be sufficiently transparent as to why the ISO identifies Contingent Facilities and how they relate to the Class Year Project. Consistent with the analyses performed in the Class Year Study under Section 25.6 of Attachment S, the ISO shall evaluate the impact on short circuit, thermal, voltage, or stability of unbuilt Attachment Facilities and System Upgrade Facilities and/or System Deliverability Upgrades associated with Class Year Projects. The ISO shall identify those unbuilt facilities in the Annual Transmission Baseline Assessment and the Annual Transmission Reliability Assessment against which the Class Year Project is evaluated as Contingent Facilities if the impact on short circuit, thermal, voltage, or stability of the unbuilt facilities exceeds the de minimis standards set forth in Sections 25.6.2.6.1.1 through 25.6.2.6.1.4 of Attachment S to the ISO OATT. A Developer may also request the ISO to provide the estimated costs and estimated in-service completion time of each identified Contingent Facility when this information is readily available and not commercially sensitive.
Identification of Contingent Facilities. IPA will post a method for identifying the Contingent Facilities to be provided to Interconnection Customer at the conclusion of the System Impact Study and included in Interconnection Customer’s GIA. The method will be sufficiently transparent to determine why a specific Contingent Facility was identified and how it relates to the Interconnection Request. IPA will also provide, upon request of Interconnection Customer, the estimated Interconnection Facility and/or Network Upgrade costs and estimated in-service completion time of each identified Contingent Facility when this information is readily available and not commercially sensitive.
Identification of Contingent Facilities. The ISO shall identify Contingent Facilities through the Cluster Study, and specify such Contingent Facilities in the Standard Interconnection Agreement. The method for identifying Contingent Facilities shall be sufficiently transparent as to why the ISO identifies Contingent Facilities and how they relate to the Cluster Study Project. Consistent with the analyses performed in the Cluster Study under Section 40.12, the ISO shall evaluate the impact on short circuit, thermal, voltage, or stability of unbuilt Attachment Facilities, Distribution Upgrades, System Upgrade Facilities, and/or System Deliverability Upgrades associated with Cluster Study Projects. The ISO shall identify those unbuilt facilities in the Cluster Baseline Assessment and the Cluster Project Assessment against which the Cluster Study Project is evaluated as Contingent Facilities if the impact on short circuit, thermal, voltage, or stability of the unbuilt facilities exceeds the de minimis standards set forth in Sections 40.12.2.5.1.1 through 40.12.2.5.1.4. An Interconnection Customer may also request the ISO to provide the estimated costs and estimated in-service completion time of each identified Contingent Facility when this information is readily available and not commercially sensitive.
Identification of Contingent Facilities. Transmission Provider will provide a list of Contingent Facilities to the Interconnection Customer upon completion of either the Preliminary or Definitive Interconnection System Impact Study. The Contingent Facilities will be identified in a Preliminary or Definitive Interconnection System Impact Study Report and in any subsequent Re-Studies as well as in the Interconnection Facilities Study Report and in the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement. The Transmission Provider will provide, upon the Interconnection Customer’s request, the estimated unbuilt Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrade costs and estimated in-service completion schedules for any identified Contingent Facilities when such information is readily available and not commercially sensitive.
Identification of Contingent Facilities. 3.8.1 In General Transmission Provider’s method for identifying the Contingent Facilities to be provided to Interconnection Customer at the conclusion of the System Impact Study and included in Interconnection Customer’s LGIA is set forth below. The method permits the parties to determine why a specific Contingent Facility was identified and how it relates to the Interconnection Request.
Identification of Contingent Facilities. Transmission Provider shall post in this section a method for identifying the Contingent Facilities to be provided to Interconnection Customer at the conclusion of the System Impact Study and included in Interconnection Customer’s GIA. The method shall be sufficiently transparent to determine why a specific Contingent Facility was identified and how it relates to the interconnection request. Transmission Provider shall also provide, upon request of the Interconnection Customer, the estimated interconnection facility and/or network upgrade costs and estimated in-service completion time of each identified Contingent Facility when this information is readily available and not commercially sensitive.
Identification of Contingent Facilities. Transmission Provider shall post in this section a method for identifying the Contingent Facilities to be provided to Interconnection Customer at the conclusion of either the Serial Interconnection System Impact Study or the Definitive Interconnection System Impact Study, and as included in Interconnection Customer’s Large Generator Interconnection Agreement. The method shall be sufficiently transparent to determine why a specific Contingent Facility was identified and how it relates to the Interconnection Request. Transmission Provider shall also provide, upon request of the Interconnection Customer, the estimated Interconnection Facility and/or Network Upgrade costs and estimated in-service completion time of each identified Contingent Facility when this information is readily available and not commercially sensitive.
Identification of Contingent Facilities. As part of the Interconnection System Impact Study, Transmission Provider shall identify Contingent Facilities using the following methods:
Identification of Contingent Facilities. Transmission Provider shall identify the Contingent Facilities to be provided to Interconnection Customer in the System Impact Study by reviewing unbuilt Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrades associated with an Interconnection Customer with a higher queue priority or a Transmission Provider’s transmission expansion component or a transmission expansion component of a third-party transmission provider upon which the Interconnection Customer’s cost, timing and study findings are dependent; and, if delayed or not built, could cause a need for interconnection restudies of the Interconnection Request or reassessment of the unbuilt Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrades. Transmission Provider shall include the list of Contingent Facilities in the System Impact Study, Interconnection Facilities Study, if applicable, and Standard Generator Interconnection Agreement, including why a specific Contingent Facility was identified and how it relates to the Interconnection Request. Transmission Provider shall also provide to the Interconnection Customer, upon request, the estimated Interconnection Facilities and/or Network Upgrade estimated costs and estimated in- service completion time of each identified Contingent Facility when this information is readily available and not commercially sensitive.
Identification of Contingent Facilities
