Intensity. From the absorption spectra in Figs. 1 and 2, qualitative differences between O2−O2 and O2−N2 collision-induced absorp- tion become apparent. The O2−O2 contributions are typically more intense, significantly broader in frequency, and decay less rapidly respectively. These profiles are compared to the results of the full calculations in Fig. 3, using realistic parameters a = 7a0 and = 3a −1. The analytical model reproduces the typical translational profiles, supporting the length-scale argument presented above.
Intensity the strength of the stressor itself to harm the species. The following are used to describe intensity: "Low” - minor reductions in range or vital rages [survival and reproductive capacity]; "Moderate” - reductions in range or vital rates; or "High” - severe reductions in vital rates. Population Exposure – how much of a PYTH population is exposed to a stressor in space and time. The following are used to describe exposure: "Insignificant” - level of exposure negligible; "Small” - <10% of population exposed; "Moderate” - 11-30% of population exposed; "Significant” - 31-60% of population exposed; and "Very Significant” - >60% of population exposed. Species Response - the change in the species' reproductive capacity or survival due to being exposed to a stressor. The following are used to describe response: "Basic Need Inhibited” - capacity to meet basic needs of feed/breed/shelter altered, possibly reducing growth or vital rates; "Confirmed” mortality or identifiable reduction in individual growth or vital rates; or "Significant” mortality or reduction in individual growth or vital rates. Overall Threat Level - the integration of the scope, immediacy, and intensity of the stressor with the exposure and response of the species measured at the population or species level. The following are used to describe the overall threat level: “Low” - no action needed at this time; "Moderate” - action is needed; "High” - immediate action is needed; or "Severe” - immediate action is essential for survival of population. Landowners and Partners – “DOD” = Department of Defense (Fort Huachuca); “USFS” =
Intensity. The intensity of each AE is to be assessed by the Investigator according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 5.0 (see xxxxx://xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_R eference_5x7.pdf). If the AE is not included in the NCI CTCAE, then the Investigator is to determine the intensity of the AE according to the following criteria: drug. work activities. activities. Life-Threatening (Grade 4): AE that is potentially life-threatening.1
Intensity. Goes after the goal with passion; is results oriented, and gets the job done. Ethical Behavior: Does what is right regardless of temptations and pressures to do otherwise; upholds the stakeholders’ trust; Is responsible and caring. Influence: Affects successful outcomes for the effort through the use of leadership, collaboration, and a keen understanding of the effort, its goals, and the interests of all parties. Engaged; collaborative; strategic, situational awareness; inspirational; energizing-empowering; team orientation; and change agent. Commitment: Successfully builds relationships with and promotes involvement of diverse groups; considers the needs of diverse stakeholders when developing actions related to service; works closely with diverse groups to identify and develop and the strategic objectives of the effort; and is committed to public service. Interpersonal Skills: Xxxxxxxxx and uses versatile communication styles and approaches; Resiliency: Is adaptable; takes action; leads by example; exhibits tenacity. This person is ready, flexible, self-reliant, and has a reputation for finding opportunities in difficult situations. Craftsmanship: Takes ownership of work done and results accomplished; takes pride in delivering quality services to stakeholders; seeks out opportunities to develop new and creative solutions; imagines possibilities; defines a vision, and works to bring vision into reality. Innovative; imaginative; inventive; pride-in-work; accountability; self-development; and self-starter. Salary: $20 – $35 hourly + 15% benefits 1040 hrs annually $23,920 - $41,860 Annually This is an at-will position that reports directly to the merger Facilitator and Executive Committee.
Intensity. Impact diagram Strengths Weaknesses Great starting point All included, convincing Addresses problems in an integrated way Useful for planners Learning tool Enables understanding of complexity Dynamic simulation – forecasting Enables understanding of potential events Better system understanding Highlights synergies / conflicts between measures Shows causality Important to know relationships – it helps to talk together with the right stakeholders Prioritise some measures according to connectedness Useful only at initial phase Need to quantify interdependencies Need qualified researchers to imagine scenarios of hazards / events, and appropriate tools Complicated (depends) Requires stakeholders to learn a new way of thinking, difficult Needs to integrate stakeholders in the model building Very sensitive It was remarked that these approaches represent four stages of an urban resilience analysis, each feeding in to the other, targeting distinct audiences and stages. Participants also commented that implementation of the results is always difficult than the analysis itself, and needs to be embedded thoroughly in the city’s daily urban planning routines. In addition to implementation it is also challenging to obtain public understanding and adoption of the measures, which requires concerted action and communication.
Intensity. Infection intensity within the brachial cavity of subyearling Chinook salmon from Lookout Point Reservoir increased through the year with significantly greater intensity in the fall (Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks, P<0.001) (Figure 3-3). This was consistent with results from previous years in other reservoirs. Intensity continued to increase for fish that remain in reservoirs an additional year. Yearlings in Lookout Point and Cougar reservoirs had significantly greater infection intensity than subyearlings (Xxxx-Xxxxxxx rank sum test, P<0.001) (Figure 3-4). 25 20 Copepods in brachial cavity 15 5 0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Figure 3-3. Number of copepods in the brachial cavity of infected subyearling Chinook salmon by month in Lookout Point Reservoir, 2014. Solid lines denote medians, red dashed lines denote means, the box represents 25th-75th percentiles, whiskers are the 10th -90th percentile and circles are outliers. Areas sharing the same letter are not significantly different (Xxxx’x multiple comparison test; P<0.05) 10 6 4 Copepods in brachial cavity 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 As with prevalence, infection intensity in the fall was greater for reservoir subyearlings compared to streams (Xxxx-Xxxxxxx rank sum test, P<0.001) (Figure 3-5). The majority of infected stream-rearing subyearlings (83%) had just one copepod, generally attached to a fin, while most reservoir-rearing fish had multiple parasites (median=3) usually attached within the brachial cavity. Reservoir (n=1,344) Stream (n=18) 100 Percent of infected Chinook 80 60 40 20 Fall Creek Reservoir in previous years exhibited much greater infection intensity than other reservoirs, but that was not evident in 2014 (Figure 3-6). Median intensity within the brachial cavity for fish in Fall Creek (median=4, range: 2-10) and Detroit (median=5, range: 1-21) were not significantly different, but were greater than Cougar (median=3, range: 1-21) and Lookout Point (median=3, range: 1-22) reservoirs (Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks, P<0.001, with Xxxx’x multiple comparison test). Cougar Detroit LOP Fall Cr 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 Proportion of Chinook 10 15 20 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 5 10 15 20 Number of copepods in brachial cavity
Intensity. Intensity shall not exceed that depicted on the overall MPD.
Intensity. Intensity • Match! analytical software analysis showed a consistent and significant match with only one mineral for all data sets – Calcite and Aragonite 2Theta
Intensity. Intensity • Performed manual comparisons to calcium‐based minerals predicted by Visual Minteq speciation software in concurrent studies
Intensity. Moderate intensity aerobic exercise, designed to suit a range of fitness levels is recommended for most patients undergoing exercise training (1,22,52,56,57) • During the initial conditioning phase, patients should be working at 40% – 60% VO2 max and may progress up to 70% in later stages once 20 minutes of continuous CV work has been achieved. In practical terms this can be denoted by: • 60 – 75% HR max, progressing to 80% • 40 – 60% HRR, progressing to 70% • RPEs of:
