Issues and Challenges Sample Clauses

Issues and Challenges. Mobilizing technical assistance providers Preparing focused provincial TA plans Supporting health investment plans, CSR plans, and health financing Improving service providers’ performance
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Issues and Challenges. RSV class of vessels is not available in Bangladesh. Bangladesh has foreign going vessels of higher technical and xxxxxxx standards which are not cost-effective for the coastal voyage between the two countries.15 The coastal shipping pact currently permits vessels of up to 6,000 gross tonnage (GT) to ply due to size restrictions mandated by the RSV rules. But often it is observed that using these small low capacity boats is not cost-effective for longer stretches such as from Chennai to Chittagong. This Agreement is limited to bilateral trade between India and Bangladesh and cannot be used for India to India trade (transit trade), i.e. to connect mainland India to North East India. A separate agreement was signed on the use of Chittagong and Mongla Ports for the movement of goods to and from India by using Chittagong/Mongla to Agartala, Chittagong/ Mongla to Dawki, and Chittagong/Mongla to Sutarkandi routes.16 This enabled the movement of cargo to the North East through coastal shipping up to Chittagong and thereafter by road/inland waterways/rail. The SOP of this agreement was finalised in 2019. The first trial container ship from Kolkata to Agartala and Karimganj through Chittagong port shows that this route drastically cuts short the distance between Kolkata and Agartala via Assam from about 1600km to just about 450 km.17,18 Due to inadequate demand and lack of return cargo from Bangladesh, vessel service is available between Kolkata/Haldia and Chittagong and but not between Kolkata/ Haldia and Mongla. Shipping lines are also reluctant to provide vessel service till Pangaon due to a lack of return cargo. The roughness of the sea in the Bay of Bengal during the monsoon season from April- October becomes a risk for plying coastal vessels (RSV IV) due to their small sizes. The present trade pattern is largely in favour of India and cargo ships and containers mostly return empty from Bangladesh to India. As a result, freight cost increases and often become non-viable for low-value cargoes. For example, for each container customer pays $700 from Kolkata to Pangaon port apart from other ancillary costs as they are charged for both ways haulage. High fuel cost - as governments apply excise duty on fuel cost which is about M50 per litre which often makes coastal shipping less cost- effective. The predictability of the delivery time of the cargo in Bangladesh is also a major issue due to congestion at the Chittagong port. Chittagong port is the prime maritime ga...
Sample 1
Issues and Challenges. As in many other surveying districts, one of the main concerns of the fuelwood users in Matara district (Enterprise using fuelwood) is the rise of price due to limited and decreasing supply and ever increasing demand. In Matara district, competition is fierce for using most species such as Rubber and Ginisapu for timber and fuelwood. A number of companies use Rubber and other species for timber related production. In this context, traditional users of fuelwood face difficulties in maintaining a stable supply of fuelwood. On the other hand during the last decades many Rubber lands have been converted to Tea and palm oil plantation resulting reduction in Rubber cover. It is witnessed that owners/manager of business enterprises use fuelwood in efficient manner recognizing the fact that it is becoming a scarce resource. Some of the Tea factories revealed their plans in transforming some of the boilers to use saw-dust instead of fuelwood. Yet, none of the enterprises have a plan to make the fuelwood supply sustainable in future. In most cases, it is found that firms are not ready pay more for fuelwood due to enormous economic hardship faced at present.
Sample 1
Issues and Challenges. A summary of the issues and challenges pertaining to community use of school facilities identified by the November 2005 Consultation Group was presented to consultation meeting participants. Participants were provided the opportunity to ask questions of clarity, to share their perspectives and to identify additional issues and challenges faced by users, schools and EPSB. Participants then rated how significant a challenge or barrier each issue theme is for schools and community users in achieving improved access to school facilities by community groups. No new issue themes were identified during the March 2006 consultation meetings. While themes were clarified and there were minor differences in how each group rated the significance of each theme as a challenge, both November 2005 and March 2006 consultation participants identified the same set of issues. The following are the issue themes and a summary of related challenges developed by consultation group participants in both November and March. There were a number of specific examples offered by participants that are not directly quoted in the report. Based on March 2006 consultation group participants’ rankings, they are in descending order of significance as a challenge to be addressed. A comparison to the order determined by November consultation group participants follows.
Sample 1
Issues and Challenges. March 2006 Consultation Group participants were asked to identify the issues and challenges faced by community user groups and local schools in meeting needs and expectations in terms of access to sports fields adjacent to Edmonton Public schools. Participants also rated how significant a challenge or barrier each issue is in facilitating access to sports fields. The following is a summary of the primary issues and challenges identified by meeting participants. Issues/challenges are presented in descending order of significance.
Sample 1

Related to Issues and Challenges

  • Challenges The Experts may be challenged by either Party if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to any of their impartiality or independence. In such circumstances the challenge shall be brought by written notice to the ICC copied to the other Party within fourteen (14) calendar days of the appointment of the relevant Expert or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenging Party becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge. Unless the challenged Expert withdraws. or whichever of the Parties that has not brought the challenge agrees to the challenge, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenge, the ICC shall decide the challenge and, if appropriate, shall appoint a replacement Expert in accordance with the criteria set out herein.

  • No Challenges In no event shall any Secured Party take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, extent, enforceability, or priority of the Collateral Agent’s Liens hereunder or under any other Security Document with respect to any of the Collateral, or that would have the effect of invalidating any such Lien or support any Person who takes any such action. Each of the Secured Parties agrees that it will not take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, enforceability or secured status of any other Secured Party’s claims against any Obligor (other than any such claim resulting from a breach of this Agreement by a Secured Party, or any challenge, contest or dispute alleging arithmetical error in the determination of a claim), or that would have the effect of invalidating any such claim, or support any Person who takes any such action.

  • Challenge If Executive violates or challenges the enforceability of any provisions of the Restrictive Covenants or this Release, no further payments, rights or benefits under Section 5 of the Agreement will be due to Executive (except where such provision would be prohibited by applicable law, rule or regulation).

  • Legal Actions A Receiver may bring, prosecute, enforce, defend and abandon any action, suit or proceedings in relation to any Security Asset which he thinks fit.

  • Legal Action There shall not have been instituted or threatened any legal proceeding relating to, or seeking to prohibit or otherwise challenge the consummation of, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or to obtain substantial damages with respect thereto.

  • Legal Actions or Proceedings No legal action or proceeding shall have been instituted or threatened seeking to restrain, prohibit, invalidate or otherwise affect the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

  • Infringement Proceedings Each Party agrees to promptly notify the other Party of any unauthorized use of the other Party's Marks of which it has actual knowledge. Each Party will have the sole right and discretion to bring proceedings alleging infringement of its Marks or unfair competition related thereto; provided, however, that each Party agrees to provide the other Party with its reasonable cooperation and assistance with respect to any such infringement proceedings.

  • Pending Litigation or Other Proceedings There is no pending or, to the best of the Backup Servicer’s Knowledge, threatened action, suit, proceeding or investigation before any court, administrative agency, arbitrator or governmental body against or affecting the Backup Servicer which, if decided adversely, would materially and adversely affect (i) the condition (financial or otherwise), business or operations of the Backup Servicer, (ii) the ability of the Backup Servicer to perform its obligations under, or the validity or enforceability of this Indenture or any other documents or transactions contemplated under this Indenture, (iii) any property or title of any Obligor to any property or (iv) the Indenture Trustee’s ability to foreclose or otherwise enforce the Liens of the Timeshare Loans.

  • Complaints and Disputes 28.1. If the Client wishes to report a complaint, he must send an email to the Company with the completed “Complaints Form” found on the Website. The Company will try to resolve it without undue delay and according to the Company’s Complaints Procedure for Clients. 28.2. If a situation arises which is not expressly covered by this Agreement, the Parties agree to try to resolve the matter on the basis of good faith and fairness and by taking such action as is consistent with market practice. 28.3. The Client’s right to take legal action remains unaffected by the existence or use of any complaints procedures referred to above.

  • Third Party Proceedings The Company shall indemnify Indemnitee if Indemnitee is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the Company) by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, or any subsidiary of the Company, by reason of any action or inaction on the part of Indemnitee while an officer or director or by reason of the fact that Indemnitee is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement (if such settlement is approved in advance by the Company, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner which Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, or, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, that Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe that Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!